These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1903160)
1. On feeding tubes. McIntyre RV J Okla State Med Assoc; 1991 Mar; 84(3):97. PubMed ID: 1903160 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Removal of a nutrient feeding tube and the need for a living will. Squillace SE J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1987; 3():253-80. PubMed ID: 10312081 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Nutritional discontinuation: active or passive euthanasia? Banja JD J Neurosci Nurs; 1990 Apr; 22(2):117-20. PubMed ID: 2139682 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Getting down to cases. Scofield GR Issues Law Med; 1991; 7(2):213-26. PubMed ID: 1938336 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Death by deliberate dehydration and starvation: silent echoes of the Hungerhäuser. Dolan JM Issues Law Med; 1991; 7(2):173-97. PubMed ID: 1938334 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Withholding/withdrawing artificial feeding: legal status. Rouse F New Physician; 1987; 36(4):55-6. PubMed ID: 10312084 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Compassionate withholding of feeding: are physicians protected? Champlin L Geriatrics; 1987 Jan; 42(1):37-40, 42. PubMed ID: 3100397 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Artificial feeding and patients' rights: recent developments and recommendations. Cohen EN; Cohen MM Med Staff Couns; 1988; 2(3):23-35. PubMed ID: 10312561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Right-to-die decisions point to need for clear policies. Rouse F; Cohen EN; Gasner MR Provider; 1988 Mar; 14(3):18, 24. PubMed ID: 10312416 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The case of Mr. Stevens. Cranford RE Issues Law Med; 1991; 7(2):199-211. PubMed ID: 1938335 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The Cruzan case: who has the right to decide? Johnson SH Health Prog; 1989 Nov; 70(9):22-5. PubMed ID: 10313361 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. AMA stand on feeding tubes rapped, praised. Med World News; 1986 Apr; 27(8):28-9, 32. PubMed ID: 10311518 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The decision to withdraw tube feeding. Murakami JF; Wong WF Hawaii Med J; 1995 Apr; 54(4):485-9. PubMed ID: 7601671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Choices: the ethics of dying pose new challenges for caregivers. Buss DD Contemp Longterm Care; 1994 Mar; 17(3):40-1, 43, 45-7. PubMed ID: 10132980 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Supreme Court to examine withdrawal of nutrition and hydration. Costa L Contemp Longterm Care; 1990 Jan; 13(1):61-2. PubMed ID: 10113080 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The travail and triumph of Sidney Greenspan. Vaux K J Allied Health; 1991; 20(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 1904413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Supreme Court speaks on treatment refusal: the Cruzan case. Miller RD Hosp Law Newsl; 1990 Oct; 7(12):1-5. PubMed ID: 10113332 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Perspectives. High court tackles right-to-die. Olson E Mcgraw Hills Med Health; 1989 Aug; 43(31):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10294181 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Is there a right to die? Van Biema D Time; 1997 Jan; 149(2):60-1. PubMed ID: 10164134 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]