These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19029128)

  • 1. Impact of allelic dropout on evidential value of forensic DNA profiles using RMNE.
    Van Nieuwerburgh F; Goetghebeur E; Vandewoestyne M; Deforce D
    Bioinformatics; 2009 Jan; 25(2):225-9. PubMed ID: 19029128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of multiple allelic drop-outs in forensic RMNE calculations.
    Christophe VN; Dieter D; Filip VN
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 Nov; 19():243-249. PubMed ID: 26280568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exclusion probabilities and likelihood ratios with applications to mixtures.
    Slooten KJ; Egeland T
    Int J Legal Med; 2016 Jan; 130(1):39-57. PubMed ID: 26160753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inclusion probability with dropout: an operational formula.
    Milot E; Courteau J; Crispino F; Mailly F
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 May; 16():71-76. PubMed ID: 25559642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating forensic DNA profiles using peak heights, allowing for multiple donors, allelic dropout and stutters.
    Puch-Solis R; Rodgers L; Mazumder A; Pope S; Evett I; Curran J; Balding D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2013 Sep; 7(5):555-63. PubMed ID: 23948327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interpretation of complex DNA profiles using empirical models and a method to measure their robustness.
    Gill P; Curran J; Neumann C; Kirkham A; Clayton T; Whitaker J; Lambert J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Mar; 2(2):91-103. PubMed ID: 19083804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dealing with allelic dropout when reporting the evidential value in DNA relatedness analysis.
    Buckleton J; Triggs C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Jul; 160(2-3):134-9. PubMed ID: 16226419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing the evidential value of DNA profiles matching without using the assumption of independent loci.
    Sudbury AW; Marinopoulos J; Gunn P
    J Forensic Sci Soc; 1993; 33(2):73-82. PubMed ID: 8360607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Distinguishing between donors and their relatives in complex DNA mixtures with binary models.
    Slooten K
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Mar; 21():95-109. PubMed ID: 26745184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Familial searching on DNA mixtures with dropout.
    Slooten K
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():128-138. PubMed ID: 26905597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Models and implementation for relationship problems with dropout.
    Dørum G; Kling D; Baeza-Richer C; García-Magariños M; Sæbø S; Desmyter S; Egeland T
    Int J Legal Med; 2015 May; 129(3):411-23. PubMed ID: 25108449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Likelihood-based inference for genetic correlation coefficients.
    Balding DJ
    Theor Popul Biol; 2003 May; 63(3):221-30. PubMed ID: 12689793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accurate assessment of the weight of evidence for DNA mixtures by integrating the likelihood ratio.
    Slooten K
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Mar; 27():1-16. PubMed ID: 27914277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Yara Gambirasio case: Combining evidence in a complex DNA mixture case.
    Graversen T; Mortera J; Lago G
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 May; 40():52-63. PubMed ID: 30776772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A universal strategy to interpret DNA profiles that does not require a definition of low-copy-number.
    Gill P; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2010 Jul; 4(4):221-7. PubMed ID: 20457049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. RMNE calculation in forensic profiles with a high number of loci and allelic drop-outs using polynomial expansion.
    Willems S; Cornelis S; Gansemans Y; Broeckx B; De Coninck DI; Van Neste C; Dhaenens M; Deforce D; Van Nieuwerburgh F
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Jan; 26():e14-e16. PubMed ID: 27856144
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The DNA database search controversy.
    Balding DJ
    Biometrics; 2002 Mar; 58(1):241-4. PubMed ID: 11890322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Population genetics in the forensic DNA debate.
    Weir BS
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1992 Dec; 89(24):11654-9. PubMed ID: 1465380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Melting curve SNP (McSNP) genotyping: a useful approach for diallelic genotyping in forensic science.
    Ye J; Parra EJ; Sosnoski DM; Hiester K; Underhill PA; Shriver MD
    J Forensic Sci; 2002 May; 47(3):593-600. PubMed ID: 12051343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Forensic identification of an individual in complex DNA mixtures.
    Voskoboinik L; Darvasi A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Nov; 5(5):428-35. PubMed ID: 20888313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.