BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

798 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19032662)

  • 1. Induction of labour: a comparison between controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal pessary (Cervidil) and dinoprostone intravaginal gel (Prostin E2).
    Kho EM; Sadler L; McCowan L
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Oct; 48(5):473-7. PubMed ID: 19032662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Vaginal misoprostol for induction of labour: a more effective agent than prostaglandin F2 alpha gel and prostaglandin E2 pessary.
    Majoko F; Zwizwai M; Nyström L; Lindmark G
    Cent Afr J Med; 2002; 48(11-12):123-8. PubMed ID: 14562597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A randomized controlled trial of 24-hour vaginal dinoprostone pessary compared to gel for induction of labor in term pregnancies with a Bishop score < or = 4.
    Triglia MT; Palamara F; Lojacono A; Prefumo F; Frusca T
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 May; 89(5):651-7. PubMed ID: 20199360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
    Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Concurrent oxytocin with dinoprostone pessary versus dinoprostone pessary in labour induction of nulliparas with an unfavourable cervix: a randomised placebo-controlled trial.
    Tan PC; Valiapan SD; Tay PY; Omar SZ
    BJOG; 2007 Jul; 114(7):824-32. PubMed ID: 17506788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cervical ripening and induction of labor by prostaglandin E2: a comparison between intracervical gel and vaginal pessary.
    D'Aniello G; Bocchi C; Florio P; Ignacchiti E; Guidoni CG; Centini G; Cito G; Picciolini E; Severi FM; Petraglia F
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2003 Sep; 14(3):158-62. PubMed ID: 14694970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of oral misoprostol tablets and vaginal prostaglandin E2 pessary in induction of labour at term.
    Hassan AA
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2005 May; 15(5):284-7. PubMed ID: 15907239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of Dinoprostone slow release pessary (Propess) with gel (Prostin) for induction of labour at term-a randomised trial.
    Kalkat RK; McMillan E; Cooper H; Palmer K
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Oct; 28(7):695-9. PubMed ID: 19065363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of two preparations of dinoprostone for pre-induction of labour in nulliparous women with very unfavourable cervical condition: a randomised clinical trial.
    Facchinetti F; Venturini P; Verocchi G; Volpe A
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2005 Apr; 119(2):189-93. PubMed ID: 15808378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel versus tablet in the induction of labour at term--a retrospective analysis.
    Shetty A; Livingston I; Acharya S; Templeton A
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Apr; 24(3):243-6. PubMed ID: 15203616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of prostaglandin E2 gel, prostaglandin E2 pessary and extra-amniotic saline infusion with oxytocin for induction of labour.
    Qamar S; Bashir A; Ibrar F
    J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2012; 24(2):22-5. PubMed ID: 24397044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone: a randomized controlled trial.
    Denguezli W; Trimech A; Haddad A; Hajjaji A; Saidani Z; Faleh R; Sakouhi M
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Aug; 276(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 17219155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dinoprostone vaginal pessary for induction of labour: safety of use for up to 24 h.
    Tathem K; Harris LJ; O'Rourke P; Kimble RM
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2012 Dec; 52(6):582-7. PubMed ID: 23004009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A randomised controlled trial comparing low dose vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone vaginal gel for inducing labour at term.
    Gregson S; Waterstone M; Norman I; Murrells T
    BJOG; 2005 Apr; 112(4):438-44. PubMed ID: 15777441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intravaginal prostaglandin E2 for cervical ripening and initiation of labor. Comparison of a multidose gel and single, controlled-release pessary.
    Smith CV; Rayburn WF; Miller AM
    J Reprod Med; 1994 May; 39(5):381-4. PubMed ID: 8064705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is propess a better method of induction of labour in nulliparous women.
    Mukhopadhyay M; Lim KJ; Fairlie FM
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2002 May; 22(3):294-5. PubMed ID: 12521503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Induction of labour with intravaginal misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 gel: a comparative study.
    Nanda S; Singhal SR; Papneja A
    Trop Doct; 2007 Jan; 37(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 17326881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of spontaneous labor with induced vaginal tablets prostaglandin E2 in grand multiparae.
    Sobande AA; Al-Bar HM; Archibong EI
    Saudi Med J; 2001 Aug; 22(8):698-701. PubMed ID: 11573116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is expensive always better? Comparison of two induction agents for term rupture of membranes.
    Parisaei M; Erskine KJ
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Apr; 28(3):290-3. PubMed ID: 18569470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Induction of labour with vaginal prostaglandin tablet vs gel.
    Khan ZA; Abdul B; Majoko F
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2011 Aug; 31(6):492-4. PubMed ID: 21823846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 40.