These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

457 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19034694)

  • 1. Mechanisms of dealing with DNA damage-induced replication problems.
    Budzowska M; Kanaar R
    Cell Biochem Biophys; 2009; 53(1):17-31. PubMed ID: 19034694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Post-replication repair in DT40 cells: translesion polymerases versus recombinases.
    Hochegger H; Sonoda E; Takeda S
    Bioessays; 2004 Feb; 26(2):151-8. PubMed ID: 14745833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. DNA damage responses and their many interactions with the replication fork.
    Andreassen PR; Ho GP; D'Andrea AD
    Carcinogenesis; 2006 May; 27(5):883-92. PubMed ID: 16490739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Eukaryotic error prone DNA polymerases: suggested roles in replication, repair and mutagenesis].
    Krutiakov VM
    Mol Biol (Mosk); 2006; 40(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 16523685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multiple pathways cooperate to facilitate DNA replication fork progression through alkylated DNA.
    Vázquez MV; Rojas V; Tercero JA
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2008 Oct; 7(10):1693-704. PubMed ID: 18640290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Timing and spacing of ubiquitin-dependent DNA damage bypass.
    Ulrich HD
    FEBS Lett; 2011 Sep; 585(18):2861-7. PubMed ID: 21605556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Roles of DNA polymerases in replication, repair, and recombination in eukaryotes.
    Pavlov YI; Shcherbakova PV; Rogozin IB
    Int Rev Cytol; 2006; 255():41-132. PubMed ID: 17178465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How are specialized (low-fidelity) eukaryotic polymerases selected and switched with high-fidelity polymerases during translesion DNA synthesis?
    Fischhaber PL; Friedberg EC
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2005 Feb; 4(2):279-83. PubMed ID: 15590336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Maintenance of fork integrity at damaged DNA and natural pause sites.
    Tourrière H; Pasero P
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2007 Jul; 6(7):900-13. PubMed ID: 17379579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pol32 is required for Pol zeta-dependent translesion synthesis and prevents double-strand breaks at the replication fork.
    Hanna M; Ball LG; Tong AH; Boone C; Xiao W
    Mutat Res; 2007 Dec; 625(1-2):164-76. PubMed ID: 17681555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Suffering in silence: the tolerance of DNA damage.
    Friedberg EC
    Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol; 2005 Dec; 6(12):943-53. PubMed ID: 16341080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The DNA damage response during DNA replication.
    Branzei D; Foiani M
    Curr Opin Cell Biol; 2005 Dec; 17(6):568-75. PubMed ID: 16226452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Caffeine delays replication fork progression and enhances UV-induced homologous recombination in Chinese hamster cell lines.
    Johansson F; Lagerqvist A; Filippi S; Palitti F; Erixon K; Helleday T; Jenssen D
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2006 Dec; 5(12):1449-58. PubMed ID: 16968677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Replication of damaged DNA by translesion synthesis in human cells.
    Lehmann AR
    FEBS Lett; 2005 Feb; 579(4):873-6. PubMed ID: 15680966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Non-mutagenic and mutagenic post-replicative DNA repair in prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells].
    Zhestianikov VD
    Tsitologiia; 2000; 42(9):837-43. PubMed ID: 11077674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Eukaryotic DNA damage tolerance and translesion synthesis through covalent modifications of PCNA.
    Andersen PL; Xu F; Xiao W
    Cell Res; 2008 Jan; 18(1):162-73. PubMed ID: 18157158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. DNA damage-induced mutagenesis : a novel target for cancer prevention.
    Wang Z
    Mol Interv; 2001 Dec; 1(5):269-81. PubMed ID: 14993366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Replication fork dynamics and the DNA damage response.
    Jones RM; Petermann E
    Biochem J; 2012 Apr; 443(1):13-26. PubMed ID: 22417748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Identification of a strand-related bias in the PCNA-mediated bypass of spontaneous lesions by yeast Poleta.
    Abdulovic AL; Minesinger BK; Jinks-Robertson S
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2007 Sep; 6(9):1307-18. PubMed ID: 17442629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantitative measurement of translesion replication in human cells: evidence for bypass of abasic sites by a replicative DNA polymerase.
    Avkin S; Adar S; Blander G; Livneh Z
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2002 Mar; 99(6):3764-9. PubMed ID: 11891323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.