563 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19016356)
1. Effect of availability of fetal ECG monitoring on operative deliveries.
Kale A; Chong YS; Biswas A
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(11):1189-93. PubMed ID: 19016356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. STAN, a clinical audit: the outcome of 2 years of regular use in the city of Varberg, Sweden.
Welin AK; Norén H; Odeback A; Andersson M; Andersson G; Rosén KG
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2007; 86(7):827-32. PubMed ID: 17611828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A randomised clinical trial on cardiotocography plus fetal blood sampling versus cardiotocography plus ST-analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram (STAN) for intrapartum monitoring.
Westerhuis ME; Moons KG; van Beek E; Bijvoet SM; Drogtrop AP; van Geijn HP; van Lith JM; Mol BW; Nijhuis JG; Oei SG; Porath MM; Rijnders RJ; Schuitemaker NW; van der Tweel I; Visser GH; Willekes C; Kwee A
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2007 Jul; 7():13. PubMed ID: 17655764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Prevention of perinatal asphyxia. Can more be done by fetal monitoring?].
Herbst A
Lakartidningen; 2000 Aug; 97(32-33):3484-8. PubMed ID: 11037592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Clinical analysis of continuous electronic fetal heart rate monitoring for preterm small for gestational age during labor].
Guo XH; Su FM; Zhang HY
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Feb; 40(2):106-8. PubMed ID: 15840290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intrapartum monitoring with cardiotocography and ST-waveform analysis in breech presentation: an observational study.
Kessler J; Moster D; Albrechtsen S
BJOG; 2015 Mar; 122(4):528-35. PubMed ID: 25040705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The importance of the learning process in ST analysis interpretation and its impact in improving clinical and neonatal outcomes.
Timonen S; Holmberg K
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jun; 218(6):620.e1-620.e7. PubMed ID: 29577914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effectiveness of pulse oximetry versus fetal electrocardiography for the intrapartum evaluation of nonreassuring fetal heart rate.
Valverde M; Puertas AM; Lopez-Gallego MF; Carrillo MP; Aguilar MT; Montoya F
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Dec; 159(2):333-7. PubMed ID: 21978943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Central fetal monitoring: effect on perinatal outcomes and cesarean section rate.
Withiam-Leitch M; Shelton J; Fleming E
Birth; 2006 Dec; 33(4):284-8. PubMed ID: 17150066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of intrapartum automated fetal electrocardiography and conventional cardiotocography--a randomised controlled study.
Ojala K; Vääräsmäki M; Mäkikallio K; Valkama M; Tekay A
BJOG; 2006 Apr; 113(4):419-23. PubMed ID: 16553653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Clinical use of central electronic monitoring system].
Guo X; Xu H; Xie K
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2000 Jan; 35(1):17-9. PubMed ID: 11831942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fetal ST segment heart rate analysis in labor: improvement of intervention criteria using interpolated base deficit.
Mansano RZ; Beall MH; Ross MG
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2007 Jan; 20(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 17437199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Delay in intervention increases neonatal morbidity in births monitored with cardiotocography and ST-waveform analysis.
Kessler J; Moster D; Albrechtsen S
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Feb; 93(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 24251909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Combined monitoring of labor: maternal and neonatal results].
Goeschen K
Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol; 1992; 196(3):103-5. PubMed ID: 1496843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Cardiotocography practice 6].
Bellée H
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1984; 106(10):700-1. PubMed ID: 6485617
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Fetal electrocardiotocography in labor and neonatal outcome: an observational study in 1889 patients in the French center of Edouard Herriot, Lyon.
Massoud M; Giannesi A; Amabile N; Manevy M; Geron G; Gaucherand P
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2007 Nov; 20(11):819-24. PubMed ID: 17943643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring in low-risk pregnancies.
Westgren M; Ingemarsson E; Ingemarsson I; Solum T
Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Sep; 56(3):301-4. PubMed ID: 7422168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fetal stress and nonstress tests: an analysis and comparison of their ability to identify fetal outcome.
Pratt D; Diamond F; Yen H; Bieniarz J; Burd L
Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Oct; 54(4):419-23. PubMed ID: 492619
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Fetal pulse oximetry and wavelet analysis of the fetal heart rate in the evaluation of abnormal cardiotocography tracings.
Salamalekis E; Siristatidis C; Vasios G; Saloum J; Giannaris D; Chrelias C; Prentza A; Koutsouris D
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2006 Apr; 32(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 16594915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of fetal blood sampling on vaginal delivery and neonatal outcome in deliveries complicated by pathologic fetal heart rate: a population based cohort study.
Stein W; Hellmeyer L; Misselwitz B; Schmidt S
J Perinat Med; 2006; 34(6):479-83. PubMed ID: 17140298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
