These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19019351)

  • 1. The smart potential behind probability matching.
    Gaissmaier W; Schooler LJ
    Cognition; 2008 Dec; 109(3):416-22. PubMed ID: 19019351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Probability matching in choice under uncertainty: intuition versus deliberation.
    Koehler DJ; James G
    Cognition; 2009 Oct; 113(1):123-7. PubMed ID: 19664762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Compression in visual working memory: using statistical regularities to form more efficient memory representations.
    Brady TF; Konkle T; Alvarez GA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Nov; 138(4):487-502. PubMed ID: 19883132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of visual and verbal presentation on cognitive load in vigilance, memory, and arithmetic tasks.
    Klingner J; Tversky B; Hanrahan P
    Psychophysiology; 2011 Mar; 48(3):323-32. PubMed ID: 20718934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cognitive integrity predicts transitive inference performance bias and success.
    Moses SN; Villate C; Binns MA; Davidson PS; Ryan JD
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Apr; 46(5):1314-25. PubMed ID: 18241896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Picture span test: measuring visual working memory capacity involved in remembering and comprehension.
    Tanabe A; Osaka N
    Behav Res Methods; 2009 May; 41(2):309-17. PubMed ID: 19363171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What drives memory-driven attentional capture? The effects of memory type, display type, and search type.
    Olivers CN
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1275-91. PubMed ID: 19803636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Negative BOLD in sensory cortices during verbal memory: a component in generating internal representations?
    Azulay H; Striem E; Amedi A
    Brain Topogr; 2009 May; 21(3-4):221-31. PubMed ID: 19326203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Individual differences in Sternberg's memory scanning task.
    Corbin L; Marquer J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jun; 131(2):153-62. PubMed ID: 19435628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Learning to avoid in older age.
    Frank MJ; Kong L
    Psychol Aging; 2008 Jun; 23(2):392-8. PubMed ID: 18573012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Domain knowledge moderates the influence of visual saliency in scene recognition.
    Humphrey K; Underwood G
    Br J Psychol; 2009 May; 100(Pt 2):377-98. PubMed ID: 18822185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. There are at least two kinds of probability matching: evidence from a secondary task.
    Otto AR; Taylor EG; Markman AB
    Cognition; 2011 Feb; 118(2):274-9. PubMed ID: 21145046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stability, reliability and consistency of the compositions of brain oscillations.
    Fingelkurts AA; Fingelkurts AA; Ermolaev VA; Kaplan AY
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Feb; 59(2):116-26. PubMed ID: 15946755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Memory without awareness: pigeons do not show metamemory in delayed matching to sample.
    Sutton JE; Shettleworth SJ
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2008 Apr; 34(2):266-82. PubMed ID: 18426309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sex differences of event-related potential effects during three-dimensional mental rotation.
    Yu Q; Tang Y; Li J; Lu Q; Wang H; Sui D; Zhou L; Wang Y; Heil M
    Neuroreport; 2009 Jan; 20(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 19057281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The change probability effect: incidental learning, adaptability, and shared visual working memory resources.
    van Lamsweerde AE; Beck MR
    Conscious Cogn; 2011 Dec; 20(4):1676-89. PubMed ID: 21963330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual and spatial working memory are not that dissociated after all: a time-based resource-sharing account.
    Vergauwe E; Barrouillet P; Camos V
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jul; 35(4):1012-28. PubMed ID: 19586267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison processes in category learning: from theory to behavior.
    Hammer R; Bar-Hillel A; Hertz T; Weinshall D; Hochstein S
    Brain Res; 2008 Aug; 1225():102-18. PubMed ID: 18614160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A decrement-to-familiarity interpretation of the revelation effect from forced-choice tests of recognition memory.
    Hicks JL; Marsh RL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1998 Sep; 24(5):1105-20. PubMed ID: 9747525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparative neuropsychological test battery differentiates cognitive signatures of Fragile X and Down syndrome.
    Kogan CS; Boutet I; Cornish K; Graham GE; Berry-Kravis E; Drouin A; Milgram NW
    J Intellect Disabil Res; 2009 Feb; 53(2):125-42. PubMed ID: 19054268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.