192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19026400)
21. Cerclage for women with twin pregnancies: a systematic review and metaanalysis.
Li C; Shen J; Hua K
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jun; 220(6):543-557.e1. PubMed ID: 30527942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Risk of intrapartum cervical lacerations in women with cerclage.
Seravalli V; Potti S; Berghella V
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2013 Feb; 26(3):294-8. PubMed ID: 23025658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Cerclage for prevention of preterm birth in women with a short cervix found on transvaginal ultrasound examination: a randomized trial.
Berghella V; Odibo AO; Tolosa JE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Oct; 191(4):1311-7. PubMed ID: 15507959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Outcomes following elective cerclage versus ultrasound surveillance in women with one prior preterm event.
Mullin J; O'Sullivan HR; Shennan AH; Suff N
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2023 Nov; 290():1-4. PubMed ID: 37708656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The effect of 17α-hydroxyprogesterone caproate on preterm birth in women with an ultrasound-indicated cerclage.
Rafael TJ; Mackeen AD; Berghella V
Am J Perinatol; 2011 May; 28(5):389-94. PubMed ID: 21380984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effectiveness of cerclage according to severity of cervical length shortening: a meta-analysis.
Berghella V; Keeler SM; To MS; Althuisius SM; Rust OA
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Apr; 35(4):468-73. PubMed ID: 20052661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Gestational age at cervical length measurement and incidence of preterm birth.
Berghella V; Roman A; Daskalakis C; Ness A; Baxter JK
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Aug; 110(2 Pt 1):311-7. PubMed ID: 17666605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Value of post-cerclage transvaginal ultrasound in predicting preterm birth at <28 weeks in twin pregnancy with ultrasound-indicated cerclage.
Lv M; Yang H; Zhu S; Jin N; Jiang C; Zhao B; Zhou Y; Luo Q
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2023 Dec; 36(2):2266545. PubMed ID: 37821354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Randomized trial of ultrasound-indicated cerclage in singleton women without lower genital tract inflammation.
Otsuki K; Nakai A; Matsuda Y; Shinozuka N; Kawabata I; Makino Y; Kamei Y; Iwashita M; Okai T
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2016 Feb; 42(2):148-57. PubMed ID: 26633738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Pregnancy outcomes and factors affecting the clinical effects of cervical cerclage when used for different indications: A retrospective study of 326 cases.
Chen R; Huang X; Li B
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 59(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 32039796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Analysis of maternal and neonatal outcomes using cervical cerclage or conservative treatment in singleton gestations with a sonographic short cervix.
Huang X; Chen R; Li B
Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 May; 100(18):e25767. PubMed ID: 33950964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Cervical cerclage for the prevention of preterm birth.
Owen J; Mancuso M
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2012 Mar; 39(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 22370105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Use of transvaginal ultrasonography to predict preterm birth in women with a history of preterm birth.
Crane JM; Hutchens D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Oct; 32(5):640-5. PubMed ID: 18816494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The association between sonographic cervical length components and preterm birth in women with ultrasound- or exam-indicated cerclage.
Muniz Rodriguez A; Naert M; Colatosti Catanho A; Labovitis E; Rebarber A; Fox NS
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Dec; 35(25):5703-5708. PubMed ID: 33645406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Trends in cerclage use.
Suhag A; Saccone G; Bisulli M; Seligman N; Berghella V
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 Nov; 94(11):1188-94. PubMed ID: 26249133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Association between sonographic cervical appearance and preterm delivery after a history-indicated cerclage.
Miller ES; Gerber SE
J Ultrasound Med; 2014 Dec; 33(12):2181-6. PubMed ID: 25425376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Factors associated with spontaneous preterm birth risk assessed by transvaginal ultrasound following cervical cerclage.
Sim S; Da Silva Costa F; Araujo Júnior E; Sheehan PM
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2015 Aug; 55(4):344-9. PubMed ID: 26223688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Clinical implication of intra-amniotic sludge on ultrasound in patients with cervical cerclage.
Gorski LA; Huang WH; Iriye BK; Hancock J
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Oct; 36(4):482-5. PubMed ID: 20503233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The role of cervical ultrasound screening in determining the timing of emergency cerclage.
Tezcan B; Hezelgrave N; Shennan A
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2012 Jul; 32(5):444-6. PubMed ID: 22663315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Abnormal vaginal flora and spontaneous preterm birth in high-risk singleton pregnancies with cervical cerclage.
Jin W; Hughes K; Sim S; Shemer S; Sheehan PM
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Dec; 35(25):9983-9990. PubMed ID: 35686697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
