These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19026866)

  • 1. Metabolic behavior of bacterial biological control agents in soil and plant rhizospheres.
    Pielach CA; Roberts DP; Kobayashi DY
    Adv Appl Microbiol; 2008; 65():199-215. PubMed ID: 19026866
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biological control of soil-borne pathogens by fluorescent pseudomonads.
    Haas D; Défago G
    Nat Rev Microbiol; 2005 Apr; 3(4):307-19. PubMed ID: 15759041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biological control of chickpea Fusarium wilt by antagonistic bacteria under greenhouse condition.
    Jamali F; Sharifi-Tehrani A; Okhovvat M; Zakeri Z; Saberi-Riseh R
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2004; 69(4):649-51. PubMed ID: 15756852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Beneficial bacteria of agricultural importance.
    Babalola OO
    Biotechnol Lett; 2010 Nov; 32(11):1559-70. PubMed ID: 20635120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Synergistic effect of beneficial rhizosphere microflora in biocontrol and plant growth promotion.
    Kannan V; Sureendar R
    J Basic Microbiol; 2009 Apr; 49(2):158-64. PubMed ID: 18792056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Isolation and characterization of rhizosphere bacteria with potential for biological control of weeds in vineyards.
    Flores-Vargas RD; O'Hara GW
    J Appl Microbiol; 2006 May; 100(5):946-54. PubMed ID: 16629995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Unravelling rhizosphere-microbial interactions: opportunities and limitations.
    Singh BK; Millard P; Whiteley AS; Murrell JC
    Trends Microbiol; 2004 Aug; 12(8):386-93. PubMed ID: 15276615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Soil suppressiveness to Rhizoctonia solani and microbial diversity.
    Bakker Y; Van Loon FM; Schneider JH
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2005; 70(3):29-33. PubMed ID: 16637155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of two bacterial biocontrol agents on bacterial and fungal culturable groups associated with the roots of field-grown maize.
    Pereira P; Nesci A; Etcheverry M
    Lett Appl Microbiol; 2009 Apr; 48(4):493-9. PubMed ID: 19292823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Plant host habitat and root exudates shape soil bacterial community structure.
    Haichar FZ; Marol C; Berge O; Rangel-Castro JI; Prosser JI; Balesdent J; Heulin T; Achouak W
    ISME J; 2008 Dec; 2(12):1221-30. PubMed ID: 18754043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Studying plant-microbe interactions using stable isotope technologies.
    Prosser JI; Rangel-Castro JI; Killham K
    Curr Opin Biotechnol; 2006 Feb; 17(1):98-102. PubMed ID: 16413769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Transgenic potato plants expressing antimicrobial activity: establishment of pest control and environmental safety.
    Wackernagel W; Düring K
    Forum Nutr; 2003; 56():317-8. PubMed ID: 15806917
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Metagenomics revealed a quorum quenching lactonase QlcA from yet unculturable soil bacteria.
    Riaz K; Elmerich C; Raffoux A; Moreira D; Dessaux Y; Faure D
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2008; 73(2):3-6. PubMed ID: 19226736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Mathematic modeling of the dynamics of the interacting population of the rhizosphere microorganisms].
    Kravchenko LV; Strigul' NS; Shvytov IA
    Mikrobiologiia; 2004; 73(2):233-40. PubMed ID: 15198036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Influence of supplement of agricultural useful strains of microorganisms on microbial coenobia of plant rhizosphere].
    Sherstoboieva OV
    Mikrobiol Z; 2003; 65(6):43-8. PubMed ID: 15077548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Selection of potential antagonists against asparagus crown and root rot caused by Fusarium spp.
    Rubio-Pérez E; Molinero-Ruiz ML; Melero-Vara JM; Basallote-Ureba MJ
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2008; 73(2):203-6. PubMed ID: 19226757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Non-target effects of bacterial biological control agents suppressing root pathogenic fungi.
    Winding A; Binnerup SJ; Pritchard H
    FEMS Microbiol Ecol; 2004 Feb; 47(2):129-41. PubMed ID: 19712329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Root secretions: from genes and molecules to microbial associations.
    Biedrzycki ML; Bais HP
    J Exp Bot; 2009; 60(6):1533-4. PubMed ID: 19386613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of rhizobacterial community composition in soil suppressive or conducive to tobacco black root rot disease.
    Kyselková M; Kopecký J; Frapolli M; Défago G; Ságová-Marecková M; Grundmann GL; Moënne-Loccoz Y
    ISME J; 2009 Oct; 3(10):1127-38. PubMed ID: 19554036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pseudomonas fluorescens and closely-related fluorescent pseudomonads as biocontrol agents of soil-borne phytopathogens.
    Couillerot O; Prigent-Combaret C; Caballero-Mellado J; Moënne-Loccoz Y
    Lett Appl Microbiol; 2009 May; 48(5):505-12. PubMed ID: 19291210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.