These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19030668)

  • 1. [Studies about diagnostic tests: interpreting the results].
    Salech F; Mery V; Larrondo F; Rada G
    Rev Med Chil; 2008 Sep; 136(9):1203-8. PubMed ID: 19030668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing the gain in diagnostic performance when combining two diagnostic tests.
    Macaskill P; Walter SD; Irwig L; Franco EL
    Stat Med; 2002 Sep; 21(17):2527-46. PubMed ID: 12205697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Re: Insights into latent class analysis of diagnostic test performance.
    Formann AK; Böhning D
    Biostatistics; 2008 Oct; 9(4):777-8. PubMed ID: 18718923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The diagnostic utility of multiple-level likelihood ratios.
    Bowden SC; Loring DW
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2009 Sep; 15(5):769-76. PubMed ID: 19635177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Proteomics and cancer: running before we can walk?
    Check E
    Nature; 2004 Jun; 429(6991):496-7. PubMed ID: 15175721
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Validity of diagnostic tests].
    Valenzuela D L; Cifuentes A L
    Rev Med Chil; 2008 Mar; 136(3):401-4. PubMed ID: 18575669
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Advantages to transforming the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve into likelihood ratio co-ordinates.
    Johnson NP
    Stat Med; 2004 Jul; 23(14):2257-66. PubMed ID: 15236429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating validity of screening tests.
    Larson E
    Nurs Res; 1986; 35(3):186-8. PubMed ID: 3635057
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measures of accuracy and performance of diagnostic tests.
    Drobatz KJ
    J Vet Cardiol; 2009 May; 11 Suppl 1():S33-40. PubMed ID: 19451045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Understanding and critically appraising evidence about diagnostic tests.
    Garvan CW
    PM R; 2010 Mar; 2(3):182-6. PubMed ID: 20359682
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Diagnostic likelihood ratios].
    Capron L
    Rev Prat; 2000 Nov; 50(17):1865-9. PubMed ID: 11151325
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Weighted 2 x 2 kappa coefficients: recommended indices of diagnostic accuracy for evidence-based practice.
    Gilchrist JM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Oct; 62(10):1045-53. PubMed ID: 19278830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests].
    Smets P
    Rev Med Brux; 1985 Sep; 6(7):451-4. PubMed ID: 4081407
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Appropriate statistical methods are required to assess diagnostic tests for replacement, add-on, and triage.
    Hayen A; Macaskill P; Irwig L; Bossuyt P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Aug; 63(8):883-91. PubMed ID: 20079607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of a diagnostic test].
    Nendaz MR; Perrier A
    Rev Mal Respir; 2004 Apr; 21(2 Pt 1):390-3. PubMed ID: 15211250
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Evidence-based pediatrics: diagnostic tests (1st part)].
    Demirdjian G; Berlín V; Rowensztein H
    Arch Argent Pediatr; 2009 Dec; 107(6):527-35. PubMed ID: 20049398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Applying results from studies on diagnostic tests].
    Rivera M S; Letelier S LM
    Rev Med Chil; 2011 May; 139(5):672-5. PubMed ID: 22051721
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Criteria for evaluating the performance and utility of a diagnostic test].
    Mancini J; Gaudart J; Giorgi R
    Med Trop (Mars); 2009 Feb; 69(1):78-82. PubMed ID: 19499742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Insights into latent class analysis of diagnostic test performance.
    Pepe MS; Janes H
    Biostatistics; 2007 Apr; 8(2):474-84. PubMed ID: 17085745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pitfalls of internet-accessible diagnostic tests: inadequate performance of a CE-marked Chlamydia test for home use.
    Michel CE; Saison FG; Joshi H; Mahilum-Tapay LM; Lee HH
    Sex Transm Infect; 2009 Jun; 85(3):187-9. PubMed ID: 19398434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.