BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

2976 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19016358)

  • 1. Fear of failure: are we doing too many trials of instrumental delivery in theatre?
    Ebulue V; Vadalkar J; Cely S; Dopwell F; Yoong W
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(11):1234-8. PubMed ID: 19016358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cohort study of operative delivery in the second stage of labour and standard of obstetric care.
    Murphy DJ; Liebling RE; Patel R; Verity L; Swingler R
    BJOG; 2003 Jun; 110(6):610-5. PubMed ID: 12798481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The impact of a trial of instrumental delivery in theatre on neonatal outcome.
    Olagundoye V; MacKenzie IZ
    BJOG; 2007 May; 114(5):603-8. PubMed ID: 17439569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Indications and maternofetal outcome of instrumental deliveries at the University Teaching Hospital of Yaounde, Cameroon.
    Nkwabong E; Nana PN; Mbu R; Takang W; Ekono MR; Kouam L
    Trop Doct; 2011 Jan; 41(1):5-7. PubMed ID: 20940289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Forceps or vacuum extraction: a comparison of maternal and neonatal morbidity.
    Shihadeh A; Al-Najdawi W
    East Mediterr Health J; 2001; 7(1-2):106-14. PubMed ID: 12596959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of obstetric forceps in Finland today--experience at Vaasa Central Hospital 1984-1998.
    Gardberg M; Ahinko-Hakamaa K; Laakkonen E; Kivelä P
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1999 Oct; 78(9):803-5. PubMed ID: 10535345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Instrumental delivery: clinical practice guidelines from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians.
    Vayssière C; Beucher G; Dupuis O; Feraud O; Simon-Toulza C; Sentilhes L; Meunier E; Parant O; Schmitz T; Riethmuller D; Baud O; Galley-Raulin F; Diemunsch P; Pierre F; Schaal JP; Fournié A; Oury JF;
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Nov; 159(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 21802193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Instrumental (operative) vaginal deliveries: vacuum extraction compared with forceps delivery at Ilorin University Teaching Hospital, Nigeria.
    Anate M
    West Afr J Med; 1991; 10(2):127-36. PubMed ID: 1911480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Breech delivery and foetal outcome: a review of 291 cases.
    Mekbib TA
    Ethiop Med J; 1995 Jul; 33(3):175-82. PubMed ID: 7588656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A randomised prospective trial of the obstetric forceps versus vacuum extraction using defined criteria.
    Weerasekera DS; Premaratne S
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2002 Jul; 22(4):344-5. PubMed ID: 12521450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Can formal education and training improve the outcome of instrumental delivery?
    Cheong YC; Abdullahi H; Lashen H; Fairlie FM
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2004 Apr; 113(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 15063949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Unexpected reduction in the incidence of birth trauma and birth asphyxia related to instrumental deliveries during the study period: was this the Hawthorne effect?
    Leung WC; Lam HS; Lam KW; To M; Lee CP
    BJOG; 2003 Mar; 110(3):319-22. PubMed ID: 12628276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Maternal morbidity after Thierry's spatulas and vacuum deliveries].
    Menard JP; Provansal M; Heckenroth H; Gamerre M; Bretelle F; Mazouni C
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2008 Jun; 36(6):623-7. PubMed ID: 18539070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Central fetal monitoring: effect on perinatal outcomes and cesarean section rate.
    Withiam-Leitch M; Shelton J; Fleming E
    Birth; 2006 Dec; 33(4):284-8. PubMed ID: 17150066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cohort study of maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to use of episiotomy at instrumental vaginal delivery.
    Youssef R; Ramalingam U; Macleod M; Murphy DJ
    BJOG; 2005 Jul; 112(7):941-5. PubMed ID: 15957996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Short-term maternal and neonatal outcomes by mode of delivery. A case-controlled study.
    Benedetto C; Marozio L; Prandi G; Roccia A; Blefari S; Fabris C
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2007 Nov; 135(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 17126475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise.
    Hankins GD; Clark SM; Munn MB
    Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):276-87. PubMed ID: 17011400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes between vacuum extraction and forceps deliveries.
    Mesleh RA; Al-Sawadi HM; Kurdi AM
    Saudi Med J; 2002 Jul; 23(7):811-3. PubMed ID: 12174231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Failed individual and sequential instrumental vaginal delivery: contributing risk factors and maternal-neonatal complications.
    Al-Kadri H; Sabr Y; Al-Saif S; Abulaimoun B; Ba'Aqeel H; Saleh A
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2003 Jul; 82(7):642-8. PubMed ID: 12790846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Failed vacuum extraction. Maternal risk factors and pregnancy outcome.
    Sheiner E; Shoham-Vardi I; Silberstein T; Hallak M; Katz M; Mazor M
    J Reprod Med; 2001 Sep; 46(9):819-24. PubMed ID: 11584484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 149.