340 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19019767)
1. Effectiveness of random and focused review in detecting surgical pathology error.
Raab SS; Grzybicki DM; Mahood LK; Parwani AV; Kuan SF; Rao UN
Am J Clin Pathol; 2008 Dec; 130(6):905-12. PubMed ID: 19019767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Measuring errors in surgical pathology in real-life practice: defining what does and does not matter.
Renshaw AA; Gould EW
Am J Clin Pathol; 2007 Jan; 127(1):144-52. PubMed ID: 17145620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detection and classification of diagnostic discrepancies (errors) in surgical pathology.
Roy JE; Hunt JL
Adv Anat Pathol; 2010 Sep; 17(5):359-65. PubMed ID: 20733354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Surgical pathology sign-out. Routine review of every case by a second pathologist.
Safrin RE; Bark CJ
Am J Surg Pathol; 1993 Nov; 17(11):1190-2. PubMed ID: 8214266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Initial experience with a novel pre-sign-out quality assurance tool for review of random surgical pathology diagnoses in a subspecialty-based university practice.
Owens SR; Wiehagen LT; Kelly SM; Piccoli AL; Lassige K; Yousem SA; Dhir R; Parwani AV
Am J Surg Pathol; 2010 Sep; 34(9):1319-23. PubMed ID: 20697250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Virtual slide telepathology for an academic teaching hospital surgical pathology quality assurance program.
Graham AR; Bhattacharyya AK; Scott KM; Lian F; Grasso LL; Richter LC; Carpenter JB; Chiang S; Henderson JT; Lopez AM; Barker GP; Weinstein RS
Hum Pathol; 2009 Aug; 40(8):1129-36. PubMed ID: 19540562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quality assurance of anatomic pathology diagnoses: Comparison of alternate approaches.
Layfield LJ; Frazier SR
Pathol Res Pract; 2017 Feb; 213(2):126-129. PubMed ID: 28040330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Amended reports in surgical pathology and implications for diagnostic error detection and avoidance: a College of American Pathologists Q-probes study of 1,667,547 accessioned cases in 359 laboratories.
Nakhleh RE; Zarbo RJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Apr; 122(4):303-9. PubMed ID: 9648896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detecting and preventing the occurrence of errors in the practices of laboratory medicine and anatomic pathology: 15 years' experience with the College of American Pathologists' Q-PROBES and Q-TRACKS programs.
Novis DA
Clin Lab Med; 2004 Dec; 24(4):965-78. PubMed ID: 15555751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pathology and patient safety: the critical role of pathology informatics in error reduction and quality initiatives.
Becich MJ; Gilbertson JR; Gupta D; Patel A; Grzybicki DM; Raab SS
Clin Lab Med; 2004 Dec; 24(4):913-43, vi. PubMed ID: 15555749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical impact and frequency of anatomic pathology errors in cancer diagnoses.
Raab SS; Grzybicki DM; Janosky JE; Zarbo RJ; Meier FA; Jensen C; Geyer SJ
Cancer; 2005 Nov; 104(10):2205-13. PubMed ID: 16216029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Measuring the value of review of pathology material by a second pathologist.
Renshaw AA; Gould EW
Am J Clin Pathol; 2006 May; 125(5):737-9. PubMed ID: 16707375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Directed peer review in surgical pathology.
Smith ML; Raab SS
Adv Anat Pathol; 2012 Sep; 19(5):331-7. PubMed ID: 22885382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Database construction for improving patient safety by examining pathology errors.
Grzybicki DM; Turcsanyi B; Becich MJ; Gupta D; Gilbertson JR; Raab SS
Am J Clin Pathol; 2005 Oct; 124(4):500-9. PubMed ID: 16146808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Recent trends in quality, patient safety, and error reduction in nongyn cytology.
Silverman JF
Adv Anat Pathol; 2010 Nov; 17(6):437-44. PubMed ID: 20966649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The development and testing of a laboratory information system-driven tool for pre-sign-out quality assurance of random surgical pathology reports.
Owens SR; Dhir R; Yousem SA; Kelly SM; Piccoli A; Wiehagen L; Lassige K; Parwani AV
Am J Clin Pathol; 2010 Jun; 133(6):836-41. PubMed ID: 20472840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Agreement and error rates using blinded review to evaluate surgical pathology of biopsy material.
Renshaw AA; Cartagena N; Granter SR; Gould EW
Am J Clin Pathol; 2003 Jun; 119(6):797-800. PubMed ID: 12817425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality assurance in surgical pathology--personal and peer assessment.
Murthy MS; Derman H
Am J Clin Pathol; 1981 Mar; 75(3 Suppl):462-6. PubMed ID: 7468536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Correlation of workload with disagreement and amendment rates in surgical pathology and nongynecologic cytology.
Renshaw AA; Gould EW
Am J Clin Pathol; 2006 Jun; 125(6):820-2. PubMed ID: 16690479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of latent factors contributing to error: addressing surgical pathology error wisely.
Smith ML; Raab SS
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2011 Nov; 135(11):1436-40. PubMed ID: 22032570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
