137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19015497)
1. Assessing a retrieval account of the generation and perceptual-interference effects.
Mulligan NW; Peterson D
Mem Cognit; 2008 Dec; 36(8):1371-82. PubMed ID: 19015497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Enactment and retrieval.
Peterson DJ; Mulligan NW
Mem Cognit; 2010 Mar; 38(2):233-43. PubMed ID: 20173195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Disentangling encoding versus retrieval explanations of the bizarreness effect: implications for distinctiveness.
McDaniel MA; Dornburg CC; Guynn MJ
Mem Cognit; 2005 Mar; 33(2):270-9. PubMed ID: 16028582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The bizarreness effect: evidence for the critical influence of retrieval processes.
Geraci L; McDaniel MA; Miller TM; Hughes ML
Mem Cognit; 2013 Nov; 41(8):1228-37. PubMed ID: 23737359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Order information and retrieval distinctiveness: recall of common versus bizarre material.
McDaniel MA; DeLosh EL; Merritt PS
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Jul; 26(4):1045-56. PubMed ID: 10946377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Testing the item-order account of design effects using the production effect.
Jonker TR; Levene M; Macleod CM
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Mar; 40(2):441-8. PubMed ID: 24219087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Retrieval during learning facilitates subsequent memory encoding.
Pastötter B; Schicker S; Niedernhuber J; Bäuml KH
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Mar; 37(2):287-97. PubMed ID: 21171804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The emergence of item-specific encoding effects in between-subjects designs: perceptual interference and multiple recall tests.
Mulligan NW
Psychon Bull Rev; 2002 Jun; 9(2):375-82. PubMed ID: 12120803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dissociative effects of orthographic distinctiveness in pure and mixed lists: an item-order account.
McDaniel MA; Cahill M; Bugg JM; Meadow NG
Mem Cognit; 2011 Oct; 39(7):1162-73. PubMed ID: 21584853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of word frequency on individual-item and serial order retention: tests of the order-encoding view.
Merritt PS; DeLosh EL; McDaniel MA
Mem Cognit; 2006 Dec; 34(8):1615-27. PubMed ID: 17489288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The generation effect and experimental design.
Mulligan NW; Smith SA; Buchin ZL
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Aug; 45(8):1422-1431. PubMed ID: 30284868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Differential effects of intrinsic properties of natural scenes and interference mechanisms on recognition processes in long-term visual memory.
Mikhailova A; Lightfoot S; Santos-Victor J; Coco MI
Cogn Process; 2024 Feb; 25(1):173-187. PubMed ID: 37831320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Memory and attention: A double dissociation between memory encoding and memory retrieval.
Mulligan NW; Spataro P; West JT
Cognition; 2023 Sep; 238():105509. PubMed ID: 37354786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Negative recency effects in delayed recognition: Spacing, consolidation, and retrieval strategy processes.
Sheaffer R; Levy DA
Mem Cognit; 2022 Nov; 50(8):1683-1693. PubMed ID: 35277835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Testing a Strategy-Disruption Account of the List-Strength Effect.
Ensor TM; Bancroft TD; Guitard D; Bireta TJ; Hockley WE; Surprenant AM
Exp Psychol; 2020 Jul; 67(4):255-275. PubMed ID: 33111659
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory.
Craik FI; Govoni R; Naveh-Benjamin M; Anderson ND
J Exp Psychol Gen; 1996 Jun; 125(2):159-80. PubMed ID: 8683192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reduced interference from memory testing: A postretrieval monitoring account.
Pierce BH; Gallo DA; McCain JL
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Jul; 43(7):1063-1072. PubMed ID: 28114777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Retrieval practice can eliminate list method directed forgetting.
Abel M; Bäuml KH
Mem Cognit; 2016 Jan; 44(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 26286882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reminders can enhance or impair episodic memory updating: a memory-for-change perspective.
Wahlheim CN; Smith WG; Delaney PF
Memory; 2019 Jul; 27(6):849-867. PubMed ID: 30810473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The drawing effect: Evidence for costs and benefits using pure and mixed lists.
Huff MJ; Namias JM; Poe P
Mem Cognit; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38519781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
