These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
290 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1901610)
1. Setting health care priorities in Oregon. Cost-effectiveness meets the rule of rescue. Hadorn DC JAMA; 1991 May; 265(17):2218-25. PubMed ID: 1901610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Oregon's Medicaid ranking and cost-effectiveness: is there any relationship? Tengs TO; Meyer G; Siegel JE; Pliskin JS; Graham JD; Weinstein MC Med Decis Making; 1996; 16(2):99-107. PubMed ID: 8778541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prioritising health services in an era of limits: the Oregon experience. Kitzhaber JA BMJ; 1993 Aug; 307(6900):373-7. PubMed ID: 8374424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Setting health care priorities: Oregon's next steps. Dougherty CJ Hastings Cent Rep; 1991; 21(3):S1-10. PubMed ID: 11642897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Oregon experiment: the role of cost-benefit analysis in the allocation of Medicaid funds. Blumstein JF Soc Sci Med; 1997 Aug; 45(4):545-54. PubMed ID: 9226780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Should basic care get priority? Doubts about rationing the Oregon way. Veatch RM Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1991 Sep; 1(3):187-206. PubMed ID: 10114318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Oregon's plan. Should it be approved? Eddy DM JAMA; 1991 Nov; 266(17):2439-45. PubMed ID: 1920751 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Setting health care priorities in Oregon. JAMA; 1991 Aug; 266(8):1080-1. PubMed ID: 1907672 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Justice and the moral acceptability of rationing medical care: the Oregon experiment. Nelson RM; Drought T J Med Philos; 1992 Feb; 17(1):97-117. PubMed ID: 1545187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Oregon's experiment. Brannigan M Health Care Anal; 1993 Jun; 1(1):15-32. PubMed ID: 10134352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prioritization of health care services. A progress report by the Oregon Health Services Commission. Klevit HD; Bates AC; Castanares T; Kirk EP; Sipes-Metzler PR; Wopat R Arch Intern Med; 1991 May; 151(5):912-6. PubMed ID: 1902658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Oregon's denial. Disabilities and quality of life. Menzel PT Hastings Cent Rep; 1992; 22(6):21-5. PubMed ID: 1428843 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The Oregon priority-setting exercise: cost-effectiveness and the rule of rescue, revisited. Hadorn D Med Decis Making; 1996; 16(2):117-9. PubMed ID: 8778529 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The Oregon priority-setting exercise: quality of life and public policy. Hadorn DC Hastings Cent Rep; 1991; 21(3):S11-6. PubMed ID: 11642898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An evaluation of Oregon's Medicaid rationing algorithms. Tengs TO Health Econ; 1996; 5(3):171-81. PubMed ID: 8817293 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Rationing care in Oregon: the new accountability. Fox DM; Leichter HM Health Aff (Millwood); 1991; 10(2):7-27. PubMed ID: 1885148 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Ethics and priority setting in Oregon. Callahan D Health Aff (Millwood); 1991; 10(2):78-87. PubMed ID: 1885149 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]