BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19034808)

  • 1. Consequences of Screening in Breast Cancer (COS-BC): development of a questionnaire.
    Brodersen J; Thorsen H
    Scand J Prim Health Care; 2008; 26(4):251-6. PubMed ID: 19034808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adaptation to Swedish and further development of the 'Consequences of Screening - Breast Cancer' questionnaire: a multimethod study.
    Bolejko A; Wann-Hansson C; Zackrisson S; Brodersen J; Hagell P
    Scand J Caring Sci; 2013 Jun; 27(2):475-86. PubMed ID: 22804720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Psychosocial consequences among women with false-positive results after mammography screening in Norway.
    Solbjør M; Forsmo S; Skolbekken JA; Siersma V; Brodersen J
    Scand J Prim Health Care; 2018 Dec; 36(4):380-389. PubMed ID: 30296861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Long-term psychosocial consequences of false-positive screening mammography.
    Brodersen J; Siersma VD
    Ann Fam Med; 2013; 11(2):106-15. PubMed ID: 23508596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prevalence, Long-term Development, and Predictors of Psychosocial Consequences of False-Positive Mammography among Women Attending Population-Based Screening.
    Bolejko A; Hagell P; Wann-Hansson C; Zackrisson S
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2015 Sep; 24(9):1388-97. PubMed ID: 26311562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Women with false positive screening mammograms: how do they cope?
    Olsson P; Armelius K; Nordahl G; Lenner P; Westman G
    J Med Screen; 1999; 6(2):89-93. PubMed ID: 10444727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Consequences of screening in cervical cancer: development and dimensionality of a questionnaire.
    Brodersen J; Siersma V; Thorsen H
    BMC Psychol; 2018 Aug; 6(1):39. PubMed ID: 30097013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Long-term psychosocial consequences of false-positive screening mammography: a cohort study with follow-up of 12-14 years in Denmark.
    Gram EG; Siersma V; Brodersen JB
    BMJ Open; 2023 Apr; 13(4):e072188. PubMed ID: 37185642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diagnostic invasiveness and psychosocial consequences of false-positive mammography.
    Heleno B; Siersma VD; Brodersen J
    Ann Fam Med; 2015; 13(3):242-9. PubMed ID: 25964402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Women who are recalled for further investigation for breast screening: psychological consequences 3 years after recall and factors affecting re-attendance.
    Brett J; Austoker J
    J Public Health Med; 2001 Dec; 23(4):292-300. PubMed ID: 11873891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A roller coaster of emotions and sense--coping with the perceived psychosocial consequences of a false-positive screening mammography.
    Bolejko A; Zackrisson S; Hagell P; Wann-Hansson C
    J Clin Nurs; 2014 Jul; 23(13-14):2053-62. PubMed ID: 24313329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Psychometric properties of a Swedish version of the Consequences of Screening--Breast Cancer questionnaire.
    Bolejko A; Brodersen J; Zackrisson S; Wann-Hansson C; Hagell P
    J Adv Nurs; 2014 Oct; 70(10):2373-88. PubMed ID: 24617823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Psychological Impact of Referral for Mammography Screening for Breast Cancer Among Women in Muscat Governorate: A cross-sectional study.
    Al-Alawi NM; Al-Balushi N; Al Salmani AA
    Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J; 2019 Aug; 19(3):e225-e229. PubMed ID: 31728220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validation of a condition-specific measure for women having an abnormal screening mammography.
    Brodersen J; Thorsen H; Kreiner S
    Value Health; 2007; 10(4):294-304. PubMed ID: 17645684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The adequacy of measurement of short and long-term consequences of false-positive screening mammography.
    Brodersen J; Thorsen H; Cockburn J
    J Med Screen; 2004; 11(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 15006113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Consequences of screening in lung cancer: development and dimensionality of a questionnaire.
    Brodersen J; Thorsen H; Kreiner S
    Value Health; 2010 Aug; 13(5):601-12. PubMed ID: 20345552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Participation behaviour following a false positive test in the Copenhagen mammography screening programme.
    Andersen SB; Vejborg I; von Euler-Chelpin M
    Acta Oncol; 2008; 47(4):550-5. PubMed ID: 18465321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Distressed or relieved? Psychological side effects of breast cancer screening in The Netherlands.
    Scaf-Klomp W; Sanderman R; van de Wiel HB; Otter R; van den Heuvel WJ
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1997 Dec; 51(6):705-10. PubMed ID: 9519137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Mammography screening--advantages and disadvantages].
    Olsen AH; Schwartz W; Vejborg IM
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2007 Sep; 169(36):2977-9. PubMed ID: 17953873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cancer anxiety and attitudes toward mammography among screening attenders, nonattenders, and women never invited.
    Gram IT; Slenker SE
    Am J Public Health; 1992 Feb; 82(2):249-51. PubMed ID: 1739156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.