These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19020492)

  • 1. Glandular radiation dose in tomosynthesis of the breast using tungsten targets.
    Sechopoulosa I; D'Orsi CJ
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2008 Oct; 9(4):161-171. PubMed ID: 19020492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computation of the glandular radiation dose in digital tomosynthesis of the breast.
    Sechopoulos I; Suryanarayanan S; Vedantham S; D'Orsi C; Karellas A
    Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):221-32. PubMed ID: 17278508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mean glandular dose coefficients (D(g)N) for x-ray spectra used in contemporary breast imaging systems.
    Nosratieh A; Hernandez A; Shen SZ; Yaffe MJ; Seibert JA; Boone JM
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Sep; 60(18):7179-90. PubMed ID: 26348995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Monte Carlo simulation for the estimation of the glandular breast dose for a digital breast tomosynthesis system.
    Rodrigues L; Magalhaes LA; Braz D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Dec; 167(4):576-83. PubMed ID: 25480841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Characterization of the homogeneous tissue mixture approximation in breast imaging dosimetry.
    Sechopoulos I; Bliznakova K; Qin X; Fei B; Feng SS
    Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):5050-9. PubMed ID: 22894430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mean glandular dose estimation using MCNPX for a digital breast tomosynthesis system with tungsten/aluminum and tungsten/aluminum+silver x-ray anode-filter combinations.
    Ma AK; Darambara DG; Stewart A; Gunn S; Bullard E
    Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5278-89. PubMed ID: 19175087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Normalized glandular dose (DgN) coefficients for flat-panel CT breast imaging.
    Thacker SC; Glick SJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Dec; 49(24):5433-44. PubMed ID: 15724534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Uncertainty estimation and statistical comparative methodology for mammography x-ray energy spectra.
    Santoro-Fernandes V; Santos JC; Mariano L; Vanin VR; Costa PR
    Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2020 Apr; 6(3):035018. PubMed ID: 33438663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Scatter radiation in digital tomosynthesis of the breast.
    Sechopoulos I; Suryanarayanan S; Vedantham S; D'Orsi CJ; Karellas A
    Med Phys; 2007 Feb; 34(2):564-76. PubMed ID: 17388174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Generation and analysis of clinically relevant breast imaging x-ray spectra.
    Hernandez AM; Seibert JA; Nosratieh A; Boone JM
    Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2148-2160. PubMed ID: 28303582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Normalized glandular dose coefficients for digital breast tomosynthesis systems with a homogeneous breast model.
    Sarno A; Tucciariello RM; Mettivier G; Del Sarto D; Fantacci ME; Russo P
    Phys Med Biol; 2021 Mar; 66(6):065024. PubMed ID: 33535193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Molybdenum, rhodium, and tungsten anode spectral models using interpolating polynomials with application to mammography.
    Boone JM; Fewell TR; Jennings RJ
    Med Phys; 1997 Dec; 24(12):1863-74. PubMed ID: 9434969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. COMPARISON OF SPECTRA AND MEAN GLANDULAR DOSE WITH TUBE VOLTAGES USED IN DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS FROM SIMULATED, METROLOGICAL AND CLINICAL CASES.
    da Silveira Gatto LB; Braz D; Pacifico L; Travassos P; Magalhaes LAG
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2020 Dec; 192(3):402-412. PubMed ID: 33320943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Glandular breast dose for monoenergetic and high-energy X-ray beams: Monte Carlo assessment.
    Boone JM
    Radiology; 1999 Oct; 213(1):23-37. PubMed ID: 10540637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Normalized glandular dose (DgN) coefficients for arbitrary X-ray spectra in mammography: computer-fit values of Monte Carlo derived data.
    Boone JM
    Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):869-75. PubMed ID: 12033583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of anode/filter material and tube potential on contrast, signal-to-noise ratio and average absorbed dose in mammography: a Monte Carlo study.
    Dance DR; Thilander AK; Sandborg M; Skinner CL; Castellano IA; Carlsson GA
    Br J Radiol; 2000 Oct; 73(874):1056-67. PubMed ID: 11271898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Experimental investigations for dose reduction by optimizing the radiation quality for digital mammography with an a-Se detector].
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Hermann KP; Wenkel E; Böhner C; Lell M; Dassel MS; Bautz WA
    Rofo; 2007 May; 179(5):487-91. PubMed ID: 17436182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimation of mean glandular dose for contrast enhanced digital mammography: factors for use with the UK, European and IAEA breast dosimetry protocols.
    Dance DR; Young KC
    Phys Med Biol; 2014 May; 59(9):2127-37. PubMed ID: 24699200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Normalized glandular dose (DgN) coefficients from experimental mammographic x-ray spectra.
    Santos JC; Tomal A; de Barros N; Costa PR
    Phys Med Biol; 2019 May; 64(10):105010. PubMed ID: 30959490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Towards standardization of x-ray beam filters in digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis: Monte Carlo simulations and analytical modelling.
    Shrestha S; Vedantham S; Karellas A
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Mar; 62(5):1969-1993. PubMed ID: 28075335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.