BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

321 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19027622)

  • 1. Social inequality in Pap smear coverage: identifying under-users of cervical cancer screening in Argentina.
    Arrossi S; Ramos S; Paolino M; Sankaranarayanan R
    Reprod Health Matters; 2008 Nov; 16(32):50-8. PubMed ID: 19027622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Use of the Pap test by a population group in Buenos Aires.
    Klimovsky E; Matos E
    Bull Pan Am Health Organ; 1996 Dec; 30(4):313-21. PubMed ID: 9041742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pap smear screening among urban Southwestern American Indian women.
    Risendal B; DeZapien J; Fowler B; Papenfuss M; Giuliano A
    Prev Med; 1999 Dec; 29(6 Pt 1):510-8. PubMed ID: 10600432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Women's knowledge about cervical cancer, Pap smear and human papillomavirus and its relation to screening in Argentina.
    Paolino M; Arrossi S
    Women Health; 2011 Jan; 51(1):72-87. PubMed ID: 21391162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Social support and cervical and breast cancer screening in Argentinean women from a rural population.
    Gamarra CJ; Paz EP; Griep RH
    Public Health Nurs; 2009; 26(3):269-76. PubMed ID: 19386062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of cervical cancer screening program at a rural community of South Africa.
    Hoque M; Hoque E; Kader SB
    East Afr J Public Health; 2008 Aug; 5(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 19024420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Organized cervical cancer screening for underpriviledged women].
    Piana L; Leandri FX; Jacqueme B; Heid P; Corti J; Andrac-Meyer L; Sancho-Garnier H
    Bull Cancer; 2007 May; 94(5):461-7. PubMed ID: 17535784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Participation in highly subsidized cervical cancer screening by women in Enugu, South-east Nigeria.
    Obi SN; Ozumba BC; Nwokocha AR; Waboso PA
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Apr; 27(3):305-7. PubMed ID: 17464818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cervical cancer in women with comprehensive health care access: attributable factors in the screening process.
    Leyden WA; Manos MM; Geiger AM; Weinmann S; Mouchawar J; Bischoff K; Yood MU; Gilbert J; Taplin SH
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 May; 97(9):675-83. PubMed ID: 15870438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cervical cancer screening program of Paraná: cost-effective model in a developing country.
    Bleggi Torres LF; Werner B; Totsugui J; Collaço LM; Araújo SR; Huçulak M; Boza EJ; Fischer RM; De Laat L; Sobbania LC; Raggio A
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Jul; 29(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 12827718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cervical cancer screening among U.S. women: analyses of the 2000 National Health Interview Survey.
    Hewitt M; Devesa SS; Breen N
    Prev Med; 2004 Aug; 39(2):270-8. PubMed ID: 15226035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hispanic acculturation and utilization of cervical cancer screening in the US.
    Shah M; Zhu K; Wu H; Potter J
    Prev Med; 2006 Feb; 42(2):146-9. PubMed ID: 16297444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The need to incorporate routine cervical cancer counselling and screening in the management of women at the outpatient clinics in Nigeria.
    Dim CC; Nwagha UI; Ezegwui HU; Dim NR
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2009 Nov; 29(8):754-6. PubMed ID: 19821672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effective cervical cytology screening programmes in middle-income countries: the Chilean experience.
    Sepúlveda C; Prado R
    Cancer Detect Prev; 2005; 29(5):405-11. PubMed ID: 16188399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can breast and cervical cancer screening visits be used to enhance colorectal cancer screening?
    Carlos RC; Fendrick AM; Ellis J; Bernstein SJ
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Oct; 1(10):769-76. PubMed ID: 17411698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical and cost implications of new technologies for cervical cancer screening: the impact of test sensitivity.
    Hutchinson ML; Berger BM; Farber FL
    Am J Manag Care; 2000 Jul; 6(7):766-80. PubMed ID: 11067374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of cancer screening services in Greece and associated social factors: results from the nation-wide Hellas Health I survey.
    Dimitrakaki C; Boulamatsis D; Mariolis A; Kontodimopoulos N; Niakas D; Tountas Y
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2009 Jun; 18(3):248-57. PubMed ID: 19491613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cervical cancer screening in medically underserved California Latina and non-Latina women: effect of age and regularity of Pap testing.
    Howell LP; Gurusinghe S; Tabnak F; Sciortino S
    Cancer Detect Prev; 2009; 32(5-6):372-9. PubMed ID: 19264426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Why women still die from cervical cancer.
    Masood S
    J Fla Med Assoc; 1997; 84(6):379-83. PubMed ID: 9379163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cervical cancer screening and demonstration projects to identify barriers to preventing cervical cancer mortality.
    Taylor WR; Nadel MR; Smith RA; Hernandez C; Moser M; Friedell GH
    Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(4):460-2. PubMed ID: 2546348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.