These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19019239)
21. "Let's get the best quality research we can": public awareness and acceptance of consent to use existing data in health research: a systematic review and qualitative study. Hill EM; Turner EL; Martin RM; Donovan JL BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Jun; 13():72. PubMed ID: 23734773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Clinical research without consent in adults in the emergency setting: a review of patient and public views. Lecouturier J; Rodgers H; Ford GA; Rapley T; Stobbart L; Louw SJ; Murtagh MJ BMC Med Ethics; 2008 Apr; 9():9. PubMed ID: 18445261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Public Attitudes to Digital Health Research Repositories: Cross-sectional International Survey. Nunes Vilaza G; Coyle D; Bardram JE J Med Internet Res; 2021 Oct; 23(10):e31294. PubMed ID: 34714253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A Randomised Controlled Trial of Consent Procedures for the Use of Residual Tissues for Medical Research: Preferences of and Implications for Patients, Research and Clinical Practice. Rebers S; Vermeulen E; Brandenburg AP; Stoof TJ; Zupan-Kajcovski B; Bos WJ; Jonker MJ; Bax CJ; van Driel WJ; Verwaal VJ; van den Brekel MW; Grutters JC; Tupker RA; Plusjé L; de Bree R; Schagen van Leeuwen JH; Vermeulen EG; de Leeuw RA; Brohet RM; Aaronson NK; Van Leeuwen FE; Schmidt MK PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0152509. PubMed ID: 27028128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Understanding preferences regarding consent for pragmatic trials in acute care. Dickert NW; Wendler D; Devireddy CM; Goldkind SF; Ko YA; Speight CD; Kim SY Clin Trials; 2018 Dec; 15(6):567-578. PubMed ID: 30280582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Access to medical records for research purposes: varying perceptions across research ethics boards. Willison DJ; Emerson C; Szala-Meneok KV; Gibson E; Schwartz L; Weisbaum KM; Fournier F; Brazil K; Coughlin MD J Med Ethics; 2008 Apr; 34(4):308-14. PubMed ID: 18375687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluating deliberative dialogues focussed on healthy public policy. Lavis JN; Boyko JA; Gauvin FP BMC Public Health; 2014 Dec; 14():1287. PubMed ID: 25516355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Public Attitudes toward Consent and Data Sharing in Biobank Research: A Large Multi-site Experimental Survey in the US. Sanderson SC; Brothers KB; Mercaldo ND; Clayton EW; Antommaria AHM; Aufox SA; Brilliant MH; Campos D; Carrell DS; Connolly J; Conway P; Fullerton SM; Garrison NA; Horowitz CR; Jarvik GP; Kaufman D; Kitchner TE; Li R; Ludman EJ; McCarty CA; McCormick JB; McManus VD; Myers MF; Scrol A; Williams JL; Shrubsole MJ; Schildcrout JS; Smith ME; Holm IA Am J Hum Genet; 2017 Mar; 100(3):414-427. PubMed ID: 28190457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Cluster over individual randomization: are study design choices appropriately justified? Review of a random sample of trials. Taljaard M; Goldstein CE; Giraudeau B; Nicholls SG; Carroll K; Hey SP; Brehaut JC; Jairath V; London AJ; Eldridge SM; Grimshaw JM; Fergusson DA; Weijer C Clin Trials; 2020 Jun; 17(3):253-263. PubMed ID: 32367741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Fair Shares and Sharing Fairly: A Survey of Public Views on Open Science, Informed Consent and Participatory Research in Biobanking. Joly Y; Dalpé G; So D; Birko S PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0129893. PubMed ID: 26154134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Why persons choose to opt out of an exception from informed consent cardiac arrest trial. Nelson MJ; Deiorio NM; Schmidt TA; Zive DM; Griffiths D; Newgard CD Resuscitation; 2013 Jun; 84(6):825-30. PubMed ID: 23402968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Routinisation of informed consent in online health care systems. Ploug T; Holm S Int J Med Inform; 2015 Apr; 84(4):229-36. PubMed ID: 25636823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Public Attitudes Toward the Secondary Uses of Patient Records for Pharmaceutical Companies' Activities in Japan. Nakada H; Inoue Y; Yamamoto K; Matsui K; Ikka T; Tashiro S Ther Innov Regul Sci; 2020 May; 54(3):701-708. PubMed ID: 33301155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Informed consent in biobank research: a deliberative approach to the debate. Secko DM; Preto N; Niemeyer S; Burgess MM Soc Sci Med; 2009 Feb; 68(4):781-9. PubMed ID: 19095337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Consent and widespread access to personal health information for the delivery of care: a large scale telephone survey of consumers' attitudes using vignettes in New Zealand. Whiddett D; Hunter I; McDonald B; Norris T; Waldon J BMJ Open; 2016 Aug; 6(8):e011640. PubMed ID: 27554103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Public good, personal privacy: a citizens' deliberation about using medical information for pharmacoepidemiological research. Parkin L; Paul C J Epidemiol Community Health; 2011 Feb; 65(2):150-6. PubMed ID: 19948532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Public attitudes towards the use of primary care patient record data in medical research without consent: a qualitative study. Robling MR; Hood K; Houston H; Pill R; Fay J; Evans HM J Med Ethics; 2004 Feb; 30(1):104-9. PubMed ID: 14872086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Patient Perspectives About Decisions to Share Medical Data and Biospecimens for Research. Kim J; Kim H; Bell E; Bath T; Paul P; Pham A; Jiang X; Zheng K; Ohno-Machado L JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Aug; 2(8):e199550. PubMed ID: 31433479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 2 of 4). Black A; Guilbert E; ; Costescu D; Dunn S; Fisher W; Kives S; Mirosh M; Norman WV; Pymar H; Reid R; Roy G; Varto H; Waddington A; Wagner MS; Whelan AM; ; Ferguson C; Fortin C; Kielly M; Mansouri S; Todd N J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2015 Nov; 37(11):1033-9. PubMed ID: 26629725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]