These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19020977)

  • 1. Best electrode locations for a small bipolar ECG device: signal strength analysis of clinical data.
    Puurtinen M; Viik J; Hyttinen J
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2009 Feb; 37(2):331-6. PubMed ID: 19020977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimating the measuring sensitivity of unipolar and bipolar ECG with lead field method and FDM models.
    Puurtinen M; Viik J; Takano N; Malmivuo J; Hyttinen J
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2009 May; 94(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 19185947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimized Electrode Locations for Wearable Single-Lead ECG Monitoring Devices: A Case Study Using WFEES Modules based on the LANS Method.
    Zhu H; Pan Y; Wu F; Huan R
    Sensors (Basel); 2019 Oct; 19(20):. PubMed ID: 31615163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How many electrodes and where? A "poldermodel" for electrocardiography.
    Kors JA; van Herpen G
    J Electrocardiol; 2002; 35 Suppl():7-12. PubMed ID: 12539094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sensitivity of CIPS-computed PVC location to measurement errors in ECG electrode position: the need for the 3D camera.
    van Dam PM; Gordon JP; Laks M
    J Electrocardiol; 2014; 47(6):788-93. PubMed ID: 25194874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Corrected body surface potential mapping.
    Krenzke G; Kindt C; Hetzer R
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2007 Feb; 52(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 17313332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of electrode placement errors in the EASI-derived 12-lead electrocardiogram.
    Finlay DD; Nugent CD; Nelwan SP; Bond RR; Donnelly MP; Guldenring D
    J Electrocardiol; 2010; 43(6):606-11. PubMed ID: 20832814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Doubts of the cardiologist regarding an electrocardiogram presenting QRS V1-V2 complexes with positive terminal wave and ST segment elevation. Consensus Conference promoted by the Italian Cardiology Society].
    Oreto G; Corrado D; Delise P; Fedele F; Gaita F; Gentile F; Giustetto C; Michelucci A; Padeletti L; Priori S
    G Ital Cardiol (Rome); 2010 Nov; 11(11 Suppl 2):3S-22S. PubMed ID: 21361048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Precordial electrode placement for optimal ECG monitoring: implications for ambulatory monitor devices and event recorders.
    Nedios S; Romero I; Gerds-Li JH; Fleck E; Kriatselis C
    J Electrocardiol; 2014; 47(5):669-76. PubMed ID: 24857184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sensitivity- and effort-gain analysis: multilead ECG electrode array selection for activation time imaging.
    Hintermüller C; Seger M; Pfeifer B; Fischer G; Modre R; Tilg B
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Oct; 53(10):2055-66. PubMed ID: 17019870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of limb electrode placement on the 12- and 16-lead electrocardiogram.
    Farrell RM; Syed A; Syed A; Gutterman DD
    J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(6):536-45. PubMed ID: 18790505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimation of ECG signal of closely separated bipolar electrodes using thorax models.
    Puurtinen M; Hyttinen J; Viik J; Kauppinen P; Malmivuo J
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2004; 2004():801-4. PubMed ID: 17271798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On designing and testing transformations for derivation of standard 12-lead/18-lead electrocardiograms and vectorcardiograms from reduced sets of predictor leads.
    Horácek BM; Warren JW; Wang JJ
    J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(3):220-9. PubMed ID: 18433613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sensitivity of Electrocardiogram on Electrode-Pair Locations for Wearable Devices: Computational Analysis of Amplitude and Waveform Distortion.
    Sanjo K; Hebiguchi K; Tang C; Rashed EA; Kodera S; Togo H; Hirata A
    Biosensors (Basel); 2024 Mar; 14(3):. PubMed ID: 38534260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A simple measure to control for variations in chest electrodes placement in serial electrocardiogram recordings.
    Soliman EZ
    J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(5):378-9. PubMed ID: 18620704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical utility of computed electrocardiographic leads.
    Batchvarov VN; Behr ER
    J Electrocardiol; 2014; 47(3):281-7. PubMed ID: 24792984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Measurement of body surface Laplacian ECG and its signal processing].
    Cao Y; Jin S; Chen M; Li G
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Aug; 24(4):768-71. PubMed ID: 17899741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Composition of approximated body-surface-potential-maps by utilizing a common 12-lead-ECG device.
    Koch H; Richter A; Kürsten R; Zabel M
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Mar; 52(3):463-70. PubMed ID: 15759576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How many leads are necessary for a reliable reconstruction of surface potentials during atrial fibrillation?
    Guillem Mde L; Bollmann A; Climent AM; Husser D; Millet-Roig J; Castells F
    IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2009 May; 13(3):330-40. PubMed ID: 19423429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of ECG electrode placement by emergency department clinicians.
    McCann K; Holdgate A; Mahammad R; Waddington A
    Emerg Med Australas; 2007 Oct; 19(5):442-8. PubMed ID: 17919217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.