These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19034901)

  • 1. Adaptive control of the false discovery rate in voxel-based morphometry.
    Chen S; Wang C; Eberly LE; Caffo BS; Schwartz BS
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2009 Jul; 30(7):2304-11. PubMed ID: 19034901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Permutation and parametric tests for effect sizes in voxel-based morphometry of gray matter volume in brain structural MRI.
    Dickie DA; Mikhael S; Job DE; Wardlaw JM; Laidlaw DH; Bastin ME
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Dec; 33(10):1299-1305. PubMed ID: 26253778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Topological FDR for neuroimaging.
    Chumbley J; Worsley K; Flandin G; Friston K
    Neuroimage; 2010 Feb; 49(4):3057-64. PubMed ID: 19944173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Enhanced signal detection in neuroimaging by means of regional control of the global false discovery rate.
    Langers DR; Jansen JF; Backes WH
    Neuroimage; 2007 Oct; 38(1):43-56. PubMed ID: 17825583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Paradoxical results of adaptive false discovery rate procedures in neuroimaging studies.
    Reiss PT; Schwartzman A; Lu F; Huang L; Proal E
    Neuroimage; 2012 Dec; 63(4):1833-40. PubMed ID: 22842214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of the resolution of brain parcels on connectome-wide association studies in fMRI.
    Bellec P; Benhajali Y; Carbonell F; Dansereau C; Albouy G; Pelland M; Craddock C; Collignon O; Doyon J; Stip E; Orban P
    Neuroimage; 2015 Dec; 123():212-28. PubMed ID: 26241681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Determining the optimal level of smoothing in cortical thickness analysis: a hierarchical approach based on sequential statistical thresholding.
    Bernal-Rusiel JL; Atienza M; Cantero JL
    Neuroimage; 2010 Aug; 52(1):158-71. PubMed ID: 20362677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. False discovery rate control in magnetic resonance imaging studies via Markov random fields.
    Nguyen HD; McLachlan GJ; Cherbuin N; Janke AL
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2014 Aug; 33(8):1735-48. PubMed ID: 24816549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Equitable Thresholding and Clustering: A Novel Method for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clustering in AFNI.
    Cox RW
    Brain Connect; 2019 Sep; 9(7):529-538. PubMed ID: 31115252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Empirical null and false discovery rate analysis in neuroimaging.
    Schwartzman A; Dougherty RF; Lee J; Ghahremani D; Taylor JE
    Neuroimage; 2009 Jan; 44(1):71-82. PubMed ID: 18547821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Resampling-based empirical Bayes multiple testing procedures for controlling generalized tail probability and expected value error rates: focus on the false discovery rate and simulation study.
    Dudoit S; Gilbert HN; van der Laan MJ
    Biom J; 2008 Oct; 50(5):716-44. PubMed ID: 18932138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An evaluation of spatial thresholding techniques in fMRI analysis.
    Logan BR; Geliazkova MP; Rowe DB
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2008 Dec; 29(12):1379-89. PubMed ID: 18064589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multiple testing with discrete data: Proportion of true null hypotheses and two adaptive FDR procedures.
    Chen X; Doerge RW; Heyse JF
    Biom J; 2018 Jul; 60(4):761-779. PubMed ID: 29748972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Thresholding of statistical maps in functional neuroimaging using the false discovery rate.
    Genovese CR; Lazar NA; Nichols T
    Neuroimage; 2002 Apr; 15(4):870-8. PubMed ID: 11906227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. False discovery rate revisited: FDR and topological inference using Gaussian random fields.
    Chumbley JR; Friston KJ
    Neuroimage; 2009 Jan; 44(1):62-70. PubMed ID: 18603449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. MIDAS: Regionally linear multivariate discriminative statistical mapping.
    Varol E; Sotiras A; Davatzikos C
    Neuroimage; 2018 Jul; 174():111-126. PubMed ID: 29524624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Incorporating spatial dependence into Bayesian multiple testing of statistical parametric maps in functional neuroimaging.
    Brown DA; Lazar NA; Datta GS; Jang W; McDowell JE
    Neuroimage; 2014 Jan; 84():97-112. PubMed ID: 23981437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The problem of low variance voxels in statistical parametric mapping; a new hat avoids a 'haircut'.
    Ridgway GR; Litvak V; Flandin G; Friston KJ; Penny WD
    Neuroimage; 2012 Feb; 59(3):2131-41. PubMed ID: 22037420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. More Specific Signal Detection in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging by False Discovery Rate Control for Hierarchically Structured Systems of Hypotheses.
    Schildknecht K; Tabelow K; Dickhaus T
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0149016. PubMed ID: 26914144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimation of false discovery rates for wavelet-denoised statistical parametric maps.
    Srikanth R; Casanova R; Laurienti PJ; Peiffer AM; Maldjian JA
    Neuroimage; 2006 Oct; 33(1):72-84. PubMed ID: 16919480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.