These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19014686)

  • 1. Development of a quality assessment tool for systematic reviews of observational studies (QATSO) of HIV prevalence in men having sex with men and associated risk behaviours.
    Wong WC; Cheung CS; Hart GJ
    Emerg Themes Epidemiol; 2008 Nov; 5():23. PubMed ID: 19014686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of tools for assessing the methodological quality of primary and secondary studies in health technology assessment reports in Germany.
    Dreier M; Borutta B; Stahmeyer J; Krauth C; Walter U
    GMS Health Technol Assess; 2010 Jun; 6():Doc07. PubMed ID: 21289880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment.
    Philips Z; Ginnelly L; Sculpher M; Claxton K; Golder S; Riemsma R; Woolacoot N; Glanville J
    Health Technol Assess; 2004 Sep; 8(36):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-158. PubMed ID: 15361314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?
    Allen D; Rixson L
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Mar; 6(1):78-110. PubMed ID: 21631815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Some notes on critical appraisal of prevalence studies: Comment on: "The development of a critical appraisal tool for use in systematic reviews addressing questions of prevalence".
    Harder T
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2014 Oct; 3(5):289-90. PubMed ID: 25337603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.
    Walters SJ; Stern C; Robertson-Malt S
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2016 Apr; 14(4):138-97. PubMed ID: 27532315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography.
    Sanderson S; Tatt ID; Higgins JP
    Int J Epidemiol; 2007 Jun; 36(3):666-76. PubMed ID: 17470488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development and validation of methods for assessing the quality of diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Whiting P; Rutjes AW; Dinnes J; Reitsma J; Bossuyt PM; Kleijnen J
    Health Technol Assess; 2004 Jun; 8(25):iii, 1-234. PubMed ID: 15193208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Innovative tools for quality assessment: integrated quality criteria for review of multiple study designs (ICROMS).
    Zingg W; Castro-Sanchez E; Secci FV; Edwards R; Drumright LN; Sevdalis N; Holmes AH
    Public Health; 2016 Apr; 133():19-37. PubMed ID: 26704633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review.
    Zeng X; Zhang Y; Kwong JS; Zhang C; Li S; Sun F; Niu Y; Du L
    J Evid Based Med; 2015 Feb; 8(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 25594108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Critical appraisal in rapid systematic reviews of COVID-19 studies: implementation of the Quality Criteria Checklist (QCC).
    Duval D; Pearce-Smith N; Palmer JC; Sarfo-Annin JK; Rudd P; Clark R
    Syst Rev; 2023 Mar; 12(1):55. PubMed ID: 36973811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development, content validation, and reliability of the Assessment of Real-World Observational Studies (ArRoWS) critical appraisal tool.
    Coles B; Tyrer F; Hussein H; Dhalwani N; Khunti K
    Ann Epidemiol; 2021 Mar; 55():57-63.e15. PubMed ID: 33011384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?
    Allen D; Rixson L
    JBI Libr Syst Rev; 2008; 6(15):583-632. PubMed ID: 27819972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Preferred reporting items for overviews of systematic reviews including harms checklist: a pilot tool to be used for balanced reporting of benefits and harms.
    Bougioukas KI; Liakos A; Tsapas A; Ntzani E; Haidich AB
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Jan; 93():9-24. PubMed ID: 29037888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Systematic reviews synthesized evidence without consistent quality assessment of primary studies examining epidemiology of chronic diseases.
    Shamliyan T; Kane RL; Jansen S
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Jun; 65(6):610-8. PubMed ID: 22424987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions.
    Downs SH; Black N
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1998 Jun; 52(6):377-84. PubMed ID: 9764259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The measurement properties of assessment tools for chronic wounds: A systematic review.
    Smet S; Probst S; Holloway S; Fourie A; Beele H; Beeckman D
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2021 Sep; 121():103998. PubMed ID: 34237439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.