127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1902021)
1. Intra- and paraorbital lesions: value of fat-suppression MR imaging with paramagnetic contrast enhancement.
Tien RD; Chu PK; Hesselink JR; Szumowski J
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1991; 12(2):245-53. PubMed ID: 1902021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The role of fat-suppression technique and gadopentetate dimeglumine in magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of intraocular tumors and simulating lesions.
De Potter P; Flanders AE; Shields JA; Shields CL; Gonzales CF; Rao VM
Arch Ophthalmol; 1994 Mar; 112(3):340-8. PubMed ID: 8129659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. MR fat suppression combined with Gd-DTPA enhancement in optic neuritis and perineuritis.
Tien RD; Hesselink JR; Szumowski J
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1991; 15(2):223-7. PubMed ID: 2002098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Enhancement and demyelination of the intraorbital optic nerve. Fat suppression magnetic resonance imaging.
Guy J; Mao J; Bidgood WD; Mancuso A; Quisling RG
Ophthalmology; 1992 May; 99(5):713-9. PubMed ID: 1594216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Orbit, skull base, and pharynx: contrast-enhanced fat suppression MR imaging.
Barakos JA; Dillon WP; Chew WM
Radiology; 1991 Apr; 179(1):191-8. PubMed ID: 2006277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [The MRT of the orbit: the value of T1-weighted frequency-selective fat saturation at 1.0 and 1.5 tesla].
Link TM; Reimer P; Rummeny EJ; Schuierer G; Grenzebach U; Peters PE
Rofo; 1995 Nov; 163(5):406-10. PubMed ID: 8527754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MR imaging of optic nerve lesions: value of gadopentetate dimeglumine and fat-suppression technique.
Hendrix LE; Kneeland JB; Haughton VM; Daniels DL; Szumowski J; Williams AL; Mark LP; Czervionke LF
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1990; 11(4):749-54. PubMed ID: 2114763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improved detection and delineation of head and neck lesions with fat suppression spin-echo MR imaging.
Tien RD; Hesselink JR; Chu PK; Szumowski J
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1991; 12(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 1846994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fat-suppressed MR of the orbit and cavernous sinus: comparison of fast spin-echo and conventional spin-echo.
Mukherji SK; Tart RP; Fitzsimmons J; Belden C; McGorray S; Guy J; Mancuso AA
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1994 Oct; 15(9):1707-14. PubMed ID: 7847218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Gadolinium-DTPA combined with a fat suppression technique in studies with magnetic resonance at 0.5 T in soft-tissue neoplasms].
Battolla L; Zampa V; Mascalchi M; Falaschi F; Bagnolesi P; Tessa C; Paolicchi A; Bartolozzi C
Radiol Med; 1994 Oct; 88(4):353-8. PubMed ID: 7997603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fat-suppression MR imaging in neuroradiology: techniques and clinical application.
Tien RD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Feb; 158(2):369-79. PubMed ID: 1729800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. MR imaging of orbital mass lesions with contrast agent: a preliminary report.
Mihara F; Gupta KL; Murayama S; Lee N; Haik BG
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 1991; 15(6):445-9. PubMed ID: 1773418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced MR imaging of the postoperative lumbar spine: comparison of fat-suppressed and conventional T1-weighted images.
Mirowitz SA; Shady KL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Aug; 159(2):385-9. PubMed ID: 1632362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Rectal carcinoma: prospective comparison of conventional and gadopentetate dimeglumine enhanced fat-suppressed MR imaging.
Okizuka H; Sugimura K; Yoshizako T; Kaji Y; Wada A
J Magn Reson Imaging; 1996; 6(3):465-71. PubMed ID: 8724412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. MR imaging of optic nerve lesions: value of gadopentetate dimeglumine and fat-suppression technique.
Hendrix LE; Kneeland JB; Haughton VM; Daniels DL; Szumowski J; Williams AL; Mark LP; Czervionke LF
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1990 Oct; 155(4):849-54. PubMed ID: 2119121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Usefulness of fat-suppression magnetic resonance imaging for oral and maxillofacial lesions.
Kitagawa Y; Ishii Y; Kawamura Y; Hayashi K; Ogasawara T; Morihiro H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1996 Dec; 25(6):457-62. PubMed ID: 8986550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intraorbital optic nerve and experimental optic neuritis. Correlation of fat suppression magnetic resonance imaging and electron microscopy.
Guy J; Fitzsimmons J; Ellis EA; Beck B; Mancuso A
Ophthalmology; 1992 May; 99(5):720-5. PubMed ID: 1594217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic value of gadopentetate dimeglumine for 1.5-T MR imaging of musculoskeletal masses: comparison with unenhanced T1- and T2-weighted imaging.
Rosenthal RE; Wozney P
J Magn Reson Imaging; 1991; 1(5):547-51. PubMed ID: 1790379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled imaging of the liver: pulse sequence optimization and comparison with spin-echo MR imaging.
Low RN; Francis IR; Herfkens RJ; Jeffrey RB; Glazer GM; Foo TK; Shimakawa A; Pelc NJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Mar; 160(3):501-9. PubMed ID: 8381572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. MR imaging of head and neck tumors: comparison of T1-weighted contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed images with conventional T2-weighted and fast spin-echo T2-weighted images.
Ross MR; Schomer DF; Chappell P; Enzmann DR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jul; 163(1):173-8. PubMed ID: 8010208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
