148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1903152)
1. Health maintenance organizations: structure, performance, and current issues for employee health benefits design.
Gold M
J Occup Med; 1991 Mar; 33(3):288-96. PubMed ID: 1903152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multiple HMO/indemnity plan supplement design: a managed care strategy for employers with high HMO enrollment.
Cave DG
Empl Benefits J; 1992 Mar; 17(1):22-5. PubMed ID: 10117471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Measuring the economic value of HMOs.
Beauregard TR
Benefits Q; 1995; 11(2):16-8. PubMed ID: 10142757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rapid change to HMO systems: profile of the Dane County, Wisconsin, experience.
Scheckler WE; Schulz R
J Fam Pract; 1987 Apr; 24(4):417-24. PubMed ID: 3559496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Employer demands lower cost.
Scroggins ES
Manag Care Q; 1994; 2(1):72-6; discussion 87-8. PubMed ID: 10132796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Employer-sponsored Medicare HMO strategies: common selection criteria.
Paik JY
Manag Care Q; 1997; 5(4):55-61. PubMed ID: 10175721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Awakening consumer stewardship of health benefits: prevalence and differentiation of new health plan models.
Rosenthal M; Milstein A
Health Serv Res; 2004 Aug; 39(4 Pt 2):1055-70. PubMed ID: 15230911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An opportunity for HMOs to use marketing to increase enrollee satisfaction.
Dwore RB; Murray BP; Parsons RP; Gustafson G
Manag Care; 2001 Jan; 10(1):38-9, 43-5, 49-52 passim. PubMed ID: 11211329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A closer look at the managed care backlash.
Cooper PF; Simon KI; Vistnes J
Med Care; 2006 May; 44(5 Suppl):I4-11. PubMed ID: 16625063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dissecting the HMO-benefits managers relationship: what to measure and why.
Peltier JW; Westfall J
Mark Health Serv; 2000; 20(2):4-13. PubMed ID: 11183429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Can managed care save Medicare? Achieving high quality and low costs through managed care.
Giffin R
Manag Care Q; 1996; 4(4):12-29. PubMed ID: 10162547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the effect of a consumer-driven health plan on medical care expenditures and utilization.
Parente ST; Feldman R; Christianson JB
Health Serv Res; 2004 Aug; 39(4 Pt 2):1189-210. PubMed ID: 15230920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does competition by health maintenance organizations affect the adoption of cost-containment measures by fee-for-service plans?
Joesch JM; Wickizer TM; Feldstein PJ
Am J Manag Care; 1998 Jun; 4(6):832-8. PubMed ID: 10181069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Differences in prescription drug use in HMO and self-insured health plans.
Wallack SS; Thomas CP; Martin TC; Ryan A
Med Care Res Rev; 2007 Feb; 64(1):98-116. PubMed ID: 17213460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Report cards: employers demand accountability.
Russ Coiles Health Trends; 1995 Nov; 8(1):5-7. PubMed ID: 10153079
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Teaming up with employers against HMOs.
Terry K
Med Econ; 1995 Oct; 72(19):54, 59-60, 63 passim. PubMed ID: 10152024
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Out of plan. Certain HMO characteristics affect physicians' satisfaction and influence their decision to reenroll.
Lamb CW; Baker J; Gates R
Mark Health Serv; 1998; 18(3):26-33. PubMed ID: 10185306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Employer management of employee health plans.
Stanfield CR
Am J Hosp Pharm; 1990 Sep; 47(9):2053-5. PubMed ID: 2220862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. When the fine print changes. What should you do if your HMO cuts back on benefits?
Spragins EE
Newsweek; 1998 Mar; 131(10):66. PubMed ID: 10177042
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Employee contributions: a primer on their use, historical trends and overall fit within benefits strategy.
Peters HA
Benefits Q; 2007; 23(3):46-55. PubMed ID: 17886733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
