These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19025786)
1. Selection of the most informative individuals from families with multiple siblings for association studies. Liu C; Yang Q; Adrienne Cupples L; Meigs JB; Dupuis J Genet Epidemiol; 2009 May; 33(4):299-307. PubMed ID: 19025786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. High-resolution joint linkage disequilibrium and linkage mapping of quantitative trait loci based on sibship data. Fan R; Jung J Hum Hered; 2003; 56(4):166-87. PubMed ID: 15031619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Efficient study designs for test of genetic association using sibship data and unrelated cases and controls. Li M; Boehnke M; Abecasis GR Am J Hum Genet; 2006 May; 78(5):778-792. PubMed ID: 16642434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Novel sib pair selection strategy increases power in quantitative association analysis. Kwan JS; Cherny SS; Kung AW; Sham PC Behav Genet; 2009 Sep; 39(5):571-9. PubMed ID: 19568925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The use of imputed sibling genotypes in sibship-based association analysis: on modeling alternatives, power and model misspecification. Minică CC; Dolan CV; Hottenga JJ; Willemsen G; Vink JM; Boomsma DI Behav Genet; 2013 May; 43(3):254-66. PubMed ID: 23519635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mapping genomic regions affecting milk traits in Sarda sheep by using the OvineSNP50 Beadchip and principal components to perform combined linkage and linkage disequilibrium analysis. Usai MG; Casu S; Sechi T; Salaris SL; Miari S; Sechi S; Carta P; Carta A Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Nov; 51(1):65. PubMed ID: 31744455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Genetic architecture of growth traits in Populus revealed by integrated quantitative trait locus (QTL) analysis and association studies. Du Q; Gong C; Wang Q; Zhou D; Yang H; Pan W; Li B; Zhang D New Phytol; 2016 Feb; 209(3):1067-82. PubMed ID: 26499329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The power to detect linkage disequilibrium with quantitative traits in selected samples. Abecasis GR; Cookson WO; Cardon LR Am J Hum Genet; 2001 Jun; 68(6):1463-74. PubMed ID: 11349228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Locating human quantitative trait loci: guidelines for the selection of sibling pairs for genotyping. Eaves L; Meyer J Behav Genet; 1994 Sep; 24(5):443-55. PubMed ID: 7993321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improved power offered by a score test for linkage disequilibrium mapping of quantitative-trait loci by selective genotyping. Wallace C; Chapman JM; Clayton DG Am J Hum Genet; 2006 Mar; 78(3):498-504. PubMed ID: 16465623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of genotyping error in linkage mapping for complex traits--an analytic study. Lebrec JJ; Putter H; Houwing-Duistermaat JJ; van Houwelingen HC BMC Genet; 2008 Aug; 9():57. PubMed ID: 18721489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of genomic selection for a sib-evaluated trait using identity-by-state and identity-by-descent relationships. Vela-Avitúa S; Meuwissen TH; Luan T; Ødegård J Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Feb; 47(1):9. PubMed ID: 25888184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Power and precision of alternate methods for linkage disequilibrium mapping of quantitative trait loci. Zhao HH; Fernando RL; Dekkers JC Genetics; 2007 Apr; 175(4):1975-86. PubMed ID: 17277369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Estimating the power of variance component linkage analysis in large pedigrees. Chen WM; Abecasis GR Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Sep; 30(6):471-84. PubMed ID: 16685720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The application of the entropy-based statistic for genomic association study of QTL. Xiang Y; Li Y; Liu Z; Sun Z J Genet Genomics; 2008 Mar; 35(3):183-8. PubMed ID: 18355762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Molecular genetic analysis of spring wheat core collection using genetic diversity, population structure, and linkage disequilibrium. Mourad AMI; Belamkar V; Baenziger PS BMC Genomics; 2020 Jun; 21(1):434. PubMed ID: 32586286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. About the power of biostatistics in sibling analysis-comparison of empirical and simulated data. von Wurmb-Schwark N; Podruks E; Schwark T; Göpel W; Fimmers R; Poetsch M Int J Legal Med; 2015 Nov; 129(6):1201-9. PubMed ID: 26292643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Recent advances in human quantitative-trait-locus mapping: comparison of methods for selected sibling pairs. T Cuenco K; Szatkiewicz JP; Feingold E Am J Hum Genet; 2003 Oct; 73(4):863-73. PubMed ID: 12970847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accounting for linkage in family-based tests of association with missing parental genotypes. Martin ER; Bass MP; Hauser ER; Kaplan NL Am J Hum Genet; 2003 Nov; 73(5):1016-26. PubMed ID: 14551902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The quantitative trait linkage disequilibrium test: a more powerful alternative to the quantitative transmission disequilibrium test for use in the absence of population stratification. Havill LM; Dyer TD; Richardson DK; Mahaney MC; Blangero J BMC Genet; 2005 Dec; 6 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S91. PubMed ID: 16451707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]