410 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19018930)
1. Interpretation of tests of heterogeneity and bias in meta-analysis.
Ioannidis JP
J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):951-7. PubMed ID: 19018930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Between-trial heterogeneity in meta-analyses may be partially explained by reported design characteristics.
Rhodes KM; Turner RM; Savović J; Jones HE; Mawdsley D; Higgins JPT
J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Mar; 95():45-54. PubMed ID: 29217451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Common scientific and statistical errors in obesity research.
George BJ; Beasley TM; Brown AW; Dawson J; Dimova R; Divers J; Goldsby TU; Heo M; Kaiser KA; Keith SW; Kim MY; Li P; Mehta T; Oakes JM; Skinner A; Stuart E; Allison DB
Obesity (Silver Spring); 2016 Apr; 24(4):781-90. PubMed ID: 27028280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Harnessing the power of excess statistical significance: Weighted and iterative least squares.
Stanley TD; Doucouliagos H
Psychol Methods; 2024 Apr; 29(2):407-420. PubMed ID: 35549315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Why most published research findings are false.
Ioannidis JP
PLoS Med; 2005 Aug; 2(8):e124. PubMed ID: 16060722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Statistical tests, P values, confidence intervals, and power: a guide to misinterpretations.
Greenland S; Senn SJ; Rothman KJ; Carlin JB; Poole C; Goodman SN; Altman DG
Eur J Epidemiol; 2016 Apr; 31(4):337-50. PubMed ID: 27209009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Interpreting Meta-Analyses: A Guide to Funnel and Forest Plots.
Brush PL; Sherman M; Lambrechts MJ
Clin Spine Surg; 2024 Feb; 37(1):40-42. PubMed ID: 37684723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Are most published research findings false? Trends in statistical power, publication selection bias, and the false discovery rate in psychology (1975-2017).
Schneck A
PLoS One; 2023; 18(10):e0292717. PubMed ID: 37847689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Approaches for synthesising complex mental health interventions in meta-analysis.
Caldwell DM; Welton NJ
Evid Based Ment Health; 2016 Feb; 19(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 26792834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. How to Use and Report on
Boscardin CK; Sewell JL; Tolsgaard MG; Pusic MV
Perspect Med Educ; 2024; 13(1):250-254. PubMed ID: 38680196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessing robustness to worst case publication bias using a simple subset meta-analysis.
Mathur MB
BMJ; 2024 Mar; 384():e076851. PubMed ID: 38490665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Publication bias and the chase for statistical significance.
Marín-Franch I
J Optom; 2018; 11(2):67-68. PubMed ID: 29622154
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Commentary: towards a definite coherent heterogeneity in meta-analyses.
Genkinger JM; Terry MB
Int J Epidemiol; 2014 Aug; 43(4):1236-9. PubMed ID: 24997208
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Practical approaches to improving translatability and reproducibility in preclinical pain research.
Soliman N; Denk F
Brain Behav Immun; 2024 Jan; 115():38-42. PubMed ID: 37793487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Observational studies: practical tips for avoiding common statistical pitfalls.
Sterrantino AF
Lancet Reg Health Southeast Asia; 2024 Jun; 25():100415. PubMed ID: 38863985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Heterogeneity of Treatment Effect - An Evolution in Subgroup Analysis.
Yarnell CJ; Fralick M
NEJM Evid; 2024 Apr; 3(4):EVIDe2400054. PubMed ID: 38805605
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test.
Egger M; Davey Smith G; Schneider M; Minder C
BMJ; 1997 Sep; 315(7109):629-34. PubMed ID: 9310563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials.
Sterne JA; Sutton AJ; Ioannidis JP; Terrin N; Jones DR; Lau J; Carpenter J; Rücker G; Harbord RM; Schmid CH; Tetzlaff J; Deeks JJ; Peters J; Macaskill P; Schwarzer G; Duval S; Altman DG; Moher D; Higgins JP
BMJ; 2011 Jul; 343():d4002. PubMed ID: 21784880
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions.
Page MJ; McKenzie JE; Kirkham J; Dwan K; Kramer S; Green S; Forbes A
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Oct; 2014(10):MR000035. PubMed ID: 25271098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses.
Ioannidis JP
Milbank Q; 2016 Sep; 94(3):485-514. PubMed ID: 27620683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
