These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19032791)

  • 1. An effective and efficient approach for manually improving geocoded data.
    Goldberg DW; Wilson JP; Knoblock CA; Ritz B; Cockburn MG
    Int J Health Geogr; 2008 Nov; 7():60. PubMed ID: 19032791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An analysis of the process and results of manual geocode correction.
    McDonald YJ; Schwind M; Goldberg DW; Lampley A; Wheeler CM
    Geospat Health; 2017 May; 12(1):526. PubMed ID: 28555477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantifying geocode location error using GIS methods.
    Strickland MJ; Siffel C; Gardner BR; Berzen AK; Correa A
    Environ Health; 2007 Apr; 6():10. PubMed ID: 17408484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the positional difference between two common geocoding methods.
    Duncan DT; Castro MC; Blossom JC; Bennett GG; Gortmaker SL
    Geospat Health; 2011 May; 5(2):265-73. PubMed ID: 21590677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improved Geocoding of Cancer Registry Addresses in Urban and Rural Oklahoma.
    Dilekli N; Janitz A; Campbell J
    J Registry Manag; 2020; 47(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 32833379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Geocoding rural addresses in a community contaminated by PFOA: a comparison of methods.
    Vieira VM; Howard GJ; Gallagher LG; Fletcher T
    Environ Health; 2010 Apr; 9():18. PubMed ID: 20406495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Who Hits the Mark? A Comparative Study of the Free Geocoding Services of Google and OpenStreetMap].
    Lemke D; Mattauch V; Heidinger O; Hense HW
    Gesundheitswesen; 2015 Sep; 77(8-9):e160-5. PubMed ID: 26154258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Geocoding in cancer research: a review.
    Rushton G; Armstrong MP; Gittler J; Greene BR; Pavlik CE; West MM; Zimmerman DL
    Am J Prev Med; 2006 Feb; 30(2 Suppl):S16-24. PubMed ID: 16458786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An evaluation framework for comparing geocoding systems.
    Goldberg DW; Ballard M; Boyd JH; Mullan N; Garfield C; Rosman D; Ferrante AM; Semmens JB
    Int J Health Geogr; 2013 Nov; 12():50. PubMed ID: 24207169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using imputation to provide location information for nongeocoded addresses.
    Curriero FC; Kulldorff M; Boscoe FP; Klassen AC
    PLoS One; 2010 Feb; 5(2):e8998. PubMed ID: 20161766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. POINT: Pipeline for Offline Conversion and Integration of Geocodes and Neighborhood Data.
    Guo K; McCoy AB; Reese TJ; Wright A; Rosenbloom ST; Liu S; Russo EM; Steitz BD
    Appl Clin Inform; 2023 Oct; 14(5):833-842. PubMed ID: 37541656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modeling the probability distribution of positional errors incurred by residential address geocoding.
    Zimmerman DL; Fang X; Mazumdar S; Rushton G
    Int J Health Geogr; 2007 Jan; 6():1. PubMed ID: 17214903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Geocoding accuracy and the recovery of relationships between environmental exposures and health.
    Mazumdar S; Rushton G; Smith BJ; Zimmerman DL; Donham KJ
    Int J Health Geogr; 2008 Apr; 7():13. PubMed ID: 18387189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Role of geographic information systems in birth defects surveillance and research.
    Siffel C; Strickland MJ; Gardner BR; Kirby RS; Correa A
    Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2006 Nov; 76(11):825-33. PubMed ID: 17094141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improving geocoding matching rates of structured addresses in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
    Cortes TR; Silveira IHD; Junger WL
    Cad Saude Publica; 2021; 37(7):e00039321. PubMed ID: 34346979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing a single-stage geocoding method to a multi-stage geocoding method: how much and where do they disagree?
    Lovasi GS; Weiss JC; Hoskins R; Whitsel EA; Rice K; Erickson CF; Psaty BM
    Int J Health Geogr; 2007 Mar; 6():12. PubMed ID: 17367520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of geoimputation strategies in a large case study.
    Dilekli N; Janitz AE; Campbell JE; de Beurs KM
    Int J Health Geogr; 2018 Jul; 17(1):30. PubMed ID: 30064506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A multifaceted comparison of ArcGIS and MapMarker for automated geocoding.
    Kumar S; Liu M; Hwang SA
    Geospat Health; 2012 Nov; 7(1):145-51. PubMed ID: 23242688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Area-Based Geocoding: An Approach to Exposure Assessment Incorporating Positional Uncertainty.
    Thompson LK; Langholz B; Goldberg DW; Wilson JP; Ritz B; Tayour C; Cockburn M
    Geohealth; 2021 Dec; 5(12):e2021GH000430. PubMed ID: 34859166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spatial Heterogeneity in Positional Errors: A Comparison of Two Residential Geocoding Efforts in the Agricultural Health Study.
    Fisher JA; Spaur M; Buller ID; Flory AR; Beane Freeman LE; Hofmann JN; Giangrande M; Jones RR; Ward MH
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Feb; 18(4):. PubMed ID: 33572119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.