78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19020215)
1. Automated classification of breast parenchymal density: topologic analysis of x-ray attenuation patterns depicted with digital mammography.
Boehm HF; Schneider T; Buhmann-Kirchhoff SM; Schlossbauer T; Rjosk-Dendorfer D; Britsch S; Reiser M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Dec; 191(6):W275-82. PubMed ID: 19020215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantitative assessment of breast density from digitized mammograms into Tabar's patterns.
Jamal N; Ng KH; Looi LM; McLean D; Zulfiqar A; Tan SP; Liew WF; Shantini A; Ranganathan S
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(22):5843-57. PubMed ID: 17068368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Determination of similarity measures for pairs of mass lesions on mammograms by use of BI-RADS lesion descriptors and image features.
Muramatsu C; Li Q; Schmidt RA; Shiraishi J; Doi K
Acad Radiol; 2009 Apr; 16(4):443-9. PubMed ID: 19268856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Automated classification of normal and pathologic pulmonary tissue by topological texture features extracted from multi-detector CT in 3D.
Boehm HF; Fink C; Attenberger U; Becker C; Behr J; Reiser M
Eur Radiol; 2008 Dec; 18(12):2745-55. PubMed ID: 18618121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Computer aided detection system for micro calcifications in digital mammograms.
Mohamed H; Mabrouk MS; Sharawy A
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2014 Oct; 116(3):226-35. PubMed ID: 24909786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Utility of adaptive control processing for the interpretation of digital mammograms.
Jinnouchi M; Yabuuchi H; Kubo M; Tokunaga E; Yamamoto H; Honda H
Acta Radiol; 2016 Nov; 57(11):1297-1303. PubMed ID: 25995309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Markov random field-based clustering applied to the segmentation of masses in digital mammograms.
Suliga M; Deklerck R; Nyssen E
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2008 Sep; 32(6):502-12. PubMed ID: 18620842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Breast lesion detection and classification: comparison of screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading--observer performance study.
Skaane P; Balleyguier C; Diekmann F; Diekmann S; Piguet JC; Young K; Niklason LT
Radiology; 2005 Oct; 237(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 16100086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Automated effect-specific mammographic pattern measures.
Raundahl J; Loog M; Pettersen P; Tanko LB; Nielsen M
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2008 Aug; 27(8):1054-60. PubMed ID: 18672423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A similarity learning approach to content-based image retrieval: application to digital mammography.
El-Naqa I; Yang Y; Galatsanos NP; Nishikawa RM; Wernick MN
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Oct; 23(10):1233-44. PubMed ID: 15493691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantifying effect-specific mammographic density.
Raundahl J; Loog M; Pettersen P; Nielsen M
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2007; 10(Pt 2):580-7. PubMed ID: 18044615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How mammographic breast density affects radiologists' visual search patterns.
Al Mousa DS; Brennan PC; Ryan EA; Lee WB; Tan J; Mello-Thoms C
Acad Radiol; 2014 Nov; 21(11):1386-93. PubMed ID: 25172414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms.
Skaane P; Kshirsagar A; Stapleton S; Young K; Castellino RA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):377-84. PubMed ID: 17242245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of using manual or automatic breast density information in a mass detection CAD system.
Oliver A; Lladó X; Freixenet J; Martí R; Pérez E; Pont J; Zwiggelaar R
Acad Radiol; 2010 Jul; 17(7):877-83. PubMed ID: 20540910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The quantitative analysis of mammographic densities.
Byng JW; Boyd NF; Fishell E; Jong RA; Yaffe MJ
Phys Med Biol; 1994 Oct; 39(10):1629-38. PubMed ID: 15551535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Region-based wavelet coding methods for digital mammography.
Penedo M; Pearlman WA; Tahoces PG; Souto M; Vidal JJ
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Oct; 22(10):1288-96. PubMed ID: 14552582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Identification of the breast edge using areas enclosed by iso-intensity contours.
Padayachee J; Alport MJ; Rae WI
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2007 Sep; 31(6):390-400. PubMed ID: 17398069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A concentric morphology model for the detection of masses in mammography.
Eltonsy NH; Tourassi GD; Elmaghraby AS
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Jun; 26(6):880-9. PubMed ID: 17679338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Radiologists' preferences for digital mammographic display. The International Digital Mammography Development Group.
Pisano ED; Cole EB; Major S; Zong S; Hemminger BM; Muller KE; Johnston RE; Walsh R; Conant E; Fajardo LL; Feig SA; Nishikawa RM; Yaffe MJ; Williams MB; Aylward SR
Radiology; 2000 Sep; 216(3):820-30. PubMed ID: 10966717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Breast density evaluation using spectral mammography, radiologist reader assessment, and segmentation techniques: a retrospective study based on left and right breast comparison.
Molloi S; Ding H; Feig S
Acad Radiol; 2015 Aug; 22(8):1052-9. PubMed ID: 26031229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
