These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19032500)

  • 1. A change in competitive context reverses sexual selection on male size.
    Kasumovic MM; Andrade MC
    J Evol Biol; 2009 Feb; 22(2):324-33. PubMed ID: 19032500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Competing dwarf males: sexual selection in an orb-weaving spider.
    Foellmer MW; Fairbairn DJ
    J Evol Biol; 2005 May; 18(3):629-41. PubMed ID: 15842492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The form of sexual selection arising from male-male competition depends on the presence of females in the social environment.
    Procter DS; Moore AJ; Miller CW
    J Evol Biol; 2012 May; 25(5):803-12. PubMed ID: 22404372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Unexpected male choosiness for mates in a spider.
    Bel-Venner MC; Dray S; Allainé D; Menu F; Venner S
    Proc Biol Sci; 2008 Jan; 275(1630):77-82. PubMed ID: 17956845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evolutionary reduction in testes size and competitive fertilization success in response to the experimental removal of sexual selection in dung beetles.
    Simmons LW; García-González F
    Evolution; 2008 Oct; 62(10):2580-91. PubMed ID: 18691259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Temporal variation in size-assortative mating and male mate choice in a spider with amphisexual care.
    Moura RR; Gonzaga MO
    Naturwissenschaften; 2017 Apr; 104(3-4):28. PubMed ID: 28289773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimal climbing speed explains the evolution of extreme sexual size dimorphism in spiders.
    Moya-Laraño J; Vinković D; Allard CM; Foellmer MW
    J Evol Biol; 2009 May; 22(5):954-63. PubMed ID: 19243487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Size breeds success: multiple paternity, multivariate selection and male semelparity in a small marsupial, Antechinus stuartii.
    Holleley CE; Dickman CR; Crowther MS; Oldroyd BP
    Mol Ecol; 2006 Oct; 15(11):3439-48. PubMed ID: 16968281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Male-male competition, female mate choice and their interaction: determining total sexual selection.
    Hunt J; Breuker CJ; Sadowski JA; Moore AJ
    J Evol Biol; 2009 Jan; 22(1):13-26. PubMed ID: 19120810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Male choice generates stabilizing sexual selection on a female fecundity correlate.
    Chenoweth SF; Petfield D; Doughty P; Blows MW
    J Evol Biol; 2007 Sep; 20(5):1745-50. PubMed ID: 17714292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A model for the evolutionary maintenance of monogyny in spiders.
    Fromhage L; McNamara JM; Houston AI
    J Theor Biol; 2008 Feb; 250(3):524-31. PubMed ID: 18045619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Experimental manipulation of sexual selection promotes greater male mating capacity but does not alter sperm investment.
    Crudgington HS; Fellows S; Badcock NS; Snook RR
    Evolution; 2009 Apr; 63(4):926-38. PubMed ID: 19236477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evolution of sexual size dimorphism in grouse and allies (Aves: Phasianidae) in relation to mating competition, fecundity demands and resource division.
    Lislevand T; Figuerola J; Székely T
    J Evol Biol; 2009 Sep; 22(9):1895-905. PubMed ID: 19682306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Weaponry, color, and contest success in the jumping spider Lyssomanes viridis.
    Tedore C; Johnsen S
    Behav Processes; 2012 Mar; 89(3):203-11. PubMed ID: 22093800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Correlated responses to artificial body size selection in growth, development, phenotypic plasticity and juvenile viability in yellow dung flies.
    Teuschl Y; Reim C; Blanckenhorn WU
    J Evol Biol; 2007 Jan; 20(1):87-103. PubMed ID: 17210003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Can the limited marsupium space be a limiting factor for Syngnathus abaster females? Insights from a population with size-assortative mating.
    Silva K; Vieira MN; Almada VC; Monteiro NM
    J Anim Ecol; 2008 Mar; 77(2):390-4. PubMed ID: 18194263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Male-male contests for mates, sexual size dimorphism, and sex ratio in a natural population of a solitary parasitoid.
    Macedo MV; Monteiro RF; Silveira MP; Mayhew PJ
    Behav Processes; 2013 Nov; 100():1-8. PubMed ID: 23872503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Indirect mate choice, direct mate choice and species recognition in a bower-building cichlid fish lek.
    Genner MJ; Young KA; Haesler MP; Joyce DA
    J Evol Biol; 2008 Sep; 21(5):1387-96. PubMed ID: 18547351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Proximate causes of Rensch's rule: does sexual size dimorphism in arthropods result from sex differences in development time?
    Blanckenhorn WU; Dixon AF; Fairbairn DJ; Foellmer MW; Gibert P; van der Linde K; Meier R; Nylin S; Pitnick S; Schoff C; Signorelli M; Teder T; Wiklund C
    Am Nat; 2007 Feb; 169(2):245-57. PubMed ID: 17211807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Survival benefits select for group living in a social spider despite reproductive costs.
    Bilde T; Coates KS; Birkhofer K; Bird T; Maklakov AA; Lubin Y; Avilés L
    J Evol Biol; 2007 Nov; 20(6):2412-26. PubMed ID: 17956402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.