128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19015071)
1. Impact of a mammography screening programme on the breast cancer population of the Region of Valencia (Spain).
Pérez-Fidalgo JA; Miranda J; Chirivella I; Ibáñez J; Bermejo B; Pons C; Melchor I; Santaballa A; Martínez-Ruiz F; Lluch A; Salas D
Clin Transl Oncol; 2008 Nov; 10(11):745-52. PubMed ID: 19015071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Breast cancer incidence, 1980-2006: combined roles of menopausal hormone therapy, screening mammography, and estrogen receptor status.
Glass AG; Lacey JV; Carreon JD; Hoover RN
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Aug; 99(15):1152-61. PubMed ID: 17652280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Readmissions and complications in breast ductal carcinoma in situ: A retrospective study comparing screen- and non-screen-detected patients.
Politi J; Sala M; Domingo L; Vernet-Tomas M; Román M; Macià F; Castells X
Womens Health (Lond); 2020; 16():1745506520965899. PubMed ID: 33076785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Could Patients Older than 75 Years Benefit from a Systematic Breast Cancer Screening Program?
Ilenko A; Sergent F; Mercuzot A; Zitoun M; Chauffert B; Foulon A; Gondry J; Chevreau J
Anticancer Res; 2017 Feb; 37(2):903-907. PubMed ID: 28179350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bilateral breast cancer: early detection with mammography.
Roubidoux MA; Helvie MA; Lai NE; Paramagul C
Radiology; 1995 Aug; 196(2):427-31. PubMed ID: 7617856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improved breast cancer survival following introduction of an organized mammography screening program among both screened and unscreened women: a population-based cohort study.
Kalager M; Haldorsen T; Bretthauer M; Hoff G; Thoresen SO; Adami HO
Breast Cancer Res; 2009; 11(4):R44. PubMed ID: 19575807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Screening is associated with lower mastectomy rates in eastern Switzerland beyond stage effects.
Herrmann C; Morant R; Walser E; Mousavi M; Thürlimann B
BMC Cancer; 2021 Mar; 21(1):229. PubMed ID: 33676446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Breast cancer in Mexican women under 40].
Robles-Castillo J; Ruvalcaba-Limón E; Maffuz A; Rodríguez-Cuevas S
Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2011 Aug; 79(8):482-8. PubMed ID: 21966845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Early results of breast cancer screening research].
Nowicki A; Stogowska I
Ginekol Pol; 2007 Jun; 78(6):464-70. PubMed ID: 17899703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. First epidemiological analysis of breast cancer incidence and tumor characteristics after implementation of population-based digital mammography screening.
Weigel S; Batzler WU; Decker T; Hense HW; Heindel W
Rofo; 2009 Dec; 181(12):1144-50. PubMed ID: 19859859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does breast screening offer a survival benefit? A retrospective comparative study of oncological outcomes of screen-detected and symptomatic early stage breast cancer cases.
Újhelyi M; Pukancsik D; Kelemen P; Kovács E; Kenessey I; Udvarhelyi N; Bak M; Kovács T; Mátrai Z
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Dec; 42(12):1814-1820. PubMed ID: 27424787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Local recurrence based on size after conservative surgery in breast cancer stage T1-T2. A population-based study].
Martínez-Ramos D; Fortea-Sanchis C; Escrig-Sos J; Prats-de Puig M; Queralt-Martín R; Salvador-Sanchis JL
Cir Cir; 2014; 82(3):252-61. PubMed ID: 25238466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Changes in incidence of in situ and invasive breast cancer by histology type following mammography screening.
Luke C; Priest K; Roder D
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2006; 7(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 16629519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Overdiagnosis in organised mammography screening in Denmark. A comparative study.
Jørgensen KJ; Zahl PH; Gøtzsche PC
BMC Womens Health; 2009 Dec; 9():36. PubMed ID: 20028513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Breast cancer screening with tomosynthesis (3D mammography) with acquired or synthetic 2D mammography compared with 2D mammography alone (STORM-2): a population-based prospective study.
Bernardi D; Macaskill P; Pellegrini M; Valentini M; Fantò C; Ostillio L; Tuttobene P; Luparia A; Houssami N
Lancet Oncol; 2016 Aug; 17(8):1105-1113. PubMed ID: 27345635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Incidence of and treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.
Ernster VL; Barclay J; Kerlikowske K; Grady D; Henderson C
JAMA; 1996 Mar; 275(12):913-8. PubMed ID: 8598618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Digital mammography screening in Germany: Impact of age and histological subtype on program sensitivity.
Heidinger O; Heidrich J; Batzler WU; Krieg V; Weigel S; Heindel W; Hense HW
Breast; 2015 Jun; 24(3):191-6. PubMed ID: 25687106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Overdiagnosis in screening mammography in Denmark: population based cohort study.
Njor SH; Olsen AH; Blichert-Toft M; Schwartz W; Vejborg I; Lynge E
BMJ; 2013 Feb; 346():f1064. PubMed ID: 23444414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Breast cancer in young women from a low risk population in Nepal.
Thapa B; Singh Y; Sayami P; Shrestha UK; Sapkota R; Sayami G
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2013; 14(9):5095-9. PubMed ID: 24175782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mammography screening matters for young women with breast carcinoma: evidence of downstaging among 42-49-year-old women with a history of previous mammography screening.
Buseman S; Mouchawar J; Calonge N; Byers T
Cancer; 2003 Jan; 97(2):352-8. PubMed ID: 12518359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
