180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19022434)
1. When do involuntarily infertile couples choose to seek medical help?
Moreau C; Bouyer J; Ducot B; Spira A; Slama R
Fertil Steril; 2010 Feb; 93(3):737-44. PubMed ID: 19022434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cumulative incidence rate of medical consultation for fecundity problems--analysis of a prevalent cohort using competing risks.
Duron S; Slama R; Ducot B; Bohet A; Sørensen DN; Keiding N; Moreau C; Bouyer J
Hum Reprod; 2013 Oct; 28(10):2872-9. PubMed ID: 23838160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Predictors of pregnancy and discontinuation of infertility services among women who received medical help to become pregnant, National Survey of Family Growth, 2002.
Farr SL; Anderson JE; Jamieson DJ; Warner L; Macaluso M
Fertil Steril; 2009 Apr; 91(4):988-97. PubMed ID: 18343375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Time to pregnancy after a previous miscarriage in subfertile couples.
Cox T; van der Steeg JW; Steures P; Hompes PG; van der Veen F; Eijkemans MJ; van Leeuwen JH; Renckens C; Bossuyt PM; Mol BW
Fertil Steril; 2010 Jul; 94(2):485-8. PubMed ID: 19442967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Infertility and assisted reproduction in Denmark. Epidemiology and psychosocial consequences.
Schmidt L
Dan Med Bull; 2006 Nov; 53(4):390-417. PubMed ID: 17150146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Birth outcomes after spontaneous or assisted conception among infertile Australian women aged 28 to 36 years: a prospective, population-based study.
Herbert DL; Lucke JC; Dobson AJ
Fertil Steril; 2012 Mar; 97(3):630-8. PubMed ID: 22265037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reproductive life events in the population living in the vicinity of a nuclear waste reprocessing plant.
Slama R; Boutou O; Ducot B; Spira A
J Epidemiol Community Health; 2008 Jun; 62(6):513-21. PubMed ID: 18477750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Return to fertility in nulliparous and parous women after removal of the GyneFix intrauterine contraceptive system.
Delbarge W; Bátár I; Bafort M; Bonnivert J; Colmant C; Dhont M; Fonzé V; Gevers R; Janssens D; Lavalley P; Salmin E; Degueldre M; Vrijens M; Van Kets H; Wildemeersch D
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2002 Mar; 7(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 12041861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2002 results from the Canadian ART Register.
Gunby J; Daya S;
Fertil Steril; 2006 Nov; 86(5):1356-64. PubMed ID: 17070192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Timing, characteristics and determinants of infertility diagnostic work up before admission to eleven second-level assisted reproductive techniques (ART) centres in Italy.
Costa M; Chiaffarino F; De Stefano C; Parazzini F
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Mar; 167(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 23182427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Spontaneous pregnancies among couples previously treated by in vitro fertilization.
Troude P; Bailly E; Guibert J; Bouyer J; de la Rochebrochard E;
Fertil Steril; 2012 Jul; 98(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 22521697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2000.
Wright VC; Schieve LA; Reynolds MA; Jeng G
MMWR Surveill Summ; 2003 Aug; 52(9):1-16. PubMed ID: 14532867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prospective longitudinal cohort study on cumulative 5-year delivery and adoption rates among 1338 couples initiating infertility treatment.
Pinborg A; Hougaard CO; Nyboe Andersen A; Molbo D; Schmidt L
Hum Reprod; 2009 Apr; 24(4):991-9. PubMed ID: 19136480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development of clinical priority access criteria for assisted reproduction and its evaluation on 1386 infertile couples in New Zealand.
Gillett WR; Peek JC; Herbison GP
Hum Reprod; 2012 Jan; 27(1):131-41. PubMed ID: 22081248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does storage time influence postthaw survival and pregnancy outcome? An analysis of 11,768 cryopreserved human embryos.
Riggs R; Mayer J; Dowling-Lacey D; Chi TF; Jones E; Oehninger S
Fertil Steril; 2010 Jan; 93(1):109-15. PubMed ID: 19027110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of body mass index on the outcomes of first assisted reproductive technology cycles.
Moragianni VA; Jones SM; Ryley DA
Fertil Steril; 2012 Jul; 98(1):102-8. PubMed ID: 22584023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Birth outcomes of intended pregnancies among women who used assisted reproductive technology, ovulation stimulation, or no treatment.
D'Angelo DV; Whitehead N; Helms K; Barfield W; Ahluwalia IB
Fertil Steril; 2011 Aug; 96(2):314-320.e2. PubMed ID: 21718990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2006 results from the Canadian ART Register.
Gunby J; Bissonnette F; Librach C; Cowan L;
Fertil Steril; 2010 May; 93(7):2189-201. PubMed ID: 19439295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cumulative incidence of infertility in a New Zealand birth cohort to age 38 by sex and the relationship with family formation.
van Roode T; Dickson NP; Righarts AA; Gillett WR
Fertil Steril; 2015 Apr; 103(4):1053-1058.e2. PubMed ID: 25637476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The impact of a decline in fecundity and of pregnancy postponement on final number of children and demand for assisted reproduction technology.
Leridon H; Slama R
Hum Reprod; 2008 Jun; 23(6):1312-9. PubMed ID: 18387960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
