These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19032688)
21. Abnormal sperm count and motility on semen analysis are not sufficiently predictive of abnormal Kruger morphology. Morelli SS; Seungdamrong A; McCulloh DH; McGovern PG Fertil Steril; 2010 Dec; 94(7):2882-4. PubMed ID: 20674904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Which assisted reproduction technique as a function of sperm morphology?]. Guérif F Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2010 Sep; 38(9):508-10. PubMed ID: 20692863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Semen analysis: its place in modern reproductive medical practice. McLachlan RI; Baker HW; Clarke GN; Harrison KL; Matson PL; Holden CA; de Kretser DM; ; ; Pathology; 2003 Feb; 35(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 12701680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Is your andrology service up to scratch? Tomlinson M Hum Fertil (Camb); 2010 Dec; 13(4):194-200. PubMed ID: 21117928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Morphometric dimensions of the human sperm head depend on the staining method used. Maree L; du Plessis SS; Menkveld R; van der Horst G Hum Reprod; 2010 Jun; 25(6):1369-82. PubMed ID: 20400771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Lack of compliance by UK andrology laboratories with World Health Organization recommendations for sperm morphology assessment. Riddell D; Pacey A; Whittington K Hum Reprod; 2005 Dec; 20(12):3441-5. PubMed ID: 16055460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [The virtual slide: a new tool for the External Quality Control for the spermatozoid assessment morphology]. Bourguignat A; Foliguet B; Auger J; Férard G; Pfeffer J; Pilikian-Haond S; Schmitt F; Szerman E; Siest JP Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2011; 69(2):191-8. PubMed ID: 21464012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. African experience with sperm morphology training courses. Franken DR Reprod Biomed Online; 2003; 7(1):114-9. PubMed ID: 12930591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Semen quality and age-specific changes: a study between two decades on 3,729 male partners of couples with normal sperm count and attending an andrology laboratory for infertility-related problems in an Indian city. Mukhopadhyay D; Varghese AC; Pal M; Banerjee SK; Bhattacharyya AK; Sharma RK; Agarwal A Fertil Steril; 2010 May; 93(7):2247-54. PubMed ID: 19328484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The importance of computer-assisted semen analysis and sperm function testing in an IVF program. Joshi N; Kodwany G; Balaiah D; Parikh M; Parikh F Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud; 1996; 41(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 8673156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [The first practical seminar of difficult airway management in the 51st annual meeting of Japan Society of Anesthesiologists]. Nakagawa M; Nomura T; Igarashi H; Kurata J; Tsujimoto S; Kaminoh Y Masui; 2005 May; 54(5):557-62. PubMed ID: 15915759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Monitoring technologist reading skills in a sperm morphology quality control program. Franken DR; Menkveld R; Kruger TF; Sekadde-Kigondu C; Lombard C Fertil Steril; 2003 Jun; 79 Suppl 3():1637-43. PubMed ID: 12801571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Quality management in the andrology laboratory. Michelmann HW Int J Androl; 1997; 20 Suppl 3():50-4. PubMed ID: 9466186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Natural sperm birefringence can be used to estimate sperm viability and morphology. Collodel G; Federico MG; Pascarelli NA; Geminiani M; Moretti E Syst Biol Reprod Med; 2010 Dec; 56(6):465-72. PubMed ID: 20925592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Quality assurance and quality control in the laboratory andrology. Pacey AA Asian J Androl; 2010 Jan; 12(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 20111077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Refresher training and continuing education for para-medical ophthalmic assistants. Shamanna BR; Rao RS; Premarajan KC; Saravanan S; Thulasiraj RD; Venkataswamy G Indian J Ophthalmol; 1999 Mar; 47(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 16130288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Survey of semen analysis practices in India and need for standardization and improvement. Kale S; Bathe S; Agrawal R; More P; Bharadwaj E Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2022; 65(1):117-122. PubMed ID: 35074975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Automated sperm morphometry and morphology analysis of canine semen by the Hamilton-Thorne analyser. Rijsselaere T; Van Soom A; Hoflack G; Maes D; de Kruif A Theriogenology; 2004 Oct; 62(7):1292-306. PubMed ID: 15325556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [A preliminary study of pre-analysis quality control for semen analysis]. Ge YF; Wang CH; Lu JC; Shao Y; Yao B; Xia XY; Shang XJ; Huang YF Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2008 Nov; 14(11):1015-8. PubMed ID: 19102504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Does the potential for selection bias in semen quality studies depend on study design? Experience from a study conducted within an infertility clinic. Hauser R; Godfrey-Bailey L; Chen Z Hum Reprod; 2005 Sep; 20(9):2579-83. PubMed ID: 15890729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]