These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19022130)

  • 1. Measurement and interpretation of a maxillary occlusal cant in the frontal plane.
    Susarla SM; Dodson TB; Kaban LB
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Dec; 66(12):2498-502. PubMed ID: 19022130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Change of lip cant after bimaxillary orthognathic surgery.
    Kim YH; Jeon J; Rhee JT; Hong J
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 May; 68(5):1106-11. PubMed ID: 20202735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Change of lip-line cant after 1-jaw orthognathic surgery in patients with mandibular asymmetry.
    Hwang HS; Min YS; Lee SC; Sun MK; Lim HS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Oct; 136(4):564-9. PubMed ID: 19815160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Characteristics and corrective outcome of face asymmetry by orthognathic surgery.
    Ko EW; Huang CS; Chen YR
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Oct; 67(10):2201-9. PubMed ID: 19761914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Vertical Facial Skeletal Asymmetry and Occlusal Cant Relationship in Patients With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate.
    Akarsu-Guven B; Atik E; Gorucu-Coskuner H; Aksu M
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2021 Aug; 58(8):943-950. PubMed ID: 33287569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Occlusal cant in the frontal plane as a reflection of facial asymmetry.
    Padwa BL; Kaiser MO; Kaban LB
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1997 Aug; 55(8):811-6; discussion 817. PubMed ID: 9251608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Midfacial growth after costochondral graft construction of the mandibular ramus in hemifacial microsomia.
    Padwa BL; Mulliken JB; Maghen A; Kaban LB
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1998 Feb; 56(2):122-7; discussion 127-8. PubMed ID: 9461132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Positional symmetry of porion and external auditory meatus in facial asymmetry.
    Choi JW; Jung SY; Kim HJ; Lee SH
    Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg; 2015 Dec; 37(1):33. PubMed ID: 26451361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-dimensional analysis of the occlusal plane related to the hamular-incisive-papilla occlusal plane in young adults.
    Fu PS; Hung CC; Hong JM; Wang JC
    J Oral Rehabil; 2007 Feb; 34(2):136-40. PubMed ID: 17244236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Face bow and articulator for planning orthognathic surgery: 2 articulator.
    Walker F; Ayoub AF; Moos KF; Barbenel J
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Oct; 46(7):573-8. PubMed ID: 18462853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Occlusal plane discrepancies generated by transverse horizontal axis deviations.
    Bowley JF; Morgano SM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jul; 86(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 11458264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Selection of a horizontal reference plane in 3D evaluation: Identifying facial asymmetry and occlusal cant in orthognathic surgery planning.
    Lonic D; Sundoro A; Lin HH; Lin PJ; Lo LJ
    Sci Rep; 2017 May; 7(1):2157. PubMed ID: 28526831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Occlusal plane orientation: a statistical and clinical analysis in different clinical situations.
    Jayachandran S; Ramachandran CR; Varghese R
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Oct; 17(7):572-5. PubMed ID: 18761577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of facial asymmetries from posteroanterior cephalograms: validity of reference lines.
    Trpkova B; Prasad NG; Lam EW; Raboud D; Glover KE; Major PW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 May; 123(5):512-20. PubMed ID: 12750669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interalar distance to estimate the combined width of the six maxillary anterior teeth in oral rehabilitation treatment.
    Gomes VL; Gonçalves LC; Costa MM; Lucas Bde L
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2009; 21(1):26-35; discussion 36. PubMed ID: 19207455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A cone beam computed tomography study based on three-dimensional cephalometric analysis of relationships between the lip-line and jaw deformity.
    Teng C; Zhu J; Wang H; Yu Q
    Arch Oral Biol; 2022 Sep; 141():105489. PubMed ID: 35772255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Skeletal response to maxillary protraction with and without maxillary expansion: a finite element study.
    Gautam P; Valiathan A; Adhikari R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):723-8. PubMed ID: 19524831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The relation between pogonion advancement and posterior maxillary impaction.
    Jamilian A; Showkatbakhsh A; Gholami D; Kamali Z
    J Craniofac Surg; 2009 May; 20(3):841-3. PubMed ID: 19349906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Change of lip and occlusal cant after simultaneous maxillary and mandibular distraction osteogenesis in hemifacial microsomia.
    Balaji SM
    J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2010 Dec; 9(4):344-9. PubMed ID: 22190822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Frankfort horizontal plane is an appropriate three-dimensinal reference in the evaluation of clinical and skeletal cant.
    Oh S; Ahn J; Nam KU; Paeng JY; Hong J
    J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Apr; 39(2):71-6. PubMed ID: 24471021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.