These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19019239)

  • 1. Alternatives to project-specific consent for access to personal information for health research: insights from a public dialogue.
    Willison DJ; Swinton M; Schwartz L; Abelson J; Charles C; Northrup D; Cheng J; Thabane L
    BMC Med Ethics; 2008 Nov; 9():18. PubMed ID: 19019239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Consent for use of personal information for health research: do people with potentially stigmatizing health conditions and the general public differ in their opinions?
    Willison DJ; Steeves V; Charles C; Schwartz L; Ranford J; Agarwal G; Cheng J; Thabane L
    BMC Med Ethics; 2009 Jul; 10():10. PubMed ID: 19630941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Alternatives to project-specific consent for access to personal information for health research: what is the opinion of the Canadian public?
    Willison DJ; Schwartz L; Abelson J; Charles C; Swinton M; Northrup D; Thabane L
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2007; 14(6):706-12. PubMed ID: 17712084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The importance of purpose: moving beyond consent in the societal use of personal health information.
    Grande D; Mitra N; Shah A; Wan F; Asch DA
    Ann Intern Med; 2014 Dec; 161(12):855-62. PubMed ID: 25506854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Young people's views about consenting to data linkage: findings from the PEARL qualitative study.
    Audrey S; Brown L; Campbell R; Boyd A; Macleod J
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Mar; 16():34. PubMed ID: 27001504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Public perception of participation in low-risk clinical trials in critical care using waived consent: a Canadian national survey.
    Opgenorth D; Duquette DJ; Tyre L; Auld R; Crowder K; Gilchrist P; Young PJ; Bagshaw SM
    Can J Anaesth; 2024 Jul; 71(7):1015-1022. PubMed ID: 38459367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Patient Perspectives on Sharing Anonymized Personal Health Data Using a Digital System for Dynamic Consent and Research Feedback: A Qualitative Study.
    Spencer K; Sanders C; Whitley EA; Lund D; Kaye J; Dixon WG
    J Med Internet Res; 2016 Apr; 18(4):e66. PubMed ID: 27083521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ethical Acceptability of Postrandomization Consent in Pragmatic Clinical Trials.
    Miller DG; Kim SYH; Li X; Dickert NW; Flory J; Runge CP; Relton C
    JAMA Netw Open; 2018 Dec; 1(8):e186149. PubMed ID: 30646316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.
    Perrenoud B; Velonaki VS; Bodenmann P; Ramelet AS
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Oct; 13(10):82-94. PubMed ID: 26571285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Patient and public attitudes towards informed consent models and levels of awareness of Electronic Health Records in the UK.
    Riordan F; Papoutsi C; Reed JE; Marston C; Bell D; Majeed A
    Int J Med Inform; 2015 Apr; 84(4):237-47. PubMed ID: 25649841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Active choice but not too active: public perspectives on biobank consent models.
    Simon CM; L'heureux J; Murray JC; Winokur P; Weiner G; Newbury E; Shinkunas L; Zimmerman B
    Genet Med; 2011 Sep; 13(9):821-31. PubMed ID: 21555942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Investigating the Extent to Which Patients Should Control Access to Patient Records for Research: A Deliberative Process Using Citizens' Juries.
    Tully MP; Bozentko K; Clement S; Hunn A; Hassan L; Norris R; Oswald M; Peek N
    J Med Internet Res; 2018 Mar; 20(3):e112. PubMed ID: 29592847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Opportunities and challenges of a dynamic consent-based application: personalized options for personal health data sharing and utilization.
    Lee AR; Koo D; Kim IK; Lee E; Yoo S; Lee HY
    BMC Med Ethics; 2024 Aug; 25(1):92. PubMed ID: 39217356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Attaining adequate consent for the use of electronic patient records: an opt-out strategy to reconcile individuals' rights and public benefit.
    Clark AM; Findlay IN
    Public Health; 2005 Nov; 119(11):1003-10. PubMed ID: 16185734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pragmatic Randomized Trials Without Standard Informed Consent?: A National Survey.
    Nayak RK; Wendler D; Miller FG; Kim SY
    Ann Intern Med; 2015 Sep; 163(5):356-64. PubMed ID: 26215125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Opt-out plus, the patients' choice: preferences of cancer patients concerning information and consent regimen for future research with biological samples archived in the context of treatment.
    Vermeulen E; Schmidt MK; Aaronson NK; Kuenen M; van der Valk P; Sietses C; van den Tol P; van Leeuwen FE
    J Clin Pathol; 2009 Mar; 62(3):275-8. PubMed ID: 19017681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perspectives of Australian adults about protecting the privacy of their health information in statistical databases.
    King T; Brankovic L; Gillard P
    Int J Med Inform; 2012 Apr; 81(4):279-89. PubMed ID: 22306206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The acceptability of conducting data linkage research without obtaining consent: lay people's views and justifications.
    Xafis V
    BMC Med Ethics; 2015 Nov; 16(1):79. PubMed ID: 26577591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.