These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19031771)

  • 1. [Application of Stata software to test heterogeneity in meta-analysis method].
    Wang D; Mou ZY; Zhai JX; Zong HX; Zhao XD
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Jul; 29(7):726-9. PubMed ID: 19031771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I2 index?
    Huedo-Medina TB; Sánchez-Meca J; Marín-Martínez F; Botella J
    Psychol Methods; 2006 Jun; 11(2):193-206. PubMed ID: 16784338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A graphical method for exploring heterogeneity in meta-analyses: application to a meta-analysis of 65 trials.
    Baujat B; Mahé C; Pignon JP; Hill C
    Stat Med; 2002 Sep; 21(18):2641-52. PubMed ID: 12228882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Testing for genetic heterogeneity in the genome search meta-analysis method.
    Lewis CM; Levinson DF
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 May; 30(4):348-55. PubMed ID: 16586403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Exploring heterogeneity in meta-analyses: needs, resources and challenges.
    Xu H; Platt RW; Luo ZC; Wei S; Fraser WD
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2008 Jan; 22 Suppl 1():18-28. PubMed ID: 18237348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On tests of the overall treatment effect in meta-analysis with normally distributed responses.
    Hartung J; Knapp G
    Stat Med; 2001 Jun; 20(12):1771-82. PubMed ID: 11406840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A test for publication bias in meta-analysis with sparse binary data.
    Schwarzer G; Antes G; Schumacher M
    Stat Med; 2007 Feb; 26(4):721-33. PubMed ID: 16755545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Application of Meta-regression and subgroup analyses of heterogeneity disposal in Meta-analysis].
    Shi XQ; Wang ZZ
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2008 May; 29(5):497-501. PubMed ID: 18956686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dependent effect sizes in meta-analysis: incorporating the degree of interdependence.
    Cheung SF; Chan DK
    J Appl Psychol; 2004 Oct; 89(5):780-91. PubMed ID: 15506860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies require study by study examination: first for heterogeneity, and then for sources of heterogeneity.
    Begg CB
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Sep; 58(9):865-6. PubMed ID: 16085189
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantifying, displaying and accounting for heterogeneity in the meta-analysis of RCTs using standard and generalised Q statistics.
    Bowden J; Tierney JF; Copas AJ; Burdett S
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 Apr; 11():41. PubMed ID: 21473747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Procedures that assess inconsistency in meta-analyses can assess the likelihood of response bias in multiwave surveys.
    Montori VM; Leung TW; Walter SD; Guyatt GH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Aug; 58(8):856-8. PubMed ID: 16018920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Metaplot: A new Stata module for assessing heterogeneity in a meta-analysis.
    Poorolajal J; Noornejad S
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(6):e0253341. PubMed ID: 34181682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis.
    Higgins JP; Thompson SG
    Stat Med; 2002 Jun; 21(11):1539-58. PubMed ID: 12111919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The power of the standard test for the presence of heterogeneity in meta-analysis.
    Jackson D
    Stat Med; 2006 Aug; 25(15):2688-99. PubMed ID: 16374903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interferon therapy in chronic hepatitis B reduces progression to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis.
    Yang YF; Zhao W; Zhong YD; Xia HM; Shen L; Zhang N
    J Viral Hepat; 2009 Apr; 16(4):265-71. PubMed ID: 19220736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Alternative measures of between-study heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Reducing the impact of outlying studies.
    Lin L; Chu H; Hodges JS
    Biometrics; 2017 Mar; 73(1):156-166. PubMed ID: 27167143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A model for integrating fixed-, random-, and mixed-effects meta-analyses into structural equation modeling.
    Cheung MW
    Psychol Methods; 2008 Sep; 13(3):182-202. PubMed ID: 18778151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robust variance estimation with dependent effect sizes: practical considerations including a software tutorial in Stata and spss.
    Tanner-Smith EE; Tipton E
    Res Synth Methods; 2014 Mar; 5(1):13-30. PubMed ID: 26054023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How to read a review paper.
    Callcut RA; Branson RD
    Respir Care; 2009 Oct; 54(10):1379-85. PubMed ID: 19796419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.