These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19028139)

  • 21. The representation of voice onset time in the cortical auditory evoked potentials of young children.
    King KA; Campbell J; Sharma A; Martin K; Dorman M; Langran J
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Dec; 119(12):2855-61. PubMed ID: 18980862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of Consonant Duration on Formation of Consonant-Vowel Syllable Evoked Auditory Cortical Potentials.
    Yaralı M; Yağcıoğlu S
    J Int Adv Otol; 2018 Apr; 14(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 29092801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Characterization of cortical auditory evoked potential (P1-N1-P2) in normal hearing young adults].
    Li YL; Liu XH; Fu XX; Qi BE
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Feb; 31(4):262-266. PubMed ID: 29871239
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cortical evoked potentials to an auditory illusion: binaural beats.
    Pratt H; Starr A; Michalewski HJ; Dimitrijevic A; Bleich N; Mittelman N
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Aug; 120(8):1514-24. PubMed ID: 19616993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Sensitivity of EEG and MEG to the N1 and P2 auditory evoked responses modulated by spectral complexity of sounds.
    Shahin AJ; Roberts LE; Miller LM; McDonald KL; Alain C
    Brain Topogr; 2007; 20(2):55-61. PubMed ID: 17899352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Plasticity in neuromagnetic cortical responses suggests enhanced auditory object representation.
    Ross B; Jamali S; Tremblay KL
    BMC Neurosci; 2013 Dec; 14():151. PubMed ID: 24314010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Modulation of P2 auditory-evoked responses by the spectral complexity of musical sounds.
    Shahin A; Roberts LE; Pantev C; Trainor LJ; Ross B
    Neuroreport; 2005 Nov; 16(16):1781-5. PubMed ID: 16237326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Self-initiation and temporal cueing of monaural tones reduce the auditory N1 and P2.
    Sowman PF; Kuusik A; Johnson BW
    Exp Brain Res; 2012 Oct; 222(1-2):149-57. PubMed ID: 22885999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. ERPs to infrequent auditory stimuli in two- and three-stimulus versions of the inter-modal oddball task.
    Brown CR; Barry RJ; Clarke AR
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Nov; 74(2):174-82. PubMed ID: 19733601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Objective measures of binaural masking level differences and comodulation masking release based on late auditory evoked potentials.
    Epp B; Yasin I; Verhey JL
    Hear Res; 2013 Dec; 306():21-8. PubMed ID: 24047593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of hearing loss and spectral shaping on identification and neural response patterns of stop-consonant stimuli in young adults.
    Harkrider AW; Plyler PN; Hedrick MS
    Ear Hear; 2009 Feb; 30(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 19125025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Event-related potentials to visual, auditory, and bimodal (combined auditory-visual) stimuli.
    Isoğlu-Alkaç U; Kedzior K; Keskindemirci G; Ermutlu N; Karamursel S
    Int J Neurosci; 2007 Feb; 117(2):259-73. PubMed ID: 17365112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Effect of Signal to Noise Ratio on Cortical Auditory-Evoked Potentials Elicited to Speech Stimuli in Infants and Adults With Normal Hearing.
    Small SA; Sharma M; Bradford M; Mandikal Vasuki PR
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):305-317. PubMed ID: 28863034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cortical auditory evoked potential in aging: effects of stimulus intensity and noise.
    Kim JR; Ahn SY; Jeong SW; Kim LS; Park JS; Chung SH; Oh MK
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Sep; 33(7):1105-12. PubMed ID: 22892802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Stimulus experience modifies auditory neuromagnetic responses in young and older listeners.
    Ross B; Tremblay K
    Hear Res; 2009 Feb; 248(1-2):48-59. PubMed ID: 19110047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. ERP indicators of learning in adults.
    Key AP; Molfese DL; Ratajczak ED
    Dev Neuropsychol; 2006; 29(2):379-95. PubMed ID: 16515411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Is discrimination training necessary to cause changes in the P2 auditory event-related brain potential to speech sounds?
    Sheehan KA; McArthur GM; Bishop DV
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Oct; 25(2):547-53. PubMed ID: 16198089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Repeated stimulus exposure alters the way sound is encoded in the human brain.
    Tremblay KL; Inoue K; McClannahan K; Ross B
    PLoS One; 2010 Apr; 5(4):e10283. PubMed ID: 20421969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Human evoked cortical activity to silent gaps in noise: effects of age, attention, and cortical processing speed.
    Harris KC; Wilson S; Eckert MA; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):330-9. PubMed ID: 22374321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Orienting and maintenance of spatial attention in audition and vision: an event-related brain potential study.
    Salmi J; Rinne T; Degerman A; Alho K
    Eur J Neurosci; 2007 Jun; 25(12):3725-33. PubMed ID: 17610592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.