These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19032738)

  • 1. Integrated online formative assessments in the biomedical sciences for medical students: benefits for learning.
    Velan GM; Jones P; McNeil HP; Kumar RK
    BMC Med Educ; 2008 Nov; 8():52. PubMed ID: 19032738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Online feedback assessments in physiology: effects on students' learning experiences and outcomes.
    Marden NY; Ulman LG; Wilson FS; Velan GM
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2013 Jun; 37(2):192-200. PubMed ID: 23728137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of formative assessment as an educational tool.
    Jain V; Agrawal V; Biswas S
    J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2012; 24(3-4):68-70. PubMed ID: 24669614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of online formative assessment on summative performance in integrated musculoskeletal system module.
    Mitra NK; Barua A
    BMC Med Educ; 2015 Mar; 15():29. PubMed ID: 25884641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The assessment of a structured online formative assessment program: a randomised controlled trial.
    Palmer E; Devitt P
    BMC Med Educ; 2014 Jan; 14():8. PubMed ID: 24400883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Online formative assessments: exploring their educational value.
    Nagandla K; Sulaiha S; Nalliah S
    J Adv Med Educ Prof; 2018 Apr; 6(2):51-57. PubMed ID: 29607332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Do students achieve the desired learning goals using open-book formative assessments?
    Minder SP; Weibel D; Wissmath B; Schmitz FM
    Int J Med Educ; 2018 Nov; 9():293-301. PubMed ID: 30457974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of online formative assessment upon student learning in biomedical science courses.
    Olson BL; McDonald JL
    J Dent Educ; 2004 Jun; 68(6):656-9. PubMed ID: 15217084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of Web-based formative assessment to support student learning in a metabolism/nutrition unit.
    Henly DC
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2003 Aug; 7(3):116-22. PubMed ID: 12846820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An investigation of preclinical medical students' preference for summative or formative assessment for physiology learning.
    Rae MG; Abdulla MH
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2023 Sep; 47(3):383-392. PubMed ID: 37141432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Investigating the use of quick response codes in the gross anatomy laboratory.
    Traser CJ; Hoffman LA; Seifert MF; Wilson AB
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(5):421-8. PubMed ID: 25288343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Certainty rating in pre-and post-tests of study modules in an online clinical pharmacy course - A pilot study to evaluate teaching and learning.
    Luetsch K; Burrows J
    BMC Med Educ; 2016 Oct; 16(1):267. PubMed ID: 27741945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computer-based medical education in Benha University, Egypt: knowledge, attitude, limitations, and suggestions.
    Bayomy H; El Awadi M; El Araby E; Abed HA
    J Egypt Public Health Assoc; 2016 Dec; 91(4):179-184. PubMed ID: 28145990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Online dissection audio-visual resources for human anatomy: Undergraduate medical students' usage and learning outcomes.
    Choi-Lundberg DL; Cuellar WA; Williams AM
    Anat Sci Educ; 2016 Nov; 9(6):545-554. PubMed ID: 27802370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Students' motives for using online formative assessments when preparing for summative assessments.
    De Kleijn RA; Bouwmeester RA; Ritzen MM; Ramaekers SP; Van Rijen HV
    Med Teach; 2013 Dec; 35(12):e1644-50. PubMed ID: 24050678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Formative assessment and academic achievement in pre-graduate students of health sciences.
    Carrillo-de-la-Peña MT; Baillès E; Caseras X; Martínez A; Ortet G; Pérez J
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2009 Mar; 14(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 17972153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. To quiz or not to quiz: Formative tests help detect students at risk of failing the clinical anatomy course.
    Azzi AJ; Ramnanan CJ; Smith J; Dionne É; Jalali A
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(5):413-20. PubMed ID: 25227111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Out of sight, out of mind: Do repeating students overlook online course components?
    Holland J; Clarke E; Glynn M
    Anat Sci Educ; 2016 Nov; 9(6):555-564. PubMed ID: 27096280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Certainty-based marking in a formative assessment improves student course appreciation but not summative examination scores.
    Hendriks WJAJ; Bakker N; Pluk H; de Brouwer A; Wieringa B; Cambi A; Zegers M; Wansink DG; Leunissen R; Klaren PHM
    BMC Med Educ; 2019 May; 19(1):178. PubMed ID: 31151456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating a technology supported interactive response system during the laboratory section of a histology course.
    Rinaldi VD; Lorr NA; Williams K
    Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Jul; 10(4):328-338. PubMed ID: 28678444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.