232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19029615)
21. Biomechanical evaluation and comparison of polyetheretherketone rod system to traditional titanium rod fixation.
Ponnappan RK; Serhan H; Zarda B; Patel R; Albert T; Vaccaro AR
Spine J; 2009 Mar; 9(3):263-7. PubMed ID: 18838341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Biomechanical rationale for using polyetheretherketone (PEEK) spacers for lumbar interbody fusion-A finite element study.
Vadapalli S; Sairyo K; Goel VK; Robon M; Biyani A; Khandha A; Ebraheim NA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Dec; 31(26):E992-8. PubMed ID: 17172990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Could junctional problems at the end of a long construct be addressed by providing a graduated reduction in stiffness? A biomechanical investigation.
Durrani A; Jain V; Desai R; Bucklen B; Ingalhalikar A; Muzumdar A; Moldavsky M; Khalil S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jan; 37(1):E16-22. PubMed ID: 21540778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Biomechanical assessment of a novel L4/5 level interspinous implant using three dimensional finite element analysis.
Song C; Li XF; Liu ZD; Zhong GB
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2014; 18(1):86-94. PubMed ID: 24452948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Load transfer characteristics between posterior spinal implants and the lumbar spine under anterior shear loading: an in vitro investigation.
Melnyk AD; Wen TL; Kingwell S; Chak JD; Singh V; Cripton PA; Fisher CG; Dvorak MF; Oxland TR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Aug; 37(18):E1126-33. PubMed ID: 22565384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Determination of the biomechanical effect of an interspinous process device on implanted and adjacent lumbar spinal segments using a hybrid testing protocol: a finite-element study.
Erbulut DU; Zafarparandeh I; Hassan CR; Lazoglu I; Ozer AF
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Aug; 23(2):200-8. PubMed ID: 25932601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Spinal motion and intradiscal pressure measurements before and after lumbar spine instrumentation with titanium or PEEK rods.
Abode-Iyamah K; Kim SB; Grosland N; Kumar R; Belirgen M; Lim TH; Torner J; Hitchon PW
J Clin Neurosci; 2014 Apr; 21(4):651-5. PubMed ID: 24314848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Biomechanical evaluation of a dynamic pedicle screw fixation device.
Xu HZ; Wang XY; Chi YL; Zhu QA; Lin Y; Huang QS; Dai LY
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 May; 21(4):330-6. PubMed ID: 16434133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Biomechanical evaluation of pedicle screw-based dynamic stabilization devices for the lumbar spine: a systematic review.
Barrey CY; Ponnappan RK; Song J; Vaccaro AR
SAS J; 2008; 2(4):159-70. PubMed ID: 25802618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Influence of screw augmentation in posterior dynamic and rigid stabilization systems in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae: a biomechanical cadaveric study.
Hoppe S; Loosli Y; Baumgartner D; Heini P; Benneker L
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Mar; 39(6):E384-9. PubMed ID: 24384660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A study to compare the efficacy of polyether ether ketone rod device with titanium devices in posterior spinal fusion in a canine model.
Wang N; Xie H; Xi C; Zhang H; Yan J
J Orthop Surg Res; 2017 Mar; 12(1):40. PubMed ID: 28279204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Clinical and biomechanical researches of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) rods for semi-rigid lumbar fusion: a systematic review.
Li C; Liu L; Shi JY; Yan KZ; Shen WZ; Yang ZR
Neurosurg Rev; 2018 Apr; 41(2):375-389. PubMed ID: 27392677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Biomechanics of polyaryletherketone rod composites and titanium rods for posterior lumbosacral instrumentation. Presented at the 2010 Joint Spine Section Meeting. Laboratory investigation.
Bruner HJ; Guan Y; Yoganandan N; Pintar FA; Maiman DJ; Slivka MA
J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Dec; 13(6):766-72. PubMed ID: 21121756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Use of instrumented pedicle screws to evaluate load sharing in posterior dynamic stabilization systems.
Meyers K; Tauber M; Sudin Y; Fleischer S; Arnin U; Girardi F; Wright T
Spine J; 2008; 8(6):926-32. PubMed ID: 18037350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Biomechanics of dynamic rod segments for achieving transitional stiffness with lumbosacral fusion.
Lazaro BC; Reyes PM; Newcomb AG; Yaqoobi AS; Brasiliense LB; Sonntag VK; Crawford NR
Neurosurgery; 2013 Sep; 73(3):517-27. PubMed ID: 23756746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A unique modular implant system enhances load sharing in anterior cervical interbody fusion: a finite element study.
Palepu V; Kiapour A; Goel VK; Moran JM
Biomed Eng Online; 2014 Mar; 13(1):26. PubMed ID: 24618205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The effect of non-fusion dynamic stabilization on biomechanical responses of the implanted lumbar spine during whole-body vibration.
Fan W; Guo LX
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Aug; 192():105441. PubMed ID: 32172078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Biomechanics of adjacent segments after a multilevel cervical corpectomy using anterior, posterior, and combined anterior-posterior instrumentation techniques: a finite element model study.
Hussain M; Nassr A; Natarajan RN; An HS; Andersson GB
Spine J; 2013 Jun; 13(6):689-96. PubMed ID: 23578989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Biomechanical analysis of screw load sharing in pedicle fixation of the lumbar spine.
Kostuik JP; Munting E; Valdevit A
J Spinal Disord; 1994 Oct; 7(5):394-401. PubMed ID: 7819639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Evaluation of load transfer characteristics of a dynamic stabilization device on disc loading under compression.
Zhang QH; Zhou YL; Petit D; Teo EC
Med Eng Phys; 2009 Jun; 31(5):533-8. PubMed ID: 19038569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
