These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19019097)

  • 1. Judging the quality of clinical audit by general practitioners: a pilot study comparing the assessments of medical peers and NHS audit specialists.
    Bowie P; McKay J; Murray L; Lough M
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Dec; 14(6):1038-43. PubMed ID: 19019097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Variations in the ability of general medical practitioners to apply two methods of clinical audit: A five-year study of assessment by peer review.
    McKay J; Bowie P; Lough M
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2006 Dec; 12(6):622-9. PubMed ID: 17100861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The peer review pilot project: a potential system to support GP appraisal in NHS Scotland?
    Murie J; McCrae J; Bowie P
    Educ Prim Care; 2009 Jan; 20(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 19618650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The assessment of criterion audit cycles by external peer review - when is an audit not an audit?
    Bowie P; Cooke S; Lo P; McKay J; Lough M
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2007 Jun; 13(3):352-7. PubMed ID: 17518798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using a 'peer assessment questionnaire' in primary medical care.
    Elwyn G; Lewis M; Evans R; Hutchings H
    Br J Gen Pract; 2005 Sep; 55(518):690-5. PubMed ID: 16176736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Medical audit and quality of care--a new English initiative.
    Macpherson D; Mann T
    Qual Assur Health Care; 1992 Jun; 4(2):89-95. PubMed ID: 1511151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Results of the peer assessment program of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario.
    McAuley RG; Henderson HW
    Can Med Assoc J; 1984 Sep; 131(6):557-61. PubMed ID: 6478338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Peer assessment of outpatient consultation letters--feasibility and satisfaction.
    Keely E; Myers K; Dojeiji S; Campbell C
    BMC Med Educ; 2007 May; 7():13. PubMed ID: 17519024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of case note review methods for evaluating quality and safety in health care.
    Hutchinson A; Coster JE; Cooper KL; McIntosh A; Walters SJ; Bath PA; Pearson M; Young TA; Rantell K; Campbell MJ; Ratcliffe J
    Health Technol Assess; 2010 Feb; 14(10):iii-iv, ix-x, 1-144. PubMed ID: 20188021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Training the assessors for the General Medical Council's Performance Procedures.
    McAvoy PA; McCrorie P; Jolly B; Ayers AB; Cox J; Howes AD; Macdonald EB; Slimmon DJ; Southgate L
    Med Educ; 2001 Dec; 35 Suppl 1():29-35. PubMed ID: 11895252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effectiveness of an enhanced peer assessment program: introducing education into regulatory assessment.
    Wenghofer EF; Way D; Moxam RS; Wu H; Faulkner D; Klass DJ
    J Contin Educ Health Prof; 2006; 26(3):199-208. PubMed ID: 16986145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. mini-PAT (Peer Assessment Tool): a valid component of a national assessment programme in the UK?
    Archer J; Norcini J; Southgate L; Heard S; Davies H
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2008 May; 13(2):181-92. PubMed ID: 17036157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Acceptability and educational impact of a peer feedback model for significant event analysis.
    McKay J; Shepherd A; Bowie P; Lough M
    Med Educ; 2008 Dec; 42(12):1210-7. PubMed ID: 19120952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pilot study to develop and test a generic peer feedback instrument to review videotaped consultations in primary care.
    McMillan R; Cameron N; Power A
    Qual Prim Care; 2011; 19(6):347-54. PubMed ID: 22340897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. MAAGs (Medical Audit Advisory Groups): the Eli Lilly National Clinical Audit Centre.
    Baker R; Fraser R
    Int J Health Care Qual Assur; 1993; 6(3):4-8. PubMed ID: 10131445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the end user (dentist) experience of undertaking clinical audit in a PCT-led NHS Modernisation Agency pilot scheme.
    Cannell PJ
    Prim Dent Care; 2009 Oct; 16(4):168-76. PubMed ID: 19796520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assuring validity of multisource feedback in a national programme.
    Archer J; McGraw M; Davies H
    Arch Dis Child; 2010 May; 95(5):330-5. PubMed ID: 20457700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measuring how well the NHS looks after its own staff: methodology of the first national clinical audits of occupational health services in the NHS.
    Williams S; Rogers C; Peel P; Harvey SB; Henderson M; Madan I; Smedley J; Grant R
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2012 Apr; 18(2):283-9. PubMed ID: 21087370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A qualitative study of why general practitioners may participate in significant event analysis and educational peer assessment.
    Bowie P; McKay J; Dalgetty E; Lough M
    Qual Saf Health Care; 2005 Jun; 14(3):185-9. PubMed ID: 15933315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Revalidation of general dental practitioners in Scotland: the results of a pilot study. Part 2 - acceptability to practitioners.
    Maidment YG; Rennie JS; Thomas M
    Br Dent J; 2006 Apr; 200(8):455-8; discussion 445. PubMed ID: 16703042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.