264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19030668)
1. [Studies about diagnostic tests: interpreting the results].
Salech F; Mery V; Larrondo F; Rada G
Rev Med Chil; 2008 Sep; 136(9):1203-8. PubMed ID: 19030668
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessing the gain in diagnostic performance when combining two diagnostic tests.
Macaskill P; Walter SD; Irwig L; Franco EL
Stat Med; 2002 Sep; 21(17):2527-46. PubMed ID: 12205697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Re: Insights into latent class analysis of diagnostic test performance.
Formann AK; Böhning D
Biostatistics; 2008 Oct; 9(4):777-8. PubMed ID: 18718923
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The diagnostic utility of multiple-level likelihood ratios.
Bowden SC; Loring DW
J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2009 Sep; 15(5):769-76. PubMed ID: 19635177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Proteomics and cancer: running before we can walk?
Check E
Nature; 2004 Jun; 429(6991):496-7. PubMed ID: 15175721
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Validity of diagnostic tests].
Valenzuela D L; Cifuentes A L
Rev Med Chil; 2008 Mar; 136(3):401-4. PubMed ID: 18575669
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Advantages to transforming the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve into likelihood ratio co-ordinates.
Johnson NP
Stat Med; 2004 Jul; 23(14):2257-66. PubMed ID: 15236429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluating validity of screening tests.
Larson E
Nurs Res; 1986; 35(3):186-8. PubMed ID: 3635057
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Measures of accuracy and performance of diagnostic tests.
Drobatz KJ
J Vet Cardiol; 2009 May; 11 Suppl 1():S33-40. PubMed ID: 19451045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Understanding and critically appraising evidence about diagnostic tests.
Garvan CW
PM R; 2010 Mar; 2(3):182-6. PubMed ID: 20359682
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Diagnostic likelihood ratios].
Capron L
Rev Prat; 2000 Nov; 50(17):1865-9. PubMed ID: 11151325
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Weighted 2 x 2 kappa coefficients: recommended indices of diagnostic accuracy for evidence-based practice.
Gilchrist JM
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Oct; 62(10):1045-53. PubMed ID: 19278830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests].
Smets P
Rev Med Brux; 1985 Sep; 6(7):451-4. PubMed ID: 4081407
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Appropriate statistical methods are required to assess diagnostic tests for replacement, add-on, and triage.
Hayen A; Macaskill P; Irwig L; Bossuyt P
J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Aug; 63(8):883-91. PubMed ID: 20079607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of a diagnostic test].
Nendaz MR; Perrier A
Rev Mal Respir; 2004 Apr; 21(2 Pt 1):390-3. PubMed ID: 15211250
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Evidence-based pediatrics: diagnostic tests (1st part)].
Demirdjian G; Berlín V; Rowensztein H
Arch Argent Pediatr; 2009 Dec; 107(6):527-35. PubMed ID: 20049398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Applying results from studies on diagnostic tests].
Rivera M S; Letelier S LM
Rev Med Chil; 2011 May; 139(5):672-5. PubMed ID: 22051721
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Criteria for evaluating the performance and utility of a diagnostic test].
Mancini J; Gaudart J; Giorgi R
Med Trop (Mars); 2009 Feb; 69(1):78-82. PubMed ID: 19499742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Insights into latent class analysis of diagnostic test performance.
Pepe MS; Janes H
Biostatistics; 2007 Apr; 8(2):474-84. PubMed ID: 17085745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pitfalls of internet-accessible diagnostic tests: inadequate performance of a CE-marked Chlamydia test for home use.
Michel CE; Saison FG; Joshi H; Mahilum-Tapay LM; Lee HH
Sex Transm Infect; 2009 Jun; 85(3):187-9. PubMed ID: 19398434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
