264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19030668)
21. Evidence-based medicine in otolaryngology Part 4: everyday probabilities--nonbinary diagnostic tests.
Shin JJ; Stinnett SS; Randolph GW
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Aug; 149(2):179-86. PubMed ID: 23715687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 5. Diagnostic accuracy studies.
Manchikanti L; Derby R; Wolfer L; Singh V; Datta S; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(3):517-40. PubMed ID: 19461821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Performance evaluation (validation) of diagnosis].
Röding H; Schenke K
Zentralbl Chir; 1987; 112(16):1001-10. PubMed ID: 3673309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Using evaluations of diagnostic tests: understanding their limitations and making the most of available evidence.
Deeks JJ
Ann Oncol; 1999 Jul; 10(7):761-8. PubMed ID: 10470421
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Using and interpreting diagnostic tests.
McKenna SL; Dohoo IR
Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract; 2006 Mar; 22(1):195-205. PubMed ID: 16517302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. An evidence-based approach to test accuracy studies in gynecologic oncology: the 'STARD' checklist.
Selman TJ; Khan KS; Mann CH
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Mar; 96(3):575-8. PubMed ID: 15721396
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. [The difficult art of evidence interpretation--benefit of sensitivity and specificity].
Herrström P; Lindberg A; Brodin B; Hernborg A
Lakartidningen; 2003 Jan; 100(3):158-9. PubMed ID: 12596486
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. On testing independence of repeated screening tests.
Xu JL; Prorok PC
J Med Screen; 2009; 16(1):50; author reply 51. PubMed ID: 19349533
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Testing diagnostic tests: why size matters.
Funk MJ; LeGrys VA
J Pediatr; 2005 Feb; 146(2):159-62. PubMed ID: 15689897
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. How to use an article about a diagnostic test.
Scales CD; Dahm P; Sultan S; Campbell-Scherer D; Devereaux PJ
J Urol; 2008 Aug; 180(2):469-76. PubMed ID: 18550109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Cautionary tales in the clinical interpretation of studies of diagnostic tests.
Scott IA; Greenberg PB; Poole PJ
Intern Med J; 2008 Feb; 38(2):120-9. PubMed ID: 17645501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Diagnostic tests--use and interpretation].
Asberg A
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1993 Feb; 113(5):604-8. PubMed ID: 8465320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Use of likelihood ratio computation to standardize the predictive power of noninvasive cardiovascular tests.
Montori VM; Ebbert JO
Mayo Clin Proc; 2000 Apr; 75(4):423-4. PubMed ID: 10761502
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Evidence-based guidelines for the use of immunologic tests: antinuclear antibody testing.
Solomon DH; Kavanaugh AJ; Schur PH;
Arthritis Rheum; 2002 Aug; 47(4):434-44. PubMed ID: 12209492
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines: Part 2 of 3. The GRADE approach to grading quality of evidence about diagnostic tests and strategies.
Brozek JL; Akl EA; Jaeschke R; Lang DM; Bossuyt P; Glasziou P; Helfand M; Ueffing E; Alonso-Coello P; Meerpohl J; Phillips B; Horvath AR; Bousquet J; Guyatt GH; Schünemann HJ;
Allergy; 2009 Aug; 64(8):1109-16. PubMed ID: 19489757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Knowing how to read a scientific article. 4. Knowing how to apply a diagnostic test].
Coggiola M; Bobbio M; Bongioanni S; Demichelis B; Longo M
G Ital Cardiol; 1995 Sep; 25(9):1211-22. PubMed ID: 8529859
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of the likelihood ratios of two binary diagnostic tests in paired designs.
Nofuentes JA; Del Castillo Jde D
Stat Med; 2007 Sep; 26(22):4179-201. PubMed ID: 17357992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Value of information methods for assessing a new diagnostic test.
Chen MH; Willan AR
Stat Med; 2014 May; 33(11):1801-15. PubMed ID: 24403241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Number needed to misdiagnose: a measure of diagnostic test effectiveness.
Habibzadeh F; Yadollahie M
Epidemiology; 2013 Jan; 24(1):170. PubMed ID: 23232619
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Critical appraisal for emergency medicine: 5 Evaluation of a diagnostic test.
Goodacre S
Emerg Med J; 2009 Jan; 26(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 19104103
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
