508 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19028546)
1. Evoked activity and EEG phase resetting in the genesis of auditory Go/NoGo ERPs.
Barry RJ
Biol Psychol; 2009 Mar; 80(3):292-9. PubMed ID: 19028546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Brain dynamics in the auditory oddball task as a function of stimulus intensity and task requirements.
Barry RJ; Rushby JA; Smith JL; Clarke AR; Croft RJ
Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Sep; 73(3):313-25. PubMed ID: 19460406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Brain dynamics in the auditory Go/NoGo task as a function of EEG frequency.
Barry RJ; De Blasio F; Rushby JA; Clarke AR
Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Nov; 78(2):115-28. PubMed ID: 20600367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. EEG-ERP phase dynamics of children in the auditory Go/NoGo task.
Barry RJ; De Blasio FM
Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Dec; 86(3):251-61. PubMed ID: 23046586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Preferred EEG brain states at stimulus onset in a fixed interstimulus interval equiprobable auditory Go/NoGo task: a definitive study.
Barry RJ; De Blasio FM; De Pascalis V; Karamacoska D
Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Oct; 94(1):42-58. PubMed ID: 25043955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Theta EEG dynamics of the error-related negativity.
Trujillo LT; Allen JJ
Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Mar; 118(3):645-68. PubMed ID: 17223380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Brain dynamics in the active vs. passive auditory oddball task: exploration of narrow-band EEG phase effects.
Barry RJ; Rushby JA; Smith JL; Clarke AR; Croft RJ; Wallace MJ
Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Oct; 118(10):2234-47. PubMed ID: 17709297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Modulation of spectral power and of phase resetting of EEG contributes differentially to the generation of auditory event-related potentials.
Fuentemilla L; Marco-Pallarés J; Grau C
Neuroimage; 2006 Apr; 30(3):909-16. PubMed ID: 16376575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Neural bases of cognitive ERPs: more than phase reset.
Fell J; Dietl T; Grunwald T; Kurthen M; Klaver P; Trautner P; Schaller C; Elger CE; Fernández G
J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Nov; 16(9):1595-604. PubMed ID: 15601521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. EEG spectral dynamics during discrimination of auditory and visual targets.
Mazaheri A; Picton TW
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Jun; 24(1):81-96. PubMed ID: 15922161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Human EEG very high frequency oscillations reflect the number of matches with a template in auditory short-term memory.
Lenz D; Jeschke M; Schadow J; Naue N; Ohl FW; Herrmann CS
Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1220():81-92. PubMed ID: 18036577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Gender-specific development of auditory information processing in children: an ERP study.
Nanova P; Lyamova L; Hadjigeorgieva M; Kolev V; Yordanova J
Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Sep; 119(9):1992-2003. PubMed ID: 18579438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Single-trial EEG power and phase dynamics associated with voluntary response inhibition.
Yamanaka K; Yamamoto Y
J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Apr; 22(4):714-27. PubMed ID: 19413474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Event-related potentials in the auditory oddball as a function of EEG alpha phase at stimulus onset.
Barry RJ; Rushby JA; Johnstone SJ; Clarke AR; Croft RJ; Lawrence CA
Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Nov; 115(11):2593-601. PubMed ID: 15465449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. EEG phase reset due to auditory attention: an inverse time-scale approach.
Low YF; Strauss DJ
Physiol Meas; 2009 Aug; 30(8):821-32. PubMed ID: 19567938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dynamics of narrow-band EEG phase effects in the passive auditory oddball task.
Barry RJ; Rushby JA; Smith JL; Clarke AR; Croft RJ
Eur J Neurosci; 2006 Jul; 24(1):291-304. PubMed ID: 16882025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Alpha phase reset contributes to the generation of ERPs.
Hanslmayr S; Klimesch W; Sauseng P; Gruber W; Doppelmayr M; Freunberger R; Pecherstorfer T; Birbaumer N
Cereb Cortex; 2007 Jan; 17(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 16452640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of pre-stimulus processing on subsequent events in a warned Go/NoGo paradigm: response preparation, execution and inhibition.
Smith JL; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Aug; 61(2):121-33. PubMed ID: 16214250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stimulus-to-matching-stimulus interval influences N1, P2, and P3b in an equiprobable Go/NoGo task.
Steiner GZ; Barry RJ; Gonsalvez CJ
Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Oct; 94(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 25034341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative analysis of event-related potentials during Go/NoGo and CPT: decomposition of electrophysiological markers of response inhibition and sustained attention.
Kirmizi-Alsan E; Bayraktaroglu Z; Gurvit H; Keskin YH; Emre M; Demiralp T
Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1104(1):114-28. PubMed ID: 16824492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
