166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19020321)
1. South Dakota's abortion script--threatening the physician-patient relationship.
Lazzarini Z
N Engl J Med; 2008 Nov; 359(21):2189-91. PubMed ID: 19020321
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Abortion rights after South Dakota.
McDonagh E
Free Inq; 2006; 26(4):34-8. PubMed ID: 16830439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Journey through the courts: minors, abortion and the quest for reproductive fairness.
Ehrlich JS
Yale J Law Fem; 1998; 10(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 16596765
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Consti-tortion: tort law as an end-run around abortion rights after Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
Stone AJ
Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2000; 8(2):471-515. PubMed ID: 16594110
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Rationalizing the abortion debate: legal rhetoric and the abortion controversy.
Chemerinsky E
Buffalo Law Rev; 1982; 31(1):107-64. PubMed ID: 11655711
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Toward a First Amendment theory of doctor-patient discourse and the right to receive unbiased medical advice.
Berg P
Boston Univ Law Rev; 1994 Mar; 74(2):201-66. PubMed ID: 11659979
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of the abortion decisions upon the father's role.
Witherspoon JP
Jurist; 1975; 35(1):32-65. PubMed ID: 11664577
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Physicians and the First Amendment.
Curfman GD; Morrissey S; Greene MF; Drazen JM
N Engl J Med; 2008 Dec; 359(23):2484-5. PubMed ID: 19020318
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Family law I: abortion.
Koscs ME
Annu Surv Am Law; 1984; 2():929-60. PubMed ID: 16086473
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Minor rights: the adolescent abortion cases.
Guggenheim M
Hofstra Law Rev; 2002; 30(3):589-646. PubMed ID: 15212070
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Abortion legislation after Webster v. Reproductive Health Services: model statutes and commentaries.
Smolin DM
Cumberland Law Rev; 1989-1990; 20(1):71-163. PubMed ID: 15999438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How the doctor got gagged. The disintegrating right of privacy in the physician-patient relationship.
Sugarman J; Powers M
JAMA; 1991 Dec; 266(23):3323-7. PubMed ID: 1960832
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Teenage abortion in Germany: with reference to the legal system in the United States.
Belling DW; Eberl C
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1996; 12(2):475-502. PubMed ID: 8666732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Informed consent and the First Amendment.
Mariner WK; Annas GJ
N Engl J Med; 2015 Apr; 372(14):1285-7. PubMed ID: 25830420
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Mazurek v. Armstrong: should states be allowed to restrict the performance of abortions to licensed physicians only?
Bazzelle RY
Thurgood Marshall Law Rev; 1998; 24(1):149-82. PubMed ID: 16200693
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Abortion 1990s: contemporary issues and the activist court.
Bertz RC
West State Univ Law Rev; 1992; 19(2):393-429. PubMed ID: 16047452
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Legal aspects of abortion practice.
Goldman EB
Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1986 Mar; 13(1):135-43. PubMed ID: 3709009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. What "choice" do they have?: protecting pregnant minors' reproductive rights using state constitutions.
Weissmann R
Annu Surv Am Law; 1999; 1999(1):129-67. PubMed ID: 11958234
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The new pro-life legislation: patterns and recommendations.
Witherspoon JP
St Marys Law J; 1976; 7(4):637-97. PubMed ID: 11664635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. What happens if Roe is overruled? Extraterritorial regulation of abortion by the states.
Bradford CS
Ariz Law Rev; 1993; 35(1):87-171. PubMed ID: 12645556
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
