These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

406 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19017432)

  • 1. Standardized or simple effect size: what should be reported?
    Baguley T
    Br J Psychol; 2009 Aug; 100(Pt 3):603-17. PubMed ID: 19017432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How skewed are psychological data? A standardized index of effect size.
    Malgady RG
    J Gen Psychol; 2007 Jul; 134(3):355-9. PubMed ID: 17824403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy in parameter estimation for targeted effects in structural equation modeling: sample size planning for narrow confidence intervals.
    Lai K; Kelley K
    Psychol Methods; 2011 Jun; 16(2):127-48. PubMed ID: 21417531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists.
    Nakagawa S; Cuthill IC
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2007 Nov; 82(4):591-605. PubMed ID: 17944619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Challenging the validity of conclusions based on P-values alone: a critique of contemporary clinical research design and methods.
    Ebramzadeh E; McKellop H; Dorey F; Sarmiento A
    Instr Course Lect; 1994; 43():587-600. PubMed ID: 9097190
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Extracting a maximum of useful information from statistical research data.
    Sohlberg S; Andersson G
    Scand J Psychol; 2005 Feb; 46(1):69-77. PubMed ID: 15660635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On effect size.
    Kelley K; Preacher KJ
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Jun; 17(2):137-52. PubMed ID: 22545595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fixed- versus random-effects models in meta-analysis: model properties and an empirical comparison of differences in results.
    Schmidt FL; Oh IS; Hayes TL
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Feb; 62(Pt 1):97-128. PubMed ID: 18001516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Meta-analytic interval estimation for standardized and unstandardized mean differences.
    Bonett DG
    Psychol Methods; 2009 Sep; 14(3):225-38. PubMed ID: 19719359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimating standardized linear contrasts of means with desired precision.
    Bonett DG
    Psychol Methods; 2009 Mar; 14(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 19271844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Confidence intervals for standardized linear contrasts of means.
    Bonett DG
    Psychol Methods; 2008 Jun; 13(2):99-109. PubMed ID: 18557680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using effect sizes for research reporting: examples using item response theory to analyze differential item functioning.
    Steinberg L; Thissen D
    Psychol Methods; 2006 Dec; 11(4):402-15. PubMed ID: 17154754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reporting practices in confirmatory factor analysis: an overview and some recommendations.
    Jackson DL; Gillaspy JA; Purc-Stephenson R
    Psychol Methods; 2009 Mar; 14(1):6-23. PubMed ID: 19271845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An alternative to Cohen's standardized mean difference effect size: a robust parameter and confidence interval in the two independent groups case.
    Algina J; Keselman HJ; Penfield RD
    Psychol Methods; 2005 Sep; 10(3):317-28. PubMed ID: 16221031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimation of reliability for multiple-component measuring instruments in test-retest designs.
    Raykov T; Penev S
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2005 Nov; 58(Pt 2):285-99. PubMed ID: 16293201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Basic philosophy of statistical tests, confidence intervals and sample size determination.
    Indrayan A; Satyanarayana L
    Indian Pediatr; 2000 Jul; 37(7):739-51. PubMed ID: 10906806
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect size estimates: current use, calculations, and interpretation.
    Fritz CO; Morris PE; Richler JJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2012 Feb; 141(1):2-18. PubMed ID: 21823805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Statistical power and analytical quantification.
    Araujo P; Frøyland L
    J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci; 2007 Mar; 847(2):305-8. PubMed ID: 17070737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Putting research in context: understanding confidence intervals from one or more studies.
    Finch S; Cumming G
    J Pediatr Psychol; 2009 Oct; 34(9):903-16. PubMed ID: 19095715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the use of beta coefficients in meta-analysis.
    Peterson RA; Brown SP
    J Appl Psychol; 2005 Jan; 90(1):175-81. PubMed ID: 15641898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.