These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

439 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19033027)

  • 41. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
    Caputi S; Varvara G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Effect of mixing technique on shrinkage rate of one polyether and two polyvinyl siloxane impression materials.
    Lampé I; Marton S; Hegedüs C
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(5):590. PubMed ID: 15543917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Three-dimensional analysis of dual-arch impression trays.
    Cayouette MJ; Burgess JO; Jones RE; Yuan CH
    Quintessence Int; 2003 Mar; 34(3):189-98. PubMed ID: 12731600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Evaluation of the elastic recovery of polyether impression materials.
    Endo T; Finger WJ
    Am J Dent; 2005 Dec; 18(6):355-60. PubMed ID: 16433407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The service life of implant-retained overdenture attachment systems.
    Pigozzo MN; Mesquita MF; Henriques GE; Vaz LG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Aug; 102(2):74-80. PubMed ID: 19643220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Disinfection effect of dental impression tray adhesives.
    Bensel T; Pollak R; Stimmelmayr M; Hey J
    Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Mar; 17(2):497-502. PubMed ID: 22543895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Comparison of Tensile Bond Strength of Addition Silicone with Different Custom Tray Materials Using Different Retentive Methods.
    Patil RV; Vijayraghavan V; Jadhav M; Jajoo S; Desai S; Jagtap C
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Mar; 22(3):278-283. PubMed ID: 34210929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Adhesion of elastomeric impression materials to trays.
    Bindra B; Heath JR
    J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Jan; 24(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 9049922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Effects of glow-discharge and surfactant treatments on the wettability of vinyl polysiloxane impression materials.
    Erkut S; Can G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Apr; 93(4):356-63. PubMed ID: 15798686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [Effects of different tray types on the resulting impression].
    Biffar R; Bittner B
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1989 Aug; 44(8):624-7. PubMed ID: 2700730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Implant cast accuracy as a function of impression techniques and impression material viscosity.
    Walker MP; Ries D; Borello B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):669-74. PubMed ID: 18807563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Tensile elastic recovery of elastomeric impression materials.
    Lawson NC; Burgess JO; Litaker MS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jul; 100(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 18589071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Dimensional accuracy of 2-stage putty-wash impressions: influence of impression trays and viscosity.
    Balkenhol M; Ferger P; Wöstmann B
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(6):573-5. PubMed ID: 18069363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The effect of immediate dentin sealing on the marginal adaptation and bond strengths of total-etch and self-etch adhesives.
    Duarte S; de Freitas CR; Saad JR; Sadan A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jul; 102(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 19573687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Sulcus reproduction with elastomeric impression materials: a new in vitro testing method.
    Finger WJ; Kurokawa R; Takahashi H; Komatsu M
    Dent Mater; 2008 Dec; 24(12):1655-60. PubMed ID: 18499246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A retrospective comparison of two definitive impression techniques and their associated postinsertion adjustments in complete denture prosthodontics.
    Drago CJ
    J Prosthodont; 2003 Sep; 12(3):192-7. PubMed ID: 14508741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Drying time of tray adhesive for adequate tensile bond strength between polyvinylsiloxane impression and tray resin material.
    Yi MH; Shim JS; Lee KW; Chung MK
    J Adv Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 1(2):63-7. PubMed ID: 21165257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Strength of tray adhesives for elastomeric impression materials.
    Nicholson JW; Porter KH; Dolan T
    Oper Dent; 1985; 10(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 3883322
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Disposable plastic trays and their effect on polyether and vinyl polysiloxane impression accuracy-an in vitro study.
    Rues S; Stober T; Bargum T; Rammelsberg P; Zenthöfer A
    Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Mar; 25(3):1475-1484. PubMed ID: 32885321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A randomized clinical trial to compare diagnostic casts made using plastic and metal trays.
    Damodara EK; Litaker MS; Rahemtulla F; McCracken MS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Dec; 104(6):364-71. PubMed ID: 21095399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.