148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1903152)
21. The role of service recovery in HMO satisfaction.
Sarel D; Marmorstein H
Mark Health Serv; 1999; 19(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 10351398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Simulating the effects of employer contributions on adverse selection and health plan choice.
Marquis MS; Buchanan JL
Health Serv Res; 1999 Oct; 34(4):813-37. PubMed ID: 10536972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. What is the HMO Act and what is its impact on employers?
Sloan A
Employee Relat Law J; 1979; 4(4):608-12. PubMed ID: 10294900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. When the physician's plan becomes the customer's health maintenance organization.
Monfiletto E
Manag Care Q; 1994; 2(1):83-4. PubMed ID: 10132799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Community HMO built by Ford.
Shelton JK
Hospitals; 1979 Aug; 53(16):79-80, 85. PubMed ID: 110665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Public sector employer evaluation of health plans in the United States.
Perry RW; Cayer NJ
Int J Health Plann Manage; 1998; 13(4):259-75. PubMed ID: 10346049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of inpatient utilization to optimal standards.
Dymowski RJ
Manag Care Q; 1997; 5(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 10164648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Case study: Southern Wine & Spirits. The employer as benefits connoisseur.
Meltsner S
Bus Health; 1997 Dec; 15(12):19-23. PubMed ID: 10175495
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Medicare risk HMOs: careful consideration can yield rewards.
Marlowe JF; Childress HK
Empl Benefits J; 1995 Sep; 20(3):2-8, 11. PubMed ID: 10151236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A sign of the times.
Barnett B; Bryant JS
Benefits Q; 2001; 17(4):84-6. PubMed ID: 11727478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Designing benefits that are good for employees and for business.
Kreig J; Hergenrader R
Health Care Strateg Manage; 1997 Oct; 15(10):1, 21-3. PubMed ID: 10173409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Consumer-driven health care: the future is now.
Bachman RE
Benefits Q; 2004; 20(2):15-22. PubMed ID: 15146749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Impact of step-rating and price sensitivity on disenrollment and risk selection: the experience of a group practice HMO.
Wintringham K
Group Health J; 1982; 3(2):15-20. PubMed ID: 10256505
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Survey search: employers and employees look at HMOs.
Health Cost Manage; 1987; 4(3):30-8. PubMed ID: 10282131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. When it comes to measuring value, few HMOs can make the grade.
MacStravic S
Manag Care Q; 2001; 9(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 11252390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Consumer choice and tiered networks--two sides of the same coin?
Baumgarten A
Manag Care Q; 2003; 11(1):54-5. PubMed ID: 12790070
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Quality and employers' choice of health plans.
Chernew M; Gowrisankaran G; McLaughlin C; Gibson T
J Health Econ; 2004 May; 23(3):471-92. PubMed ID: 15120466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Defined contribution health plan to consumer driven health benefits: evolution and experience.
Patterson MP
Benefits Q; 2004; 20(2):49-59. PubMed ID: 15146754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Impact of HMO ownership on management processes and utilization outcomes.
Ahern M; Molinari C
Am J Manag Care; 2001 May; 7(5):489-97. PubMed ID: 11388128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Premium hikes: no cause for celebration.
Diamond F
Manag Care; 2002 Jul; 11(7):28-33. PubMed ID: 12219373
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
