1597 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19014162)
21. A prospective study of treatment of severely resorbed maxillae with narrow nonsubmerged implants: results after 1 year of loading.
Hallman M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(5):731-6. PubMed ID: 11669256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Long-term implant survival in the grafted maxilla: results of a 12-year retrospective study.
Yerit KC; Posch M; Hainich S; Turhani D; Klug C; Wanschitz F; Wagner A; Watzinger F; Ewers R
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Dec; 15(6):693-9. PubMed ID: 15533130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Maxillary antral-nasal inlay autogenous bone graft reconstruction of compromised maxilla: a 12-year retrospective study.
Keller EE; Tolman DE; Eckert SE
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(5):707-21. PubMed ID: 10531743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A comparison of 3 different endosseous nonsubmerged implants in edentulous mandibles: a clinical report.
Røynesdal AK; Ambjørnsen E; Haanaes HR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(4):543-8. PubMed ID: 10453670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Endosseous implants and bone augmentation in the partially dentate maxilla: an analysis of 17 patients with a follow-up of 29 to 101 months.
Becktor JP; Isaksson S; Sennerby L
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):603-8. PubMed ID: 17929521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. CaPO4 blasted implants inserted into iliac crest homologue frozen grafts.
Franco M; Rigo L; Viscione A; De Santis B; Tropina E; Brunelli G; Guidi R; Avantaggiato A; Carinci F
J Oral Implantol; 2009; 35(4):176-80. PubMed ID: 19813421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Survival analysis of endosseous implants in grafted and nongrafted edentulous maxillae.
Becktor JP; Isaksson S; Sennerby L
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(1):107-15. PubMed ID: 14982363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Five-year success rate of 831 consecutively placed Zirconia dental implants in humans: a comparison of three different rough surfaces.
Oliva J; Oliva X; Oliva JD
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):336-44. PubMed ID: 20369093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Guided bone regeneration with autogenous block grafts applied to Le Fort I osteotomy for treatment of severely resorbed maxillae: a 4- to 6-year prospective study.
De Santis D; Trevisiol L; D'Agostino A; Cucchi A; De Gemmis A; Nocini PF
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jan; 23(1):60-9. PubMed ID: 21504483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Reconstruction of the atrophic maxilla with interpositional bone grafting/Le Fort I osteotomy and endosteal implants: a 11-16 year follow-up.
Nyström E; Nilson H; Gunne J; Lundgren S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 38(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 19046853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Le Fort I osteotomy with interpositional graft and immediate loading of delayed modified SLActive surface dental implants for rehabilitation of extremely atrophied maxilla: a case report.
Marchetti C; Felice P; Lizio G; Rossi F
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 67(7):1486-94. PubMed ID: 19531422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Porous titanium granules used as osteoconductive material for sinus floor augmentation: a clinical pilot study.
Bystedt H; Rasmusson L
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Jun; 11(2):101-5. PubMed ID: 18657154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Outcome of oral implants after autogenous bone reconstruction].
Kamal D; Abida S; Jammet P; Goudot P; Yachouh J
Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 2009 Apr; 110(2):86-8. PubMed ID: 19327803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Immediate loading of dental implants placed in revascularized fibula free flaps: a clinical report on 2 consecutive patients.
Chiapasco M; Gatti C
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):906-12. PubMed ID: 15623070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Implant rehabilitation of the atrophic edentulous maxilla including immediate fixed provisional restoration without the use of bone grafting: a review of 1-year outcome data from a long-term prospective clinical trial.
Toljanic JA; Baer RA; Ekstrand K; Thor A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):518-26. PubMed ID: 19587876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Clinical outcome of root-shaped dental implants of various diameters: 5-year results.
Krennmair G; Seemann R; Schmidinger S; Ewers R; Piehslinger E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):357-66. PubMed ID: 20369096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Sinus augmentation bone grafts for the provision of dental implants: report of clinical outcome.
McCarthy C; Patel RR; Wragg PF; Brook IM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):377-82. PubMed ID: 12814312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Performance of dental implants after staged sinus floor elevation procedures: 5-year results of a prospective study in partially edentulous patients.
Bornstein MM; Chappuis V; von Arx T; Buser D
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Oct; 19(10):1034-43. PubMed ID: 18828820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Reconstruction of severely atrophic jaws using homografts and simultaneous implant placement: a retrospective study.
Viscioni A; Rigo L; Franco M; Brunelli G; Avantaggiato A; Sollazzo V; Carinci F
J Oral Implantol; 2010; 36(2):131-9. PubMed ID: 20426590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Efficacy of implant placement after bone grafting for three-dimensional reconstruction of the posterior jaw.
Bahat O; Fontanessi RV
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2001 Jun; 21(3):220-31. PubMed ID: 11490399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
