These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19024152)

  • 1. Mechanical implications of interfacial defects between femoral hip implants and cement: a finite element analysis of interfacial gaps and interfacial porosity.
    Scheerlinck T; Broos J; Janssen D; Verdonschot N
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2008 Oct; 222(7):1037-47. PubMed ID: 19024152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantification of stem-cement interfacial gaps: in vitro CT analysis of Charnley-Kerboul and Lubinus SPII femoral hip implants.
    Scheerlinck T; Vandenbussche P; Noble PC; Dunn JS
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2008 Jan; 90(1):107-13. PubMed ID: 18160511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Influence of proximal stem geometry and stem-cement interface characteristics on bone and cement stresses in femoral hip arthroplasty: finite element analysis].
    Massin P; Astoin E; Lavaste F
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2003 Apr; 89(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 12844057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of stem insertion rate on the porosity of the cement mantle of hip joint replacements.
    Baleani M; Fognani R; Toni A
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2003; 217(3):199-205. PubMed ID: 12807160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The significance of the micropores at the stem-cement interface in total hip replacement.
    Zhang H; Blunt L; Jiang X; Brown L; Barrans S
    J Biomater Sci Polym Ed; 2011; 22(7):845-56. PubMed ID: 21144164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cement mantle fatigue failure in total hip replacement: experimental and computational testing.
    Jeffers JR; Browne M; Lennon AB; Prendergast PJ; Taylor M
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(7):1525-33. PubMed ID: 17070816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stem-cement porosity may explain early loosening of cemented femoral hip components: experimental-computational in vitro study.
    Mann KA; Damron LA; Miller MA; Race A; Clarke MT; Cleary RJ
    J Orthop Res; 2007 Mar; 25(3):340-50. PubMed ID: 17149748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cement mantle stress under retroversion torque at heel-strike.
    Afsharpoya B; Barton DC; Fisher J; Purbach B; Wroblewski M; Stewart TD
    Med Eng Phys; 2009 Dec; 31(10):1323-30. PubMed ID: 19879794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The importance of a thick cement mantle depends on stem geometry and stem-cement interfacial bonding.
    Caruana J; Janssen D; Verdonschot N; Blunn GW
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2009 Apr; 223(3):315-27. PubMed ID: 19405437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of the cementing technique on the cement mantle in hip resurfacing: an in vitro computed tomography scan-based analysis.
    Scheerlinck T; Delport H; Kiewitt T
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Feb; 92(2):375-87. PubMed ID: 20124065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Finite element analysis of the effect of cementing concepts on implant stability and cement fatigue failure.
    Janssen D; van Aken J; Scheerlinck T; Verdonschot N
    Acta Orthop; 2009 Jun; 80(3):319-24. PubMed ID: 19421913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Why would cement porosity reduction be clinically irrelevant, while experimental data show the contrary.
    Janssen D; Stolk J; Verdonschot N
    J Orthop Res; 2005 Jul; 23(4):691-7. PubMed ID: 16022978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative finite element analysis of the debonding process in different concepts of cemented hip implants.
    Pérez MA; Palacios J
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2010 Jun; 38(6):2093-106. PubMed ID: 20232148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Finite element analysis of the long-term fixation strength of cemented ceramic cups.
    Janssen D; Stolk J; Verdonschot N
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2006 May; 220(4):533-9. PubMed ID: 16808069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modelling the fibrous tissue layer in cemented hip replacements: experimental and finite element methods.
    Waide V; Cristofolini L; Stolk J; Verdonschot N; Boogaard GJ; Toni A
    J Biomech; 2004 Jan; 37(1):13-26. PubMed ID: 14672564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Mathematical simulation of stem/cement/bone mechanical interactions for Poldi-Cech, CF-30, MS-30 and PFC femoral components].
    Kovanda M; Havlícek V; Hudec J
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Apr; 76(2):110-5. PubMed ID: 19439130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cemented femoral stem performance. Effects of proximal bonding, geometry, and neck length.
    Chang PB; Mann KA; Bartel DL
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Oct; (355):57-69. PubMed ID: 9917591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mechanical aspects of degree of cement bonding and implant wedge effect.
    Yoon YS; Oxland TR; Hodgson AJ; Duncan CP; Masri BA; Choi D
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2008 Nov; 23(9):1141-7. PubMed ID: 18584929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of vacuum mixing and pre-heating the femoral component on the mechanical properties of the cement mantle.
    Baleani M; Bialoblocka-Juszczyk E; Engels GE; Viceconti M
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Mar; 92(3):454-60. PubMed ID: 20190321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of Charnley hip neck-angle inclination on the stresses at stem/cement and bone/cement interfaces.
    Zaki M; Saad F; Al-Ebiary MN
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2002; 12(4):411-21. PubMed ID: 12652035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.