BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

395 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19015013)

  • 1. Human performance on a two-alternative rapid-acquisition choice task.
    Lie C; Harper DN; Hunt M
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):244-9. PubMed ID: 19015013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gestational exposure to methylmercury retards choice in transition in aging rats.
    Newland MC; Reile PA; Langston JL
    Neurotoxicol Teratol; 2004; 26(2):179-94. PubMed ID: 15019952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Human choice behaviour in a frequently changing environment.
    Krägeloh CU; Zapanta AE; Shepherd D; Landon J
    Behav Processes; 2010 Jan; 83(1):119-26. PubMed ID: 19941940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of reinforcer choice measured in single-operant and concurrent-schedule procedures.
    Geckeler AS; Libby ME; Graff RB; Ahearn WH
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(3):347-51. PubMed ID: 11051580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The matching law and effects of reinforcer rate and magnitude on choice in transition.
    Kyonka EG
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jun; 78(2):210-6. PubMed ID: 18243576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of ethanol reinforcement in 1-day-old rats: assessment through a brief and novel operant procedure.
    Bordner KA; Molina JC; Spear NE
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2008 Apr; 32(4):580-92. PubMed ID: 18366451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Choice in a variable environment: effects of d-amphetamine on sensitivity to reinforcement.
    Rodewald AM; Hughes CE; Pitts RC
    Behav Processes; 2010 May; 84(1):460-4. PubMed ID: 20188157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Four-alternative choice violates the constant-ratio rule.
    Elliffe D; Davison M
    Behav Processes; 2010 May; 84(1):381-9. PubMed ID: 19941942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of unpredictable changes in initial-link duration on choice and timing.
    Kyonka EG; Grace RC
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):227-32. PubMed ID: 19429216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rapid acquisition of preference in concurrent schedules: effects of reinforcement amount.
    Maguire DR; Hughes CE; Pitts RC
    Behav Processes; 2007 Jun; 75(2):213-9. PubMed ID: 17416469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improving conditional discrimination learning and memory in five-year-old children: differential outcomes effect using different types of reinforcement.
    Martínez L; Estévez AF; Fuentes LJ; Overmier JB
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Aug; 62(8):1617-30. PubMed ID: 19214832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Every reinforcer counts: reinforcer magnitude and local preference.
    Davison M; Baum WM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Jul; 80(1):95-129. PubMed ID: 13677611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modeling the dynamics of choice.
    Baum WM; Davison M
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 19429211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of orbital prefrontal cortex lesions on performance on a progressive ratio schedule: implications for models of inter-temporal choice.
    Kheramin S; Body S; Herrera FM; Bradshaw CM; Szabadi E; Deakin JF; Anderson IM
    Behav Brain Res; 2005 Jan; 156(1):145-52. PubMed ID: 15474659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rapid acquisition of preference in concurrent schedules: effects of d-amphetamine on sensitivity to reinforcement amount.
    Maguire DR; Rodewald AM; Hughes CE; Pitts RC
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):238-43. PubMed ID: 19429218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of reinforcer magnitude and alternative reinforcer delay on preference for alcohol during a multiple-choice procedure.
    Benson TA; Little CS; Henslee AM; Correia CJ
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2009 Feb; 100(1-2):161-3. PubMed ID: 19013028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of delayed reinforcers on the behavior of an animal model of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).
    Johansen EB; Sagvolden T; Kvande G
    Behav Brain Res; 2005 Jul; 162(1):47-61. PubMed ID: 15922066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Behavioral effects of intra-cranial self-stimulation in an animal model of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).
    Johansen EB; Sagvolden T
    Behav Brain Res; 2005 Jul; 162(1):32-46. PubMed ID: 15922065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of lesions of the orbitofrontal cortex on sensitivity to delayed and probabilistic reinforcement.
    Mobini S; Body S; Ho MY; Bradshaw CM; Szabadi E; Deakin JF; Anderson IM
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2002 Mar; 160(3):290-8. PubMed ID: 11889498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of contingent auditory stimuli on concurrent schedule performance: an alternative punisher to electric shock.
    Reed P; Yoshino T
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jul; 78(3):421-8. PubMed ID: 18406078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.