These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19021602)

  • 1. Evaluating the evidence: the methodological and reporting quality of comparative observational studies of surgical interventions in urological publications.
    Tseng TY; Breau RH; Fesperman SF; Vieweg J; Dahm P
    BJU Int; 2009 Apr; 103(8):1026-31. PubMed ID: 19021602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reporting of harm in randomized controlled trials published in the urological literature.
    Breau RH; Gaboury I; Scales CD; Fesperman SF; Watterson JD; Dahm P
    J Urol; 2010 May; 183(5):1693-7. PubMed ID: 20299044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A critical assessment of the quality of reporting of randomized, controlled trials in the urology literature.
    Scales CD; Norris RD; Keitz SA; Peterson BL; Preminger GM; Vieweg J; Dahm P
    J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):1090-4; discussion 1094-5. PubMed ID: 17296417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improvement in the quality of randomized controlled trials among general anesthesiology journals 2000 to 2006: a 6-year follow-up.
    Greenfield ML; Mhyre JM; Mashour GA; Blum JM; Yen EC; Rosenberg AL
    Anesth Analg; 2009 Jun; 108(6):1916-21. PubMed ID: 19448222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does a "Level I Evidence" rating imply high quality of reporting in orthopaedic randomised controlled trials?
    Poolman RW; Struijs PA; Krips R; Sierevelt IN; Lutz KH; Bhandari M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Sep; 6():44. PubMed ID: 16965628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of the methodological quality of systematic reviews published in the urological literature from 1998 to 2008.
    MacDonald SL; Canfield SE; Fesperman SF; Dahm P
    J Urol; 2010 Aug; 184(2):648-53. PubMed ID: 20639030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating the evidence: statistical methods in randomized controlled trials in the urological literature.
    Scales CD; Norris RD; Preminger GM; Vieweg J; Peterson BL; Dahm P
    J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1463-7. PubMed ID: 18710745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How evidence-based are publications in clinical ophthalmic journals?
    Lai TY; Leung GM; Wong VW; Lam RF; Cheng AC; Lam DS
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 May; 47(5):1831-8. PubMed ID: 16638988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Can one be a urologist without being familiar with the methodology of therapeutic trials?].
    Bergmann JF
    Prog Urol; 1996 Apr; 6(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 8777412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quality of reporting randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the nursing literature: application of the consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT).
    Smith BA; Lee HJ; Lee JH; Choi M; Jones DE; Bausell RB; Broome ME
    Nurs Outlook; 2008; 56(1):31-37. PubMed ID: 18237622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Standards for surgical complication reporting in urologic oncology: time for a change.
    Donat SM
    Urology; 2007 Feb; 69(2):221-5. PubMed ID: 17320654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quality of reporting of test accuracy studies in reproductive medicine: impact of the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) initiative.
    Coppus SF; van der Veen F; Bossuyt PM; Mol BW
    Fertil Steril; 2006 Nov; 86(5):1321-9. PubMed ID: 16978620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analysis of the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials in acute and chronic myeloid leukemia, and myelodysplastic syndromes as governed by the CONSORT statement.
    Ziogas DC; Zintzaras E
    Ann Epidemiol; 2009 Jul; 19(7):494-500. PubMed ID: 19523596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 4: observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Singh V; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(1):73-108. PubMed ID: 19165298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality of interventional radiology literature: a review of articles published in JVIR and CVIR.
    Meyer J; Nsouli-Maktabi H; Spies JB
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2009 Oct; 20(10):1271-6. PubMed ID: 19631559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality of clinical reports on behavioral interventions for hypertension.
    Boulware LE; Daumit GL; Frick KD; Minkovitz CS; Lawrence RS; Powe NR
    Prev Med; 2002 Apr; 34(4):463-75. PubMed ID: 11914053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The reporting of observational research studies in dermatology journals: a literature-based study.
    Langan S; Schmitt J; Coenraads PJ; Svensson A; von Elm E; Williams H;
    Arch Dermatol; 2010 May; 146(5):534-41. PubMed ID: 20479302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration.
    Vandenbroucke JP; von Elm E; Altman DG; Gøtzsche PC; Mulrow CD; Pocock SJ; Poole C; Schlesselman JJ; Egger M;
    Epidemiology; 2007 Nov; 18(6):805-35. PubMed ID: 18049195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.