BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19022435)

  • 1. Predictive factors of Essure implant placement failure: prospective, multicenter study of 495 patients.
    Panel P; Grosdemouge I
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Jan; 93(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 19022435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pregnancy after Essure placement: report of two cases.
    Moses AW; Burgis JT; Bacon JL; Risinger J
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Mar; 89(3):724.e9-11. PubMed ID: 17543963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Essure: a new device for hysteroscopic tubal sterilization in an outpatient setting.
    Ubeda A; Labastida R; Dexeus S
    Fertil Steril; 2004 Jul; 82(1):196-9. PubMed ID: 15237011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bipolar hysteroscopic procedures and placement of Essure microinserts for tubal sterilization: a case control study.
    Panel P; Grosdemouge I; Houllier M; Renouvel F; Friederich L; Le Tohic A
    Fertil Steril; 2011 Jun; 95(7):2422-5. PubMed ID: 21497338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Techniques for removal of the Essure hysteroscopic tubal occlusion device.
    Lannon BM; Lee SY
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Aug; 88(2):497.e13-4. PubMed ID: 17397840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Hysteroscopic fallopian tube sterilization procedure: feasibility and one-year follow-up].
    Gibon E; Lopès P; Linet T; Martigny H; Orieux C; Philippe HJ
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2006 Mar; 34(3):202-8. PubMed ID: 16517204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hysteroscopic tubal sterilization (essure) in women with an intrauterine device.
    Agostini A; Crochet P; Petrakian M; Estrade JP; Cravello L; Gamerre M
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(3):277-9. PubMed ID: 18439497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ultrasound: an effective method for localization of the echogenic Essure sterilization micro-insert: correlation with radiologic evaluations.
    Kerin JF; Levy BS
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(1):50-4. PubMed ID: 15904599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Placement of a permanent birth control device at a university medical center.
    Shavell VI; Abdallah ME; Diamond MP; Berman JM
    J Reprod Med; 2009 Apr; 54(4):218-22. PubMed ID: 19438163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Incorrect position of Essure microinserts 3 months after successful bilateral placement.
    Gerritse MB; Veersema S; Timmermans A; Brölmann HA
    Fertil Steril; 2009 Mar; 91(3):930.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18945426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hysteroscopic tubal sterilization with Essure intratubal devices: a case-control prospective with inert local anesthesia or without anesthesia.
    Lopes P; Gibon E; Linet T; Philippe HJ
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Jun; 138(2):199-203. PubMed ID: 17822834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Unintended pregnancies after Essure sterilization in the Netherlands.
    Veersema S; Vleugels MP; Moolenaar LM; Janssen CA; Brölmann HA
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Jan; 93(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 19027109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tubal perforation by Essure: three different clinical presentations.
    Langenveld J; Veersema S; Bongers MY; Koks CA
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Nov; 90(5):2011.e5-10. PubMed ID: 18692813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The feasibility, success and patient satisfaction associated with outpatient hysteroscopic sterilisation.
    Sinha D; Kalathy V; Gupta JK; Clark TJ
    BJOG; 2007 Jun; 114(6):676-83. PubMed ID: 17516957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Concomitant Essure tubal sterilization and Thermachoice endometrial ablation: feasibility and safety.
    Valle RF; Valdez J; Wright TC; Kenney M
    Fertil Steril; 2006 Jul; 86(1):152-8. PubMed ID: 16762347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Essure implants for tubal sterilisation in France].
    Grosdemouge I; Engrand JB; Dhainault C; Marchand F; Martigny H; Thevenot J; Villefranque V; Lopes P; Panel P
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2009 May; 37(5):389-95. PubMed ID: 19410494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Female sterilisation: a cohort controlled comparative study of ESSURE versus laparoscopic sterilisation.
    Duffy S; Marsh F; Rogerson L; Hudson H; Cooper K; Jack S; Hunter D; Philips G
    BJOG; 2005 Nov; 112(11):1522-8. PubMed ID: 16225573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Learning curve of hysteroscopic placement of tubal sterilization microinserts in 15 gynecologists in the Netherlands.
    Janse JA; Pattij TO; Eijkemans MJ; Broekmans FJ; Veersema S; Schreuder HW
    Fertil Steril; 2013 Sep; 100(3):755-60. PubMed ID: 23768989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Permanent tubal hysteroscopic sterilization].
    Panel P; Jost S; Grosdemouge I; Friederich L; Niro J; Le Tohic A
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2012; 40(7-8):434-44. PubMed ID: 22658908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparative study of hysteroscopic sterilization performed in-office versus a hospital operating room.
    Nichols M; Carter JF; Fylstra DL; Childers M;
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2006; 13(5):447-50. PubMed ID: 16962530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.