635 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19033431)
1. A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of bitewing, periapical, unfiltered and filtered digital panoramic images for approximal caries detection in posterior teeth.
Akarslan ZZ; Akdevelioğlu M; Güngör K; Erten H
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Dec; 37(8):458-63. PubMed ID: 19033431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intraoral versus extraoral bitewing radiography in detection of enamel proximal caries: an ex vivo study.
Abu El-Ela WH; Farid MM; Mostafa MS
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(4):20150326. PubMed ID: 26892946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison between Scanora panoramic radiography and bitewing radiography in the assessment of marginal bone tissue.
Ivanauskaite D; Lindh C; Rangne K; Rohlin M
Stomatologija; 2006; 8(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 16687909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A clinical comparison of extraoral panoramic and intraoral radiographic modalities for detecting proximal caries and visualizing open posterior interproximal contacts.
Terry GL; Noujeim M; Langlais RP; Moore WS; Prihoda TJ
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(4):20150159. PubMed ID: 26869221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vitro comparison of four different dental X-ray films and direct digital radiography for proximal caries detection.
Alkurt MT; Peker I; Bala O; Altunkaynak B
Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):504-9. PubMed ID: 17910228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of clinician agreement during visualization of conventional and digitized bitewing radiographs.
Kimmes NS; Saini TS; Carroll LR
Gen Dent; 2006; 54(3):182-5. PubMed ID: 16776410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Observer performance based on marginal bone tissue visibility in Scanora panoramic radiography and posterior bitewing radiography.
Ivanauskaite D; Lindh C; Rohlin M
Stomatologija; 2008; 10(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 18493164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of trabecular pattern on periapical and panoramic radiographs: a pilot study.
Pham D; Jonasson G; Kiliaridis S
Acta Odontol Scand; 2010 Mar; 68(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 20085501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of displayed image size on radiographic detection of approximal caries.
Haak R; Wicht MJ; Nowak G; Hellmich M
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Jul; 32(4):242-6. PubMed ID: 13679355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ex vivo evaluation of new 2D and 3D dental radiographic technology for detecting caries.
Gaalaas L; Tyndall D; Mol A; Everett ET; Bangdiwala A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(3):20150281. PubMed ID: 26670605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of diagnostic performance on approximal caries detection among Swedish and Chinese senior dental students using analogue and digital radiographs.
Minston W; Li G; Wennberg R; Näsström K; Shi XQ
Swed Dent J; 2013; 37(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 23957142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparing the accuracy of panoramic and intraoral radiography in the diagnosis of proximal caries.
Akkaya N; Kansu O; Kansu H; Cagirankaya LB; Arslan U
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 May; 35(3):170-4. PubMed ID: 16618850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Film tomography compared with film and digital bitewing radiography for proximal caries detection.
Peker I; Toraman Alkurt M; Altunkaynak B
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Dec; 36(8):495-9. PubMed ID: 18033947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Extraoral imaging for proximal caries detection: Bitewings vs scanogram.
Khan EA; Tyndall DA; Caplan D
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2004 Dec; 98(6):730-7. PubMed ID: 15583548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Proximal caries detection accuracy using intraoral bitewing radiography, extraoral bitewing radiography and panoramic radiography.
Kamburoglu K; Kolsuz E; Murat S; Yüksel S; Ozen T
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 Sep; 41(6):450-9. PubMed ID: 22868296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of panoramic and intraoral radiography for the diagnosis of caries and periapical pathology.
Molander B; Ahlqwist M; Gröndahl HG; Hollender L
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Feb; 22(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 8508938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnosis of approximal caries: bite-wing radiology versus the Ultrasound Caries Detector. An in vitro study.
Matalon S; Feuerstein O; Kaffe I
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 May; 95(5):626-31. PubMed ID: 12738956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Approximal caries depth assessment with storage phosphor versus film radiography. Evaluation of the caries-specific Oslo enhancement procedure.
Svanaes DB; Moystad A; Larheim TA
Caries Res; 2000; 34(6):448-53. PubMed ID: 11093017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The diagnostic accuracy of a laser fluorescence device and digital radiography in detecting approximal caries lesions in posterior permanent teeth: an in vivo study.
Menem R; Barngkgei I; Beiruti N; Al Haffar I; Joury E
Lasers Med Sci; 2017 Apr; 32(3):621-628. PubMed ID: 28194533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostic accuracy of two software modalities for detection of caries lesions in digital radiographs from four dental systems.
Hintze H
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Mar; 35(2):78-82. PubMed ID: 16549433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
