469 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19031656)
1. The end of privacy.
Rubenfeld J
Stanford Law Rev; 2008 Oct; 61(1):101-62. PubMed ID: 19031656
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Dentists and Protection of Personal Information Act, 2013 ("POPI").
Govan P
SADJ; 2014 Mar; 69(2):78-80. PubMed ID: 24974523
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Marching to the beat of a different drummer: is military law and mental health out-of-step after Jaffee v. Redmond?
Zanotti BJ; Becker RA
Air Force Law Rev; 1997; 41():1-82. PubMed ID: 16211752
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Competing interests and gamete donation: the case for anonymity.
Sauer JL
Seton Hall Law Rev; 2009; 39(3):919-54. PubMed ID: 19650254
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. "I could tell you, but then I'd have to kill you": classified information in the psychiatric evaluation.
Malone RD; Benedek DM
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2002; 30(2):232-7. PubMed ID: 12108560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A crosswalk between the final HIPAA privacy rule and existing federal substance abuse confidentiality requirements.
Kamoie B; Borzi P
Issue Brief George Wash Univ Cent Health Serv Res Policy; 2001 Aug; (18-19):1-52. PubMed ID: 14982096
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A patient's right of privacy in computerized pharmacy records.
Mowery G
Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1998; 66(2):697-746. PubMed ID: 16211743
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The right to privacy and assisted reproductive technologies: a comparative study of the law of Germany and the U.S.
Voss AS
N Y Law Sch J Int Comp Law; 2002; 21(2):229-305. PubMed ID: 15212072
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Ten mistakes to avoid in preparing your Web site privacy policy.
Hirsch WR
J Oncol Manag; 2000; 9(4):8-9. PubMed ID: 11186508
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Unnecessary coercion: an end to involuntary civil commitment of retarded persons.
Dybwad G; Herr SS
Stanford Law Rev; 1979 Apr; 31(4):753-65. PubMed ID: 10242375
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. AIDS and adolescents.
Hartman RG
J Health Care Law Policy; 2004; 7(2):280-315. PubMed ID: 15573442
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Privacy and the economics of personal health care information.
Schwartz PM
Tex Law Rev; 1997 Nov; 76(1):1-75. PubMed ID: 11913433
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Handhelds and HIPAA.
Knox C; Smith A
Nurs Manage; 2007 Jun; 38(6):38-40. PubMed ID: 17538460
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. CNPS: respecting your privacy rights.
Tapp A
Can Nurse; 2004 Apr; 100(4):36-7. PubMed ID: 15124433
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Privacy and security for electronic health records.
Sharpe VA
Hastings Cent Rep; 2005; 35(6):49. PubMed ID: 16396204
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Phone service faces privacy challenge.
Gardner E
Mod Healthc; 1990 Jan; 20(3):38. PubMed ID: 10103573
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Challenging medical-legal norms. The role of autonomy, confidentiality, and privacy in protecting individual and familial group rights in genetic information.
Laurie GT
J Leg Med; 2001 Mar; 22(1):1-54. PubMed ID: 11330121
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Restraints and the elderly: when safety and autonomy conflict.
Schafer A
Can Med Assoc J; 1985 Jun; 132(11):1257-60. PubMed ID: 3995445
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Beyond Jaffee v. Redmond: should the federal courts recognize a right to physician-patient confidentiality?
Silver SA
Ohio State Law J; 1998; 58(5):1809-66. PubMed ID: 16211748
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Mandatory genetic dogtags and the Fourth Amendment: the need for a new post-Skinner test.
Scherer RC
Georgetown Law J; 1997 Jun; 85(6):2007-38. PubMed ID: 16523576
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
